Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

R66 Turbine - Could It Be Better?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

R66 Turbine - Could It Be Better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2010, 10:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R66 Turbine - Could It Be Better?

With the R44 you got a 100% increase in capacity but the R66 .. what a let down!

Doesn't old man Robinson (aka Frank the *ank) realise that having delivered economy we now want MORE SPACE and just a little bit of style!



If he was unable to extend or broaden this helo then couldn't he have bought the rights (they'd probably give them away) for the arcane FH100 and applied his economy engines, simple designs and composite components to it!

At least we would have had space for pax plus a back pack and just the tiniest amount of style!



I don't know how your British distributor does it ... selling both the ugliest and most attractive helicopters on the market!
Yellow & Blue Baron is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 10:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Robinson RH100 ???

Interesting idea Swedish PpRuNe - A Robinson RH1100!

The FH1100 never really seemed to penetrate the market but was in the running (so I recall) with the Hughes 500C and Bell 206 - they all emerged around the same time.

If I'm not mistaken there have been several attempts to revive the 1100 but its just never caught on. I believe they even made an attempt at making it more pretty with some sort of nose mod.

There was a very public indicent in the early days involving an 1100 (can't remember the details) but I think it was an airshow and this may have put people off.

You're right about the Robo's space limitations and lack of design - very sad.
Hell Man is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 11:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RH1100

For starting American desiner he throw away middle gearbox for FH1100 tail rotor because this cost money. Then you must push tail boom up or keep it low and sell helicopter for also cutting grass - in Russia R22 is cosidered for this purpose hey hey ...

The langing system is also heavy for Robinson must make from tube aluminum and everything must not be heavy and all inside fittings become very cheap - then it can become Robinson 1100.
moscovite is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 13:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: in the office
Age: 44
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Y&BB are you aware the R66 has a seperate baggage compartment capable of fitting a number of largish suitcases in or more than one set of golf clubs plus a couple of bags or even a full sized adult, and no I won't be posting that picture...! So your pax with a backpack will not be an issue.
Tallguy is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 14:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was a good aircraft, HellMan the public accident you are referring to is probably the one that happened at an airshow, during a demonstration the aircraft had a tail rotor failure in flight and the aircraft destroyed itself before hitting the ground.

There is a video of it and I have seen it, don't remember where but it could be on youtube.

JD
fijdor is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 15:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Posts: 1,960
Received 50 Likes on 15 Posts
This one:

Gordy is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 22:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
R66 has a 5th seat and a baggage compartment - what more could you ask for?
krypton_john is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2010, 23:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,850
Received 57 Likes on 38 Posts
A Type Certificate?
RVDT is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 00:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, a fifth middle seat that only a midget could fit on.
Just admit robinson have produced a R44 with a turbine, one midget seat and bagage space for one adult or two midgets.

fluffy
fluffy5 is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 02:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 956
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Are the back seats *that* much worse than than that that in a B206? Or a 500?

Anyone actually sat in one yet?
krypton_john is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 08:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
KJ

Yes but the 206 and 500 were designed in the early 1960's 50 years ago !
Both products will outfly a Robinson product, shows how good thigs were in the 60'S
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 00:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The land of the cranberry
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both products will outfly a Robinson product, shows how good thigs were in the 60'S
I've often screamed passed a Jetranger in a 44. One time I was heading into the mountains flying a 44 and a jetranger beside me for an aerial survey. They had to ask us to slow down. We were at full capacity too!
Trans Lift is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 01:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yellow Brick Road
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally I prefer the 206 over the R44/66 any day. It's not just about speed.

Bear in mind that Frank is not growing younger every day and probably does not want to re-invent the wheel, hence the R66.
ReverseFlight is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 01:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tell us reverseflight, what is the r66 like to fly? Frank keeps the design simple to keep cost, weight and maintenance down which are all essential to make the thing work and actually make a profit.
stix is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 05:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,949
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 26 Posts
Translift

Bet you havent screamed past a 500
Hughes500 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 07:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gordy: Thanks for the clip - depressing.

I'm wondering whether a t/r failure while entering a climbing left turn at moderate speed would result in the same outcome for most helo types - any views?

Trans Lift:
I've often screamed passed a Jetranger in a 44.
I'm trying to imagine this, but ... I can't!

Y&BB:
old man Robinson (aka Frank the *ank)
Swedish PPRuNE ... why the disrespect???

Last edited by Hell Man; 17th Jun 2010 at 07:29.
Hell Man is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 07:21
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still think the FH1100 is a better alternative than the R66.

Hell Man - (my old sparring partner) - good idea to edit instead of adding more posts!

Old man Robinson's nick name is not a disrespect and not a reference to some form of self pleasure but originates from the early days when he was considering a Wankel engine before he selected the Lycoming!

Last edited by Yellow & Blue Baron; 17th Jun 2010 at 07:36.
Yellow & Blue Baron is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 10:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: england
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dissing the 66

Blimy Guys,

have you ever considered how easy it is to bitch about a helicopter (in this case the R66) as opposed to designing, building, certifying, selling, supporting one?

Give credit where credit is due -- Robinson is one of the few helicopters that was born out of private finance, as opposed to billions of dollars of tax payers money through military contracts.

We are all entitled to our subjective opinions on the merits of any particular design, but the only guys that I know on this forum that has earnt the right to comment on the good/bad design is BudDevHeli, and possibly Bruno Guimbal - the guy who has designed and built and certified the Cabri.


They are the do-ers, we are the whingers.

Big Ls.
biggles99 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 10:52
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear BudDevHeli & Bruno Guimbal,

Biggles99 says says you are the only two people on PPRuNe to have earned the right to comment on whether a helicopter design is good or bad.

Because I am only a whinger, could you kindly express your views as to whether the newly turbine powered R66 (marketed as a revolutionary step up from the R44) is in fact a revolutionary step up from the R44!

To most of us whingers it appears as nothing more than an R44 with a turbine engine and, in which case (in whinger-speak) might better have been marketed as the R44T (or similar).

Also, if you have the time, do you think - in your well considered right to comment - that the ancient FH1100 could be revamped to offer a better alternative than the R66?

Whingingly yours

Y&BB
Stockholm
Sweden
Yellow & Blue Baron is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2010, 11:02
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swedish - why don't you buy an FH1100?
Hell Man is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.