Shell award CHC CNS contract
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shell award CHC CNS contract
Just heard a rumour that CHC have signed a contract with Shell in the CNS. Anyone care to elabotrate?
Last edited by Brom; 29th Jun 2012 at 18:22.
Elabotrate....a popular description of the methodology used in the writing of SM's pprune Resume'!
Last edited by SASless; 30th Jun 2012 at 13:29.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well if they have doubtless that well known troll Shell Management will be on here soon endorsing and condemning the decision
Sadly, your prayers are answered. Did take him quite a while though.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The continent
Age: 12
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SM, what happened to your statement that Shell was moving towards the smaller and agile operators because they provided a better service and were easier to influence.
You let us believe that Shell was done with the big fat and complacent operators
Now you say that Shell gave CHC the opportunity to shine
Or is this the other voice in your head?
You let us believe that Shell was done with the big fat and complacent operators
Now you say that Shell gave CHC the opportunity to shine
Or is this the other voice in your head?
For what it's worth, I'm given to understand that SM is a retired Shell engineer. In fact one of my colleagues has met him and knows his name, although he's obviously not going to divulge it. Neither would I, if I knew.
However the fact that SM is retired might be the reason why he seems to feel that he can pontificate on helicopter issues and make statements that his erstwhile employer would never sanction nor endorse.
To me his utterances exhibit a modicum of disloyalty to the "hand that feeds him", although perhaps there are one or two of his former colleagues who share his views. Still, I think he's not doing Shell any favours.
As before, I won't be entering into any communications with him at any level, particularly as I have no ambition to be dragged down.
However the fact that SM is retired might be the reason why he seems to feel that he can pontificate on helicopter issues and make statements that his erstwhile employer would never sanction nor endorse.
To me his utterances exhibit a modicum of disloyalty to the "hand that feeds him", although perhaps there are one or two of his former colleagues who share his views. Still, I think he's not doing Shell any favours.
As before, I won't be entering into any communications with him at any level, particularly as I have no ambition to be dragged down.
