Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th October 2013 | 21:20
  #801 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: uk
thorpey,

I hear that there was enough uptake from the military and that Bristow have up'd their wages.
Helimed24 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2013 | 21:41
  #802 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: here
Thanks for that, appreciated.
thorpey is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2013 | 06:40
  #803 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: A4 tray 1
SAR rear crew positions

Hopefully someone can shed some light on the rear crew process...

Initially Bristow HR sent a date of September... I see some guys have receive the "thanks but no thanks" pilots and crewmen alike..... I also hear the Gap SAR guys have only just got their contracts so are Bristow just behind the drag time wise?
HarryMonk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2013 | 07:17
  #804 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 151
Likes: 3
From: UK
UK SAR 2013 privatisation: the new thread

Satsuma
No link to the article? That's not very helpful. Should we guess?

Sorry I got the hard copy and I naturally assumed that a man of your resources would be able to just google it?!

It's actually about the history of UK SAR both military and civilian.
snakepit is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2013 | 16:07
  #805 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Aarhus
First production AW189 performs its maiden flight | Vertical Magazine - The Pulse of the Helicopter Industry
meanttobe is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2013 | 17:19
  #806 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: UK
an extremely reduced time to market
But not rushed I trust.

Is this really a good idea, praying that 50% of our nation's SAR future is secure in an as yet unproven aircraft?
satsuma is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2013 | 21:18
  #807 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 129
Likes: 2
From: France
Satsuma. I think the clue is in First Production. If it was first aircraft yes it would be a short time frame.
Sevarg is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2013 | 13:15
  #808 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Originally Posted by satsuma
But not rushed I trust.

Is this really a good idea, praying that 50% of our nation's SAR future is secure in an as yet unproven aircraft?

Yes. It's a risk.

Time to move on.
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2013 | 16:47
  #809 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: UK
Well, you're half right. Keeping your fingers crossed is not a sound basis for future success.
satsuma is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2013 | 19:51
  #810 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Originally Posted by satsuma
.... Keeping your fingers crossed is not a sound basis for future success.
Well, there's crossing your fingers and there's crossing your fingers.

In 1978, and again in 1983, folk were crossing their fingers about the single engine performance of the SK and 61.

Still crossed.

How much worse can it get?
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2013 | 21:48
  #811 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: UK
You may yet get to see the S61 in the SAR role again Jim if the 189 isn't ready on time.
satsuma is offline  
Reply
Old 12th October 2013 | 09:20
  #812 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
I don't think so.

I see two options for two very different levels of disaster.

189 late = 139 stand-in.

All goes into room 101 = 101.
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th October 2013 | 17:11
  #813 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: ireland
Hi all,

WINCH OPERATOR
Requirements
· one (1) year’s previous experience on a dedicated SAR unit as a Winch Operator on helicopters
· two hundred and fifty (250) hours operating experience in helicopters gained in an operational environment similar to the intended operation
· no criminal record, safe flying record and the right to reside and work in the UK
(Training may be given to the right candidates)

My question is: are you also require to have a medical background for this position if you already meet the requirments above?
eg, paramedic/emt registration certificates needed?

Information much appreciated,
Cheers!
jn45672 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 08:55
  #814 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Aarhus
My question is: are you also require to have a medical background for this position if you already meet the requirments above?
eg, paramedic/emt registration certificates needed?
This may be of help. It comes from the ITPD doc.
1762 1
2.3.3 The Contractor shall provide Winchmen with at least 3 month’s experience each in a dedicated military/civilian SAR unit.
2077 K
2.3.4 The Contractor shall ensure the continuing professional development of medically qualified rearcrew to maintain medical standards and currency iaw policy set by the clinical director.
2.3.2.1 The Contractor shall provide rearcrew trained to a minimum of BIEC standard (equivalent to the IHCD Emergency Medical Technician) and with at least one Paramedic qualified rearcrew on each shift.
2.3.3.1 The Contractor shall provide rearcrew trained to a minimum of BIEC standard (equivalent to the IHCD Emergency Medical Technician) and with at least one Paramedic qualified rearcrew on each shift.
.

Last edited by meanttobe; 13th October 2013 at 08:58.
meanttobe is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 08:57
  #815 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Aarhus
You may yet get to see the S61 in the SAR role again Jim if the 189 isn't ready on time.
Rumour has it the Falklands SAR contract currently being bid may see the S61 T being put forward by more than one of the bidders.

Last edited by meanttobe; 13th October 2013 at 08:59.
meanttobe is offline  
Reply
Old 13th October 2013 | 19:56
  #816 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 202
Likes: 69
From: Falkland Islands and UK
Does the Carson S61T have any European Civil Certification yet?

Rumour has it the Falklands SAR contract currently being bid may see the S61 T being put forward by more than one of the bidders.
Ant T is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 18:29
  #817 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: ireland
That's great,

Thanks a lot for the info..I will think about getting my IHCD tech course!!
jn45672 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 20:53
  #818 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 43
Likes: 4
From: uk
I didn't think you needed to be a paramedic / technician for winch operator ?
backtothebeat is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2013 | 22:12
  #819 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 56
From: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Originally Posted by backtothebeat
I didn't think you needed to be a paramedic / technician for winch operator ?
WINCH OPERATOR-EBU00408
Requirements
· one (1) year’s previous experience on a dedicated SAR unit as a Winch Operator on helicopters
· two hundred and fifty (250) hours operating experience in helicopters gained in an operational
environment similar to the intended operation
· no criminal record, safe flying record and the right to reside and work in the UK
jimf671 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2013 | 07:37
  #820 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
One would hope that the experience levels of those who are taken on will considerably exceed those minimum levels or target zero isn't going to last very long.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.