V22 Osprey discussion thread Mk II
Join Date: May 2006
Location: stateside
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My favorite quote of this whole thread is from FH1100 on the previous page
" Sooner or later people will have to admit that I'm right."
Talk about conspiracy theory, how's the tin foil hat working out?
" Sooner or later people will have to admit that I'm right."
Talk about conspiracy theory, how's the tin foil hat working out?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sans....have you ever considered what happens to a Marine that disses the Osprey in public at an air show? Can you say..."End of Career", prolonged posting to the Infantry, speedy exit from the Corps?
FH1100 says:
As even the dumbest helicopter pilot knows...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Special ops commander relieved of duty after Osprey crash in Florida
By NBC News' Courtney Kube and msnbc.com's Jeff Black
June 22, 2012, 6:53 am
MSNBC.msn.com
/ Crew walk to the U.S. Air Force CV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft at MacDill AFB in Tampa Florida in 2008.
The Air Force has fired the commander of a special operations squadron a week after a CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft in his unit crashed in Florida, NBC News confirmed on Thursday.
Lt. Col. Matt Glover, who commanded the 8th Special Operations Squadron based at Hurlburt Field in Florida, was relieved from his duties because of a loss of confidence, a military official told NBC News.
The Osprey, designed to take off and land like a helicopter and fly like a twin turboprop airplane, crashed on a training mission north of Navarre, Fla., on June 13 in a 750-square mile military training area called the Elgin Range. Five crew members were hospitalized with injuries.
On Wednesday, two of the airmen injured in the crash remained in the hospital with non-life threatening injuries, the Air Force reported. Officials are investigating.
This crash, along with a fatal MV-22 crash in Morocco in April, have raised new safety concerns among Japanese leaders and citizens ahead of an expected deployment of MV-22 Ospreys to Japan, NBC News reported. The MV-22 is the Marine Corps' version of the same aircraft.
Two Marines were killed in that crash and two more were more seriously wounded. The investigation determined that the crash was not a result of mechanical failure.
In an attempt to assuage safety concerns, several senior U.S. military officials at the Pentagon on Friday will brief a Japanese delegation on the preliminary results of the investigation into the June crash, NBC News reported.
The CV-22 Osprey’s mission is to conduct long-range infiltration, extraction and resupply missions for special operations forces, according to the U.S. Air Force web site.
The Air Force version is filled with sophisticated technology, including a missile defense system, terrain-following radar, a forward-looking infrared sensor and other electronic gear that enable it to avoid detection and defend itself on special operations missions over enemy territory, the Associated Press reported.
By NBC News' Courtney Kube and msnbc.com's Jeff Black
June 22, 2012, 6:53 am
MSNBC.msn.com
/ Crew walk to the U.S. Air Force CV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft at MacDill AFB in Tampa Florida in 2008.
The Air Force has fired the commander of a special operations squadron a week after a CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft in his unit crashed in Florida, NBC News confirmed on Thursday.
Lt. Col. Matt Glover, who commanded the 8th Special Operations Squadron based at Hurlburt Field in Florida, was relieved from his duties because of a loss of confidence, a military official told NBC News.
The Osprey, designed to take off and land like a helicopter and fly like a twin turboprop airplane, crashed on a training mission north of Navarre, Fla., on June 13 in a 750-square mile military training area called the Elgin Range. Five crew members were hospitalized with injuries.
On Wednesday, two of the airmen injured in the crash remained in the hospital with non-life threatening injuries, the Air Force reported. Officials are investigating.
This crash, along with a fatal MV-22 crash in Morocco in April, have raised new safety concerns among Japanese leaders and citizens ahead of an expected deployment of MV-22 Ospreys to Japan, NBC News reported. The MV-22 is the Marine Corps' version of the same aircraft.
Two Marines were killed in that crash and two more were more seriously wounded. The investigation determined that the crash was not a result of mechanical failure.
In an attempt to assuage safety concerns, several senior U.S. military officials at the Pentagon on Friday will brief a Japanese delegation on the preliminary results of the investigation into the June crash, NBC News reported.
The CV-22 Osprey’s mission is to conduct long-range infiltration, extraction and resupply missions for special operations forces, according to the U.S. Air Force web site.
The Air Force version is filled with sophisticated technology, including a missile defense system, terrain-following radar, a forward-looking infrared sensor and other electronic gear that enable it to avoid detection and defend itself on special operations missions over enemy territory, the Associated Press reported.
I said, "As even the dumbest helicopter pilot knows..."
