Frasca Bristow S92 Sim
Guest
Posts: n/a
Frasca Bristow S92 Sim
Hopefully a moderator can tidy this up a bit .
Google Image Result for http://www.frasca.com/body/S92extweb.gif
I think its impressive for Frasca to pull this off . Honestly thought they were out of their league .
HC how are the sims coming along?
Google Image Result for http://www.frasca.com/body/S92extweb.gif
I think its impressive for Frasca to pull this off . Honestly thought they were out of their league .
HC how are the sims coming along?
Ground Flight - I think they will be good. They are both complicated projects and perhaps more complex than Frasca first envisaged, but they are determined to give us a good product in the end. Bearing in mind the quality of the current level D sims, it will not be too hard to beat them in many areas. They are certainly better already in some areas (runway texture, weather radar returns for all coastlines, replication of N Sea platforms) but will always have some limitations compared to the Level Ds - eg projected display rather than collimated, less total travel on the motion. Overall they will be fantastic training assets to have in Aberdeen.
HC
HC
HC,
What kind of checkrides and training will be done in the new Frasca's?
Is it possible to do a full conversion course in the Sim along with the checkrides or must one continue to use the aircraft for part of the flying/checks?
What kind of checkrides and training will be done in the new Frasca's?
Is it possible to do a full conversion course in the Sim along with the checkrides or must one continue to use the aircraft for part of the flying/checks?
SAS - I am no expert in this area but I believe it depends on what it granted when the CAA do the approval. We are hoping to be able to do pretty much what we can do in Helisim / FSI, namely the complete conversion course in the sim followed by some Sim to Aircraft adaptation in the aircraft - maybe 2 hrs or so (4 for OGP?). For the recurrent training, we may be able to do it all or we might have to do something in the aircraft, for example the CAA might say that we have to do rejects or whatever in the aircraft once a year. But we are hoping they will allow us to do all the recurrent training in the Sim, as we can currently do in Helisim / FSI, since we hope that the Frasca sims will be as good or better in everthing except the designation.
HC
HC
It depends in how you interpret 'higher'! I think it will be a very good product. I'll be interested to see what you think of the Cuesim L2 when it arrives, HC. I gather they put the screens at 3m to reduce/negate the effects of head movements.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We're getting there...
Last edited by LastMinute; 23rd Feb 2010 at 23:18. Reason: Added bit about FS D
Lets see now, this thread is about the S92 sim so I am inclined to think that it will not compete against an EC sim. Or maybe you know something I don't about EC buying out Sikorsky?
HC
Oh alright then, I know what you meant! I think the Bristow EC225 sim will benefit from having been developed by a helicopter operator as opposed to a manufacturer. You have only to look at Helisim to see what the quality of a (Level D) sim can be when its developed by people who don't operate the aircraft. Whether other companies choose to come to us or to EC is of course for them to decide.
HC
Oh alright then, I know what you meant! I think the Bristow EC225 sim will benefit from having been developed by a helicopter operator as opposed to a manufacturer. You have only to look at Helisim to see what the quality of a (Level D) sim can be when its developed by people who don't operate the aircraft. Whether other companies choose to come to us or to EC is of course for them to decide.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Ridge
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The step from FS B to FS C is quite big as it requires more complicated modelling of aerodynamic and ground handling effects
Essentially, it's a device with FFSD aero/rotor/flight-controls/ground-reactions/engine/AFCS modeling.
As previously mentioned, the difference between the Bristow FFSB/FTD3 and a FFSD device is with regards to motion, sounds, and visuals.