Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Flight limits in falling snow

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Flight limits in falling snow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd February 2009 | 12:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 5
From: Europe
Flight limits in falling snow

With widespread snow the UK at the moment be interesting to know what limits apply to flight in falling snow in various helos, in terms of minutes flying permitted in a given vis. Any offers and views?
rotorspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 13:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Prohibited in B412 without snow deflectors installed.
TunaSandwich is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 13:36
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 365
Likes: 15
From: CYPG
the Jetbox requires Eng anti ice, Particle separator, snow baffles and automatic Re-ignition.

there should be 4 items anyhow.

Hovering limited to 15 minutes in falling snow.

Don't recall that there are any other limits.

The AS355F2 (FX2) was only a eng anti ice limit if I recall correctly

Cheers

edit: corrected the 4th element of the ice...

Last edited by Winnie; 2nd February 2009 at 15:21.
Winnie is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 13:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: 18 Degrees North
AW139 flight in falling or blowing snow allowed as long as not in icing conditions (vis <1000m + true air temp 0c or less)

CF
Camp Freddie is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 14:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: Yellow Brick Road
Not to mention possible white-out on landing ...
ReverseFlight is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 14:23
  #6 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
.....or Whiteout on takeoff and enroute.
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 14:44
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
BO 105 only with "continous ignition system" on.

skadi
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 15:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 5
From: Europe
It's a while ago now, but seem to recall that the AS350 had no limit on time over 1500m vis, 10 minutes 800-1500m and was not permitted less than 800m. FM I've seen for AS355 doesn't specify anything. A109? AS365? S76?
rotorspeed is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 16:38
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
A109 not approved for flight in icing conditions in basic configuration.

S-76 similar.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 19:06
  #10 (permalink)  
RotorHead
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 8
From: Canada
Is the L1,L2,225 puma fleet at abz approved for flight in icing conditions like today?

Just curious

Dave

Last edited by 206Fan; 2nd February 2009 at 19:25.
206Fan is online now  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 19:22
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 344
Likes: 105
From: Sweden
Falling snow is not icing condition in (at least) 99.9% ot the cases.
Falling snow and limitations in flight often refers to risk of flame out if lot of snow has formed on roof of heli or at engine inlets. This could make the engine flame out if a lot of 'clogged' snow comes loose and goes into the engine.

Bell jetranger: snow defelction plates should be mounted.
MBB bo105: min 800 meter visibility. Possible to mount continous ignition probably allows lower vis. (dont know the civilian POH to 100%, but flew a military version).
AS332 super puma: no restriction in snow visibility, but about how long time ground run as allowed without check on roof(max 20min in 400m or less)
AAKEE is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 20:00
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 40
From: On the big blue planet
Check this thread for S76:

http://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/271...-snow-ops.html
skadi is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 20:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 83
From: Gold Coast, Australia
I can't recall the 212 limits, but the early days of the Brent Field we found the particle separator worked pretty well in passing snow showers

FWIW, the external door hinges were/are the best ice accretion indicator on the 212. The wiper blade arm shows ice early, but is difficult to monitor compared to the door hinges.

John Eacott is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 21:56
  #14 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
What happened to all this Global Warming Al Gore has been bleating about?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd February 2009 | 22:04
  #15 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Perhaps we're paying enough extra taxes now, so it's no longer such a problem....
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2009 | 01:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Canada
As far as I know as per my POH the A-Star limitations (D,BA,B2, FX2 ammendment) as previously stated are correct although god/God knows why as sometimes the limited visibility is not always created by "falling snow" but also embedded fog.

That being said if you are running an FDC filter don't forget that once the light goes on in falling precip/snow you are GROUNDED! Just a little hint here... if your light goes on in flight pay attention to your T's and P's and you may not have to land "immediatly" and may be able to land at a spot that's a little more convenient. (Note:if you are questioning what I said just follow the book)

Don't forget to DI the workings of your bypass doors prior to each flight as well. If they don't work you are grounded and is not CLEARLY mentioned in the POH. Also, when landing for any length of time in falling snow when running the FDC filter, don't forget to put a cover on it....if you get a build-up of snow on it you can/will activate the low-flow light on start-up (Could also be indicated by T4) or just after lift-off. Don't mean to be a smart-ass but once you put the cover on don't forget to WALK AROUND YOUR A/C to make sure you took it off!!!

That being said does anyone know where the limited visibility flying in snow came to pass in the POH. Just curious as I fly in Northern Canada all the time, with and without FDC filters down to 1/2 mile and have never had an issue.

Any input from you boys over on the other side of the Pond would be greatly appreciated as here in Canada, no-one can get a straight "not covering my ass" answer from the "Makers"

Fly Safe ALL

Backward Blade
Backward Blade is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2009 | 05:34
  #17 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Our Sea King limits (we have a particle separator) depend on OAT and visibility; if the vis is above 2000m or the OAT below minus 6 degC then there is no limit.

The most restrictive limit is with vis less than 500m and the OAT above minus 6 degC when we have a 10 minute limit. This follows the idea that warm wet snow is the most hazardous due to accretion/blocking intakes etc.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2009 | 07:11
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 118
500

Falling snow is fine as long as auto relight is on and their is no centre seat pax. Not the same in an E model, presume this is because the switch for auto relight in an E is half way up the panel, not at the bottom in pre e machines, where center seat pax foot may turn it off. Unless anyone knows better ???
Hughes500 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2009 | 01:46
  #19 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 877
From: Canada
412 Snow deflectors???

Hi TunaSandwich:
Stupid question perhaps but why would a 412 require snow deflectors and a 212 not?

I have lots of time in a 212 in snow but all my 412 time is in the hot.

If the 412 requires deflectors could someone post a photo of them.
Just curious
albatross is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2009 | 10:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: USA
Never heard of a falling snow limit before. The 60 is basically retard proof. Just turn on the anti-ice when encountering "visible moisture" below 4* C and you're good. I guess an inlet that heats to above 93* C helps. The power loss sucks though.
busdriver02 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.