20th Century replied:
Hey, you don't even thank me when I toss you the easy ones? Sheesh.
jeffg:
Ah Jeff...so ill-informed. Are you even a pilot?
Of course I know of the dangers of the dreaded turn-to-final-stall-spin. I fly airplanes, you know. But we do not use airplanes for combat insertions and the things that the V-22 will be doing. We use helicopters for those missions.
Jeff, your assertion that a trained V-22 pilot will "simply" roll the nacelles forward is so incredibly...galactically naive that it defies comprehension. Do you honestly believe that a V-22 pilot on (perhaps downwind) short-short final to an LZ...a pilot who is possibly being shot at and has a bunch of other things going on and is friggin' BUSY is going to be able to recognize incipient A-VRS and react in time by calmly beeping the nacelles forward, aborting the approach and flying away? Get outta here. Obviously you've never flown a helicopter in your life. Because if you had, you'd know that this V-22 pilot we're talking about is going to crash.
Inverted.
Killing everyone onboard.
Like happened in Marana.
And it'll be "Pilot Error."
I suspect that, deep down you know this but you don't want to admit it because you (and the other tiltrotor advocates) want SO BADLY for the V-22 to be a success. Well...sorry. A-VRS *is* the fatal flaw in the V-22 ("Fatal Flaw" being the working title of my book on the bird.) All the wishful thinking in the world will not make this problem go away.
I know the V-22 does some things that conventional helicopters or airplanes cannot. I know that the pilots who fly it are passionate about it. (Hey, one of the Air Force geeks on this forum is so "passionate" that he even went to far as to threaten my life for criticizing it! No lie. You'll notice that he does not post on here anymore.) I know that there are people who see the tiltrotor as an "advancement" of technology and who desperately want the V-22 to work. The trouble is, it's a defective design from the get-go.
Here's what's going to happen: V-22 procurement will end. Done. Over time, attrition (e.g. crashes) will whittle the fleet down to the point that they'll all be retired. (Probably around the same time the country decides that we don't need FOUR separate-but-overlapping branches of the military. But that's another discussion.) It'll be the government's way of admitting that they shoved this dangerous piece of junk down our collective throats for the economic good of the communities and companies that benefit by building it.
I just hope this happens before too many more of our pilots and soldiers are killed.
20th Century replied:
Wow, and we are fortunate enough to have you right here on PPRuNe with us to provide commentary. Aren't we lucky...
jeffg:
Yet another strawman argument from FH. No FH, a trained V-22 pilot would roll the nacelles forward and use longitudinal stick as he is trained to do.
Of course I know of the dangers of the dreaded turn-to-final-stall-spin. I fly airplanes, you know. But we do not use airplanes for combat insertions and the things that the V-22 will be doing. We use helicopters for those missions.
Jeff, your assertion that a trained V-22 pilot will "simply" roll the nacelles forward is so incredibly...galactically naive that it defies comprehension. Do you honestly believe that a V-22 pilot on (perhaps downwind) short-short final to an LZ...a pilot who is possibly being shot at and has a bunch of other things going on and is friggin' BUSY is going to be able to recognize incipient A-VRS and react in time by calmly beeping the nacelles forward, aborting the approach and flying away? Get outta here. Obviously you've never flown a helicopter in your life. Because if you had, you'd know that this V-22 pilot we're talking about is going to crash.
Inverted.
Killing everyone onboard.
Like happened in Marana.
And it'll be "Pilot Error."
I suspect that, deep down you know this but you don't want to admit it because you (and the other tiltrotor advocates) want SO BADLY for the V-22 to be a success. Well...sorry. A-VRS *is* the fatal flaw in the V-22 ("Fatal Flaw" being the working title of my book on the bird.) All the wishful thinking in the world will not make this problem go away.
I know the V-22 does some things that conventional helicopters or airplanes cannot. I know that the pilots who fly it are passionate about it. (Hey, one of the Air Force geeks on this forum is so "passionate" that he even went to far as to threaten my life for criticizing it! No lie. You'll notice that he does not post on here anymore.) I know that there are people who see the tiltrotor as an "advancement" of technology and who desperately want the V-22 to work. The trouble is, it's a defective design from the get-go.
Here's what's going to happen: V-22 procurement will end. Done. Over time, attrition (e.g. crashes) will whittle the fleet down to the point that they'll all be retired. (Probably around the same time the country decides that we don't need FOUR separate-but-overlapping branches of the military. But that's another discussion.) It'll be the government's way of admitting that they shoved this dangerous piece of junk down our collective throats for the economic good of the communities and companies that benefit by building it.
