Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

new radio rules and services

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

new radio rules and services

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th March 2009 | 21:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: SWANSEA
Angry new radio rules and services

what does the newly introduced (from march 12th) Rt rules and phraseology mean to the ppl, anybody know?
Metal man
metalman is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2009 | 22:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: In a control room with no radar...
ATSOCAS

Have a look around that site. If you request a FIS after 12th, you'll probably be offered a 'Basic Service'; RIS a 'Traffic Service'; RAS a 'Deconfliction Service'; and a 'Procedural' service for IFR outside controlled airspace where the unit does not have or is necessarily wishing to use any radar systems.
Scott Diamond is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 00:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: West Mids
Following a briefing we've just attended with a local ATC unit, it also means from an ATC point of view that the restrictions on having to keep aircraft 5 nm and 1000 ft don't necessarily apply in fact they are reduced to 3nm and if the other aircraft is in controlled airspace they have no requirement to tell you at all if you are not going to enter it.

In many cases now, if the blips on their radar will not converge or the aircraft they see will pass behind you, they may not tell you of its presence.

Therefore expect to see more aircraft passing closer than ever before.
TornadoWilkes is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 06:30
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Back

To

Debbie's

Place

= Basic, Traffic, Deconfliction, Procedural

If you need a mnemonic to remember the new services
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 11:25
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 314
Likes: 2
From: UK
what does the newly introduced (from march 12th) Rt rules and phraseology mean to the ppl, anybody know?
Metal man, Have you read CAP 774 yet?
roundwego is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 11:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: Bury St. Edmunds
Why the change?

What was wrong with the old system? It seemed pretty clear to both pilots and controllers and by the sound of things the "new" system won't give a better service to pilots. I like to know what's out there especially in IMC or marginal VMC. Even on a gin clear day given the blind spots of most ac cockpits getting a warning of what might be coming up your ar$e (especially if it is overtaking quickly) can be VERY beneficial.

Just my $0.02.

MB
Madbob is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 12:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: London
Did anybody else get the CD about the new services?

I think there is good info at www.airspacesafety.com, which are the people who did the CD

If not I'll see what I can do about sharing it, if its in the name of safety I don't think they will mind the copyright too much.... I hope
Helififtysix is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 13:35
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
why the change?
call me cynical but my guess is that it affords the controllers a greater degree of legal protection if the proverbial hits the fan.

Although why they couldn't keep the same names but change the definitions I don't know
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 13:53
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
The changes are intended to clarify what the user is entitled to under each type of service.

I wouldn't be surprised if these changes were lobbied for by controllers after legal action was taken against an RAF ATCO following a fatal USAF low flying accident (CFIT in the mountains). The ATCO was eventually cleared of blame but the case opened up some disparity about what a pilot could expect from a controller.

Shame they have had to confuse everyone for the sake of a few previously confused aircrew.....
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 13:55
  #10 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Angel

Crab, Speaking of Debbie, I find this one easier to remember:

Big T**s Do Please.

(In my dreams).
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 14:32
  #11 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 1
From: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Big Toes? Really ShyT?

To be serious for a moment, there are some informative threads on Private Flying and ATC issues, plus the safety website above.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 15:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Mrs Miggin's
Metalman,

The vast majority of the time you'll be asking for a Basic service, if the FISO your talking to has Radar then you could get a Traffic service, Deconfliction and Procedural are really for IFR.
Not crashing into the ground and other people is up to you.
Hope that helps, if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will correct me.
WylieCoyote is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 16:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: In a control room with no radar...
I think one of the problems with the FIS/RIS/RAS was pilots who would request a FIS, get a squawk, positively identified + miles from an airport; their altitude etc then controller would start saying traffic at 8 oclock etc; which led a few to believe they were under a RIS. (which is obvious despite controllers saying 'Flight Information Service'!)
Scott Diamond is offline  
Reply
Old 11th March 2009 | 18:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: UK
There is some discussion here:

http://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/359...s-changes.html

and here:

http://www.pprune.org/private-flying...2th-march.html

Cheers

P.
pumuckl is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.