PPRuNe Forums

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th Jul 2011, 23:57   #41 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PLANET ZOG
Posts: 298
still needing a job!

You and one or two others.

3D CAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 01:10   #42 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In England
Posts: 373
Iain dear old chap...i hope you dont count your rounds in the way you count your previous jobs! I dont think my sight and mathematics are failing me...but surely there are only 4.....so maybe it was only 3 out of 4 you meant...I am begining to think UK SAR procurement is becoming like the proposed badger cull.....we all know we need it....but hey lets hope its not 12 years before we see some action.....oops....its already 10!
Tallsar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 01:27   #43 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: PLANET ZOG
Posts: 298

but if you need a SAR pilot, or a bloke who worked on the Cyprus COMR bids, the interim CG SAR contract and SAR-H itself, I'm still available.

Is'nt that why we are in this situation now.

Or was that comment tongue in cheek?? I do hope so.

3D CAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 04:33   #44 (permalink)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: All over the place
Posts: 157
Have any criminal charges or sanctions been applied to the companies and individuals involved in this abhorrent fiasco that occurred during the SAR-H bid process? It appears that an obscene amount of both tax-payers, and competing bidders, money was lost in an apparent bid fixing conspiracy of a scale and standard more typically found in corrupt third world dictatorships, rather than the UK.

It would certainly make me feel much better to know that the guilty are being investigated and that appropriate action is being taken to remedy the original faults and ensure a fair bid for the next phase.

Is there an investigation actually occurring at this time?

Is there jail time in anyone's future?
rotor-rooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 12:26   #45 (permalink)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 6
Looking forward rather than backwards, what would be the chances of doing something 'joint' with the Irish here? The SAR helicopters of both countries are always in and out of each others Search and Rescue Regions anyway.
Oneclub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 12:33   #46 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 263
Not sure that would work out with the irish having just let a 10 year contract. I think the politics of having two government departments involved are massive, let alone having two countries involved. But then again, if we are going to put British fast jet pilots onto French aircraft carriers I guess anything is possible!!!
Max Contingency is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 15:36   #47 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 360
If the UK Government wants to pick up the tab on the Irish contract for a year or two, I'm sure the so-called Irish Government would be happy to have the new Sikorskys based in the UK for a while. It would save us a lot of money, and given the way they are shutting down hospitals here at the moment, a lack of SAR cover in Ireland wouldn't be too much of a concern to them. If only we hadn't sold the Alouette IIIs so quickly.

500 Fan.
500 Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 15:38   #48 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,406
Crabs working for a living down the FI.

House of Commons - Hansard - 11th July 2011:

Search and Rescue Interim Contract
The Secretary of State for Transport (Mr Philip Hammond): On 8 February I informed the House that, owing to irregularities in the bidding process, the Government had concluded that it was not appropriate to proceed with the previously planned joint MOD/DFT PFI procurement for future search and rescue capability.

The investigation into the circumstances that led to the cancellation of that procurement is ongoing. Work is also under way to identify the optimum procurement options for the long-term provision of search and rescue helicopter capability for the UK. However, as the existing Maritime and Coastguard Agency search and rescue helicopter contract that provides services at Portland, Lee on Solent, Shetland and the Isle of Lewis is set to expire, I wish to inform the House of my plans to ensure that search and rescue helicopter services from these locations continue uninterrupted until new long-term arrangements are in place.

To ensure the continuity of services from these locations, the Department for Transport will shortly run a competition to procure an interim service for a period of up to five years. This contract will be similar to the arrangements that are currently in place for these bases and are working well. The contract will be open to all interested bidders able to offer a service that fully meets our requirements and ensures the safety of the public and seafarers.

These arrangements will ensure that search and rescue helicopter services are maintained while the range of options in relation to the long-term future provision of such services are being fully considered. The Royal Air Force and Royal Navy will continue to provide coverage from their search and rescue bases as at present, while I consider the options for the long-term provision of search and rescue helicopter capability.

I will inform the House later in the year of the Government’s intentions for the longer term. The procurement strategy we adopt for the longer term will seek to ensure that the Ministry of Defence is able to complete its previously announced intention to withdraw its Sea Kings from service in 2016.
The JetStream contract in 2003 was seriously compacted within 12 months - so it can be done [I agree its more of an apples and pears comparison - but the capability is there if needed].

What it requires is a winning bidder to come up with a shed load of 'new' cabs over say a 2 year period and a training school to boot. The training is the difficult bit (finding bums on seats in sufficient quantities that are both qualified and available).
My hunch is that the DfT (if they still had possession of the poisoned chalice) will remove the mil in its entirety and hope (ha) that sufficient numbers PVR to join the new service.

Statement due 2012 (early), infrastructure in place by mid to late 2013 - training complete by early to mid 2016: Roberts your mothers brother
Thomas coupling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th Jul 2011, 23:48   #49 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In England
Posts: 373
TC -as far as i can see from your comments, there is apparently little sense in running 2 competitions in such a short timescale...by definition it is likely that tax payers money will end up being spent inefficiently at a time we can least afford it. It will be used to pay for a 5 year Interm 2 contract which in the end may have no direct relationship as far as resources and aircraft are concerned with what comes after for the longer term. Cant help feel a lot of additional time and cash is about to be wasted due to some distinct risk averse decision making somewhere! goodness knows
the SAR-H solution and assessment must still give them the most pertinent clues to be able to get on with it quicker!
Tallsar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th Jul 2011, 08:35   #50 (permalink)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 41
I was hoping this would all be sorted out before the Euro collasped, oh well
IrishSarBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 16:35   #51 (permalink)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: EGPB/EGPD
Posts: 130
Was hearing a rumour that Bristows think they are in with a good chance!
shetlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th Jul 2011, 00:18   #52 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Europe
Age: 6
Posts: 20

Wonder is that the same Bristow who told their employees that given CHC were preferred bidder last year for SARH that they would be awarded the Irish contract by default.....