I just hope this happens before too many more of our pilots and soldiers are killed.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FH1100 says:
You're right, thanks for that. But the unfortunate truth is that everything you say are the "easy ones."
You should also be asking TukTuk BoomBoom to thank you for the conspiracy stuff that caused him to ask, "how's the tin foil hat working out?"
FH1100 says:
The answer is almost certainly 'yes' if the training was effective. And after the Marana accident which is ingrained in the minds of all Osprey pilots there should be little doubt of that. But the point is that the intense training they receive is geared much more strongly to prevent them from ever encountering the situation described as key recognition factors should alert them before entering a flight regime that would be unrecoverable (just as all pilots do whether they be in helicopters, airplanes, or tiltrotors). Having said that, a training system is only as good as its weakest link. Whether it be in helicopters, airplanes, or tiltrotors, statistics show the highest percentage of accidents are caused when someone either purposely or inadvertently does not to follow procedures or stay within limits. Training does work, but only as long as we maintain discipline and follow established practices.
A friend of mine who works for NASA experienced what he thought was the onset of VRS in the XV-15 many years before the Marana accident, and he said his reaction was instinctive and automatic as a tiltrotor pilot to push the nacelles forward. He flew out of it immediately without any consequences. Of course he was at high altitude and not under the threat of battle, but it shows as we all know that proper training can create the right mindset to allow pilots to react correctly and instinctively to situations that require immediate reaction responses.
I said, "As even the dumbest helicopter pilot knows..."
20th Century replied:
"Wow, and we are fortunate enough to have you right here on PPRuNe with us to provide commentary. Aren't we lucky..."
Hey, you don't even thank me when I toss you the easy ones? Sheesh.
20th Century replied:
"Wow, and we are fortunate enough to have you right here on PPRuNe with us to provide commentary. Aren't we lucky..."
Hey, you don't even thank me when I toss you the easy ones? Sheesh.
You should also be asking TukTuk BoomBoom to thank you for the conspiracy stuff that caused him to ask, "how's the tin foil hat working out?"
FH1100 says:
Do you honestly believe that a V-22 pilot on (perhaps downwind) short-short final to an LZ...a pilot who is possibly being shot at and has a bunch of other things going on and is friggin' BUSY is going to be able to recognize incipient A-VRS and react in time by calmly beeping the nacelles forward, aborting the approach and flying away?
A friend of mine who works for NASA experienced what he thought was the onset of VRS in the XV-15 many years before the Marana accident, and he said his reaction was instinctive and automatic as a tiltrotor pilot to push the nacelles forward. He flew out of it immediately without any consequences. Of course he was at high altitude and not under the threat of battle, but it shows as we all know that proper training can create the right mindset to allow pilots to react correctly and instinctively to situations that require immediate reaction responses.
Tell me one aircraft for which this isn't true ?
Happened to the Phantom as well...
Again:
At some point in time that will happen.
Maybe in 40 years from now...
Seriously, why should this thing be retired prematurely. Once the high initial procurement cost (we are in no disagreement about the fact that it is an EXPENSIVE kit) has been swallowed it makes sense to utilise such an expensive and valuable equipment to the max.
And expect exactly that to happen.
Happened to the Phantom as well...
Over time, attrition (e.g. crashes) will whittle the fleet down to the point that they'll all be retired.
At some point in time that will happen.
Maybe in 40 years from now...
Seriously, why should this thing be retired prematurely. Once the high initial procurement cost (we are in no disagreement about the fact that it is an EXPENSIVE kit) has been swallowed it makes sense to utilise such an expensive and valuable equipment to the max.
And expect exactly that to happen.
(Hey, one of the Air Force geeks on this forum is so "passionate" that he even went to far as to threaten my life for criticizing it! No lie. You'll notice that he does not post on here anymore.)
Ah Jeff...so ill-informed. Are you even a pilot?
Jeff, your assertion that a trained V-22 pilot will "simply" roll the nacelles forward is so incredibly...galactically naive that it defies comprehension. Do you honestly believe that a V-22 pilot on (perhaps downwind) short-short final to an LZ...a pilot who is possibly being shot at and has a bunch of other things going on and is friggin' BUSY is going to be able to recognize incipient A-VRS and react in time by calmly beeping the nacelles forward, aborting the approach and flying away? Get outta here. Obviously you've never flown a helicopter in your life. Because if you had, you'd know that this V-22 pilot we're talking about is going to crash.
