Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Apr 2011, 00:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: somewhere
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Safety

As a former employee of a global company providing helicopter services to the offshore oil and gas industry, I feel it is my responsibility to bring to the attention of the wider aviation community a very worrying "initiative" this company has introduced - forcing engineers/technicians to wear helmets while working on the A/C. Now this might sound like a good idea, but in fact it is an extremely dangerous thing to have in the workplace. As we are all aware, one of the most significant contributors to maintenance errors is distractions, and the wearing of helmets is a major distraction. They significantly limit the engineers/technicians access and ability to carryout inspections thourouly, they cause a significant discomfort - headaches etc (distraction), they are ill fitting (distraction), they can't wear hats or appropriate hearing protection when wearing a helmet and they cause heat stress in hot & humid environments (distraction) etc etc. On top of all this, they are (engineers/technicians) are constantly threatened with there jobs if they remove there helmets or even raise concerns about them!
In my opinion all this is a serious safety concern and the wearing of helmets by engineering/maintenance staff should be prevented and/or removed from the aviation industry before its too late!
helmetsafety is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 08:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Beside the seaside
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The top of a 332 is a long way to fall and I personally know of 2 engineers who have misjudged handholds and slipped. One died and the other sustained a fractured skull and it still off work.

If you can think of another form of protection then suggest it to the company. Otherwise I am afraid that in today's 'Elf and Safety conscious 'Target Zero' work environment you will just have to accept it.
Epiphany is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 15:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KOLM and KBVS
Age: 52
Posts: 274
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'll be the first to argue against some levels of H&S nannyisms, but really:

1. they cause a significant discomfort - headaches etc (distraction)

That's a fitting issue. Argue for better fitting.

2. they are ill fitting (distraction)

See above.

3. they can't wear hats or

Which means what, exactly? That they can't keep the sun out of their eyes?

4. appropriate hearing protection when wearing a helmet and

The US Navy cranials allow for soft earplugs to be worn in addition to Mickey Mouse earmuffs. In fact, the last time I was on a carrier deck it was required to do so. If, in fact, your company's chosen headgear doesn't allow for an appropriate level of noise reduction, then your company has chosen the incorrect appliance - argue for a better design.

5. they cause heat stress in hot & humid environments (distraction)

They don't cause heat stress - heat does. The risk/benefit argument comes into play here, and ultimately duty time limits and rest cycles may need to be addressed depending on the work environment.

A private corporation only has to pay out a few compensation claims before the provisioning of head protection becomes an attractive expenditure. If a company has decided to invest in protective headgear and you argue against it in favor of ballcaps, you will lose that argument. If you argue in favor of intelligent design and proper fitting, you may find a compromise that makes more sense.
Hedge36 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 15:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Posts: 1,959
Received 50 Likes on 15 Posts
I heard a rumor that the pilots are required to wear "bicycle helmets" while pre-flighting. If this is the case, then I agree with your arguments.
Gordy is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 16:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No rumor!
When you step up onto that S300 to have a look in the fuel tank you wear a yellow bike helmet.
In fact, you're supposed to wear a helmet whenever your feet leave the ground...
Applies to everybody, students, instructors, technicians.
GoodGrief is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 16:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KOLM and KBVS
Age: 52
Posts: 274
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's pretty nutty, I'll admit. However, "...the wearing of helmets by engineering/maintenance staff should be prevented and/or removed from the aviation industry before its too late!" is a bit of a stretch.
Hedge36 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2011, 16:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Posts: 1,959
Received 50 Likes on 15 Posts
When you step up onto that S300 to have a look in the fuel tank you wear a yellow bike helmet.
That's pretty nutty, I'll admit.
I do believe this is the point the OP tried to make but did not fully explain.
Gordy is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2011, 22:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
this is a serious safety concern and the wearing of helmets by engineering/maintenance staff should be prevented and/or removed from the aviation industry before its too late!
I'm with you! this unacceptable! (see below)
link

Regards
Aser
Aser is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2011, 22:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Inside the Industry
Posts: 876
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That highlights the problem ASER, how can anyone work when being distracted by helmets like that?
industry insider is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2011, 02:01
  #10 (permalink)  
Chief Bottle Washer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: PPRuNe
Posts: 5,137
Received 183 Likes on 111 Posts
What helmet?

Senior Pilot is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2011, 07:05
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: vocation
Age: 57
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well her head is protected, but do those stilettos conform to EN-345?
HOGE is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.