Or the same Bristow who indicated that there was an opportunity earlier this year to takeover the present UK SAR contract at short notice before year end.....

Or the same Bristow who were recently convinced they were the front runner for the Aberdeen based Total O&G contract.....

Sumpor Stylee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th Jul 2011, 01:00   #53 (permalink)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Escaped from ABZ...
Posts: 278
I'm sure that both Bond and CHC will be claiming that they are front-runners as well.

Anyone like to speculate as to what the solution might be for the S Coast?

Would CHC bid with S92s or 139s for the S Coast?
detgnome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th Jul 2011, 12:21   #54 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 158
Just to add fuel to the fire..........

From the Daily Mail

Brussels launches plan to scupper UK Coastguard
17th July 2011

Britain's coastguards would be replaced by a new pan- European fleet under 'harmonisation' plans which would see their life-saving work being taken over by an EU coastguard corps emblazoned with the Brussels logo.
The news comes just days after Transport Secretary Philip Hammond performed a partial U-turn on cutting the number of currently operating Coastguard centres from 19 to eight, with just three remaining open 24 hours a day.
After an outcry over the safety risks, he told the Commons last week that 11 centres will remain, all of which will be operational 24 hours a day.

Under the Brussels plan, which will be voted on by the European Parliament in October, an EU Coastguard will be created to 'effectively combat current or future dangers at sea such as terrorism, piracy and trafficking'.
If approved, it would then be put before EU member countries for ratification.
Trevor Coleman, MEP for the South West of England, who uncovered the proposals, said: 'A European Coastguard service would contribute, we were told, towards the single European state "we dream of" and that "member states need to contribute to these structures and relinquish some of their power."
'No one spoke of local knowledge or the use of volunteer Coastwatch personnel.'

Partial U-turn: An outcry forced Philip Hammond, the Transport Secretary, to reverse Coastguard station cuts
UKIP leader and South East England MEP Nigel Farage said: 'We've already had our fishing rights taken away from us. Wanting us to relinquish control of our own marine borders simply must be taken off the agenda at the earliest possible opportunity.
'We've already seen the EU embassies take hold, and seen the EU try to take over defence. And immigration has been a disaster for years because of European rules'.
A spokesman for the European Parliament said: 'Once it is approved by the Parliament as a whole, it will be forwarded to the Commission, Council and Member States. The Commission then may come up with legislative proposals or take measures based on the content of the report.'
Tory Shipping Minister Mike Penning said the proposals would be resisted by the UK Government.
He added: 'A European Coastguard is not a concept that the UK would support. Her Majesty's Coastguard has a long and proud history and has a worldwide reputation for excellence.
902Jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th Jul 2011, 12:43   #55 (permalink)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 263
I'm going to put my head above the trench first!

Search and Rescue should not recognise International Boundaries.

I know the MCA does many things other than SAR but I personally have no issue with a European Coastguard. The individual nations all work from the same manuals (IAMSAR) and they spend considerable time and money every year on joint exercises and workshops to try and harmonise their plans and procedures.

My Licence says JAA and my Flight Plans go to Eurocontrol. Now if we could just get the CAA abolished with the introduction of EASA.......
Max Contingency is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th Jul 2011, 21:41   #56 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 604
EU Coastguard to fight terror, piracy And trafficking........ Surely this is the domain of the military..?
Could be the last? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th Jul 2011, 10:23   #57 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: in a state of flux
Posts: 76
The comments from hansard should be read for what they do not say. The quote states that the procurement strategy will allow the MOD to still meet it's aspiration to withdraw it's Seakings in 2016. It does not say that they will not then be replaced with a new buy,and for SAR to stay Mil. Which a little birdie (an MP) tells me is currently being looked at. Read the Hansard statement again, it is very cleverly worded...does not say SAR will be civvy, and does not say Seaking won't be replaced in the Mil SAR role.
chopabeefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th Jul 2011, 14:04   #58 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 604
If the contract identified that the Seakings would be replaced with the S92, and CHC were already in the process of procuring the ac, can't the mil take up where CHC failed?

The precedent has already been made with the COMR ac used by 84 Sqn, and I am told that it works very well. Therefore, rather than going back through the bidding process again, just replicate that contract and retain mil crews and save a stack of money, plus various other PR benefits of keeping the capability military.

But more importantly, we can paint the ac yellow!!!!

Could be the last? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th Jul 2011, 16:03   #59 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cornwall and here and there
Age: 69
Posts: 1,285

They would look a lot better in Dark Blue

Geoffersincornwall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th Jul 2011, 08:42   #60 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: in the training office
Posts: 232
The investigation into the circumstances that led to the cancellation of that procurement is ongoing.
Has "Don't worry .... I'll be back" shown up anywhere yet?
Adam Nams is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39.

© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1