So once again FH why don't you tell us all here what your qualifications are that allow you to post such passionate and omniscient arguments?? Are you an instructor? How much tactical flying experience do you have? Mult-engine experience? Heavy helicopters? Formal training programs attended? NVG experience? Formation flying? When did you attend test pilot school? Are you even instrument rated?
Comments such as yours come from two types of people: 1) Experienced and educated individuals who know what they're talking about but may not always use the best approach, and 2) Windbags wanting everyone to listen to them yet show their a$$es everytime they open their mouths because they feel they have all the answers and refuse to accept anyone else's arguments. I'll let others on this board be the judge.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: here
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jeff, your assertion that a trained V-22 pilot will "simply" roll the nacelles forward is so incredibly...galactically naive that it defies comprehension.
Do you honestly believe that a V-22 pilot on (perhaps downwind) short-short final to an LZ...a pilot who is possibly being shot at
and has a bunch of other things going on and is friggin' BUSY
is going to be able to recognize incipient A-VRS and react in time by calmly beeping the nacelles forward, aborting the approach and flying away? Get outta here.
By the way I found that in combat (yes I actually have been there, have you) that the tougher things got the calmer most pilots seemed to get. Perhaps SAS has thoughts on that to.
Obviously you've never flown a helicopter in your life.
Because if you had, you'd know that this V-22 pilot we're talking about is going to crash.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are several PPRuNe members who can attest otherwise.
I can attest that he was a military helicopter who flew in combat.
Jeffg,
Educate us on "Roll Off" and the procedures taught to avoid encountering it....and procedures taught to react to it when it happens if you would?
Also....what are the symptoms of "Roll Off" as compared to "A-VRS" if it were to occur in a formation approach to landing situation......say as at the Marana crash?
Could the Marana crash actually have been "Roll Off"?
Educate us on "Roll Off" and the procedures taught to avoid encountering it....and procedures taught to react to it when it happens if you would?
Also....what are the symptoms of "Roll Off" as compared to "A-VRS" if it were to occur in a formation approach to landing situation......say as at the Marana crash?
Could the Marana crash actually have been "Roll Off"?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sort of an Iron Man was he 21st? A Transformer perhaps?
But "Roll Off" is the serious topic of the day (I believe it has been discussed previously on this thread).
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UAE
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sas,
I know you are sitting back in your arm chair with laptop at the ready, with one hand on the computer and the other on one of those green rum drinks. But if you demand:
It is not likely to be received as the best way to engage in a two way conversation amongst professionals. How would you respond if JeffG demanded that you educate us on a question he wanted answered in that manner??
21stC
PS: Got the 'Transformer joke' and added the word 'pilot'!
I know you are sitting back in your arm chair with laptop at the ready, with one hand on the computer and the other on one of those green rum drinks. But if you demand:
Jeffg, Educate us on "Roll Off" and the procedures taught to avoid encountering it....
21stC
PS: Got the 'Transformer joke' and added the word 'pilot'!
21st,
As most of us are not Osprey Pilots...and jeffg is....I was hoping he would be able to explain that situation to us. Nothing sinister in that is there?
My use of the word "educate" was meant to put Jeffg into the position of Teacher....and the rest of us who are not knowing....as Students.
As most of us are not Osprey Pilots...and jeffg is....I was hoping he would be able to explain that situation to us. Nothing sinister in that is there?
My use of the word "educate" was meant to put Jeffg into the position of Teacher....and the rest of us who are not knowing....as Students.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: here
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAS
First and foremost let me state that my V-22 time totals exactly 0.0 hours. 21st speaks of my personal and professional associations with those in the V-22 community from a time when a program I was on shared hangar 109 with the V-22 program, and afterward. Both 21st and I count among our personal and professional friendships one of the very few individuals who has significant time in the the XV, V-22 and 609.
As far as being educated you had that opportunity when Mckpave first started posting on here. Mckpave is a V-22 pilot and is very knowledgeable about the platform. He was very forth coming and tried to answer questions only to be accused of doing otherwise when certain individuals didn't like the answers he gave. Your insinuation that V-22 pilots are either so enamored with the aircraft that they can't see the forest for the trees or that they are afraid about their careers couldn't be further from the truth. Every V-22 pilot I know will tell you that the V-22 has it's warts (what aircraft doesn't), and of it's strengths. They will all also attest that if flown within the limits established in the NATOPS it can and will safely complete the mission it is tasked to do. Go beyond those limits and it will bite (what aircraft doesn't).
