Puma Gearbox Checks
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ****
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Puma Gearbox Checks
What is the latest round of Puma gearbox checks all about ? Just heard all N Sea operators have speng the last week checking gear boxes out on local radio ? A reaction to Nigerian ditching ?
NST
NST
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Aberdeenshire
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gearbox Problem
This problem goes back to 2005, when the gutter which directs water away from the Intermediate Gearbox, came adrift and chafed on the inclined driveshaft. There was a modification to the fastening of the gutter, which I think was carried out by all N Sea operators. However this has not completely fixed the original problem so Eurocopter are back to the drawing board and Operators have a frequent inspection of the problem area....again.
ScotiaQ
ScotiaQ
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"New" EASA Emergency Service Bulletin
Yes, all the "new" emergency bulletin does is reduce the inspection period. You'll have to go a long way to find a bigger non-event; but I suppose it gives the local press something else to dutifully scare the offshore community & their families about for no good reason. Nice job jurnos, it must make you very proud to know that in making a story out of nothing you're giving the gift of a seasonal reminder to the friends and families of those affected last year. Spitting Image had your characters spot on.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South of France
Age: 72
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very good answers, really!
Almost about the Press!!!They need to write something, without regarding if it's a big block of sh-t
Happy New year from south of France from the Frenchie who where in ABZ for CHC Super Pumas in H1 hangar
Almost about the Press!!!They need to write something, without regarding if it's a big block of sh-t
Happy New year from south of France from the Frenchie who where in ABZ for CHC Super Pumas in H1 hangar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
4 Posts
Why is it ncessary to give the press such a hard time. Wake up and realise that without incidents being reported the ability to effect change or motivate a very lazy manufacturer to get off its arse and fix things is very limited.
It does not really matter if the reporting is accurate its the fact that the press will always leap on to events like this that keeps the issues in the public conciousness.
Just look at the lack of progress in the Nigerian ditching. They must all know by now what caused the ditching yet without the pressure from outside agencies to force them to reveal what they know we are all left in the dark.
It does not really matter if the reporting is accurate its the fact that the press will always leap on to events like this that keeps the issues in the public conciousness.
Just look at the lack of progress in the Nigerian ditching. They must all know by now what caused the ditching yet without the pressure from outside agencies to force them to reveal what they know we are all left in the dark.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get me wrong....
I have no issue with the media reporting real issues, accurately or updating on progress with an investigation when there is something to actually report. I just don't see how turning a routine change to an inspection into the headline "Further safety alert for Super Puma helicopters as fresh checks ordered - mechanical problem found with gearbox part which can leave pilots without proper control" is helpful to anyone (except printers!) nor indeed does it put any pressure on ECF as its a known issue that they're on top of. I can however see how the words "safety alert", "mechanical problem" and "gearbox part" are not helpful to some people right now...
About the "lack of progress" in the Nigerian ditching. Was that not only three weeks ago? Perhaps wake up and realise (your words!) that seemingly straightforward investigations, even with a walking talking crew, can take a bit longer than that if done properly...unless of course you just want to blame them for a nice, quick, outcome?
About the "lack of progress" in the Nigerian ditching. Was that not only three weeks ago? Perhaps wake up and realise (your words!) that seemingly straightforward investigations, even with a walking talking crew, can take a bit longer than that if done properly...unless of course you just want to blame them for a nice, quick, outcome?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK and MALTA
Age: 61
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
4 Posts
SCOTSHELI,
Blaming "Someone" for an accident (with the exception of the nutter shouting "Geronimo" and pushing the cyclic at the sea) is beyond simplistic.
This thread was assumed to be closely linked to the PUMA Nigerian Ditching, maybe it is an unrelated issue to the ALERT INSPECTION fix described here in this thread (or is it!!!)
All accidents start with a root cause and probably some contributary factors. What I want is a quick interim report to suggest what may have caused the accident, ie no mechanical failure, or yes we the crew deliberatley ditched due to "X" happening in the final stages of the approach.
Whether you like it or not, there are two walking talking crewmembers in the Nigerian Incident who I suspect know the prime causal factor if not the underlying cause.
With a handle like SCOTSHELI, I guess you are employed on the NS, and if that is the case AND you fly the AS332 family you are you really happy to have to wait over a year for official reports to be released (as we are still waiting for the JSAR report).
I do not want to blame anyone, I simply do not want to have the same thing happen to me, even if it is a crew issue!!!!!
I can always count on a two-bit gob-sh**te to cry "Blame Blame" whenever anyone on these forums presses for answers. Or if not doing that, slagging off the press for doing their job!!
Its attitudes like yours that allow Commercial Operators, and/or Manufacturers to delay findings so long that the impact of the original issue, and therefore the need to properly fix the problem, are severely diluted.
I suggest you remove your head from the sand (if you are a NS jockey) and see the real issues here.
DB
Blaming "Someone" for an accident (with the exception of the nutter shouting "Geronimo" and pushing the cyclic at the sea) is beyond simplistic.
This thread was assumed to be closely linked to the PUMA Nigerian Ditching, maybe it is an unrelated issue to the ALERT INSPECTION fix described here in this thread (or is it!!!)
All accidents start with a root cause and probably some contributary factors. What I want is a quick interim report to suggest what may have caused the accident, ie no mechanical failure, or yes we the crew deliberatley ditched due to "X" happening in the final stages of the approach.
Whether you like it or not, there are two walking talking crewmembers in the Nigerian Incident who I suspect know the prime causal factor if not the underlying cause.
With a handle like SCOTSHELI, I guess you are employed on the NS, and if that is the case AND you fly the AS332 family you are you really happy to have to wait over a year for official reports to be released (as we are still waiting for the JSAR report).
I do not want to blame anyone, I simply do not want to have the same thing happen to me, even if it is a crew issue!!!!!
I can always count on a two-bit gob-sh**te to cry "Blame Blame" whenever anyone on these forums presses for answers. Or if not doing that, slagging off the press for doing their job!!
Its attitudes like yours that allow Commercial Operators, and/or Manufacturers to delay findings so long that the impact of the original issue, and therefore the need to properly fix the problem, are severely diluted.
I suggest you remove your head from the sand (if you are a NS jockey) and see the real issues here.
DB