Here's my frustration with this thread; I'll give you an example: I've flown CASEVAC missions, I've landed in some very small LZs, I've flown NVGs, etc. I've flown just about every component of an EMS mission. Yet I wouldn't go on an EMS thread and contrive a scenario and tell a group of EMS pilots that someday they would have to admit that I was right. I wouldn't do it because I'm not an EMS pilot! I don't know anything about the pressures that are placed upon them, their scheduling, training, etc. I would look like a fool if I did, wouldn't I? Likewise FH obviously never served, had any form of tactical flight training or practical experience and doesn't know a thing about tiltrotors other than what he has gleaned from the world wide web. For him to come up with a contrived scenario that meets his predetermined outcome (based on false assumptions) in a forum which holds as it's members many like yourself who have served, have been trained and have the practical experience (some in the V-22) and then tell them that someday they will have to admit he is right I find foolhardy.
If anyone truly wants to be educated about the V-22 then the next time someone like Mckpave post they should take the opportunity to listen to what they say and not accuse them of lying, covering up or being part of some vast conspiracy to hide the facts. It's hard to be a student if you've decided the teacher is wrong before they've entered the classroom.
First and foremost let me state that my V-22 time totals exactly 0.0 hours. 21st speaks of my personal and professional associations with those in the V-22 community from a time when a program I was on shared hangar 109 with the V-22 program, and afterward. Both 21st and I count among our personal and professional friendships one of the very few individuals who has significant time in the the XV, V-22 and 609.
As far as being educated you had that opportunity when Mckpave first started posting on here. Mckpave is a V-22 pilot and is very knowledgeable about the platform. He was very forth coming and tried to answer questions only to be accused of doing otherwise when certain individuals didn't like the answers he gave. Your insinuation that V-22 pilots are either so enamored with the aircraft that they can't see the forest for the trees or that they are afraid about their careers couldn't be further from the truth. Every V-22 pilot I know will tell you that the V-22 has it's warts (what aircraft doesn't), and of it's strengths. They will all also attest that if flown within the limits established in the NATOPS it can and will safely complete the mission it is tasked to do. Go beyond those limits and it will bite (what aircraft doesn't).
Here's my frustration with this thread; I'll give you an example: I've flown CASEVAC missions, I've landed in some very small LZs, I've flown NVGs, etc. I've flown just about every component of an EMS mission. Yet I wouldn't go on an EMS thread and contrive a scenario and tell a group of EMS pilots that someday they would have to admit that I was right. I wouldn't do it because I'm not an EMS pilot! I don't know anything about the pressures that are placed upon them, their scheduling, training, etc. I would look like a fool if I did, wouldn't I? Likewise FH obviously never served, had any form of tactical flight training or practical experience and doesn't know a thing about tiltrotors other than what he has gleaned from the world wide web. For him to come up with a contrived scenario that meets his predetermined outcome (based on false assumptions) in a forum which holds as it's members many like yourself who have served, have been trained and have the practical experience (some in the V-22) and then tell them that someday they will have to admit he is right I find foolhardy.
If anyone truly wants to be educated about the V-22 then the next time someone like Mckpave post they should take the opportunity to listen to what they say and not accuse them of lying, covering up or being part of some vast conspiracy to hide the facts. It's hard to be a student if you've decided the teacher is wrong before they've entered the classroom.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: stateside
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good comments there.
I agree this thread could be really interesting and informative instead its been taken over by a couple of loud mouths not associated with V-22s in any way that spend the whole time telling everyone else stuff theyve read on the web.
When people that are clearly close to the program comment they are quickly drowned out by these two know it all idiots.
FH1100 and Sasless should put a sock in it and let the guys that know tell it.
I agree this thread could be really interesting and informative instead its been taken over by a couple of loud mouths not associated with V-22s in any way that spend the whole time telling everyone else stuff theyve read on the web.
When people that are clearly close to the program comment they are quickly drowned out by these two know it all idiots.
FH1100 and Sasless should put a sock in it and let the guys that know tell it.
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Senior Pilot,
If a poster sends a private message that shows their personal agenda despite what the truth is then it is fair game and for all on this forum to see.
TC
No, quoting and referencing PM's is not "fair game". Endof
SP
If a poster sends a private message that shows their personal agenda despite what the truth is then it is fair game and for all on this forum to see.
TC
No, quoting and referencing PM's is not "fair game". Endof
SP