Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

IR(H) Exams

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

IR(H) Exams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Nov 2008, 13:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UKdom
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so if I sat the ATPL(H) exams in order to gain my CPL(H) within the 7 year validity period then am I going to get reissued with an ATPL(H)(VFR)?
misterbonkers is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2008, 18:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
In theory, but don't hold your breath - it has to go through Parliament yet.

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 08:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Directly from my inspector:

"Currently, CPL(H) + IR(H) theory is the equivalent in theoretical knowledge to an ATPL(H)"

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 10:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Phil,

Are you sure that your inspector is 'up to date' with Amendment 6 to JAR-FCL 2? I was led to believe when Amendment 6 came in, CPL + IR theory no longer equals ATPL theory.


(From personal experience, the 'interim' ATPL syllabus certainly covered many topics that aren't covered if you study the CPL and IR courses separately.)
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 12:45
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: out on a limb
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IR Exam Credits

I've just emailed PLD for an answer as I'm doing the IR exams at the moment. I'll post their response in full just as soon as I get and answer.

Oh course the answer I would like is "please accept exemptions to all the IR exams - love and kisses from all at PLD"

Fat chance!!!!
helipeek is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 14:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 52
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old national ATPL 13 exams passed in the past, just emailed them and got no exemptions at all.

If JAR CPL(H) can have an exemption for Human Performance then why not old CPL(H)/ ATPL(H).

When someone in EASA or the Authority put some sense into the system, hell will freeze over.
Dragpin is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 15:49
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this is what I received when I asked PLD

Dear Mr xxxx

As per my previous

I can confirm as per JAR-FCL 2.285 (amendment 3) the holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) satisfies the knowledge requirements for the issue of an ATPL(H).

The above is also noted in JAR–FCL 2.050 Crediting of flight time and theoretical knowledge (amendment 6)

(11) The holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) gained under previous amendments of JAR FCL 2 up to and including Amendment 3 is credited with the theoretical knowledge
requirements for ATPL(H) and IR(H).

I hope this resolves your query, however if you do have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely
xxxxx xxxxxxxxx





Hope that is of use guys.
helimutt is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 16:20
  #28 (permalink)  
RotorHead
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,054
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I can confirm as per JAR-FCL 2.285 (amendment 3) the holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) satisfies the knowledge requirements for the issue of an ATPL(H).
But only with 1000hrs+?
206Fan is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 16:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
NB

Originally Posted by helimutt
I can confirm as per JAR-FCL 2.285 (amendment 3) the holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) satisfies the knowledge requirements for the issue of an ATPL(H).
We are now on Amendment 6.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 16:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is there a problem with the understanding?



I can confirm as per JAR-FCL 2.285 (amendment 3) the holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) satisfies the knowledge requirements for the issue of an ATPL(H).
Yes, This satisfies the knowledge requirements!!
You'll still need to satisfy the other requirements before atpl issue. (ie night, Instrument, multi crew, requirements etc)


The holder of a CPL(H) and IR(H) gained under previous amendments of JAR FCL 2 up to and including Amendment 3 is credited with the theoretical knowledge requirements for ATPL(H) and IR(H).
If you gain the CPL(H) and IR(H) after Amendment 3 then you will need to do the ATPL exams again but probably get a reduction in requirements due to the fact you've already jumped through the hoops previously.
helimutt is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 16:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Sweat not, hm. I was just pointing out that detail for the benefit of the poster who first asked for the clarification. (ie choppertop).

IIRC, his exams have all been 'post amendment 3'.
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 17:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,659
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's a bloody minefield out there.
I wouldn't do them all again.

I believe you get the requirement for ground school time reduced to whatever the training provider thinks necessary, or something like that.

My last word on the matter. We've been here before I think.
helimutt is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 17:46
  #33 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When was Amendment 6 adopted by the CAA as it certainly appears from the website that they are still operating under Amendment 3? I suspect therein lies the confusion.

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 18:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Age: 72
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Therein lies the rub - they're not using 6 yet!

Phil
paco is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 19:51
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I can see the CAA are still using amendment 3 of JAR FCL 2 (See lasors) So CPL(H) + IR(H) still = ATPL(H) IR theory.

I think AIC 72/2007 has caused a lot of confusion and caused some of us to believe that ammendment 6 of JAR FCL 2 has been fully implicated by the CAA. However only the following parts have been introduced (See below, I've only copied the relevent parts) these are only the theoretial knowledge requirements if your changeing from A to H or visaversa.

AIC 72/2007
Bridging of Theoretical Knowledge before licence issue (JAR-FCL 2.050(b)(5).

JAR–FCL 2.050
Crediting of flight time and theoretical knowledge
(b) Crediting of theoretical knowledge
(2) In order to obtain a PPL(H), the
holder of a PPL(A), CPL(A) or ATPL(A) shall
fulfil the requirements specified in Appendix 1
to JAR-FCL 2.050.
(3) In order to obtain a CPL(H), the
holder of a CPL(A) or (ATPL(A) shall fulfil the
requirements specified in Appendix 2 to JARFCL
2.050.
(4) In order to obtain an ATPL(H), the
holder of an ATPL(A) shall fulfil the
requirements specified in Appendix 3 to JARFCL
2.050.

(5) The credits specified in paragraphs
(b)(2), (b)(3) and (b)(4) above shall also apply
to applicants having passed the theoretical
knowledge examination in all subjects required
for the issue of the relevant aeroplane pilot
licence, provided they meet the acceptance
period in accordance with JAR-FCL 1.495
ThomasTheTankEngine is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 21:28
  #36 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks TtTE, that's certainly how it looks to me!

Does anyone have any idea when Amendment 6 will be adopted in the UK i.e., is there enough time to sit and pass the IR(H) exams before the new rules are implemented?

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 21:36
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Antigua, West Indies
Age: 55
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phewww...

... just got to pass those little IR theory f*ckers now.

Thanks for the combined input, people.

And please don't put me on the naughty chair during consolidation week for doubting you, Paco. lol.

C-top
choppertop is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 22:23
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Whirls

As long as youve registerd with a ground school and started studying for the IR (Distance learing is ok) you can complete the course under ammendment 3 JAR FCL 2. There are time limits of course, you need to complete all the theory exams with in 18 months after passing the first exam and then gain the IR within 36 months after completing all the IR exams.

I would strongly advise getting it in writting from the CAA though. Plus if you done the CPL JAR exams you may get some credits as one of the other posters here did.
ThomasTheTankEngine is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2008, 23:17
  #39 (permalink)  

Hovering AND talking
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Propping up bars in the Lands of D H Lawrence and Bishop Bonner
Age: 59
Posts: 5,705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks TtTE; I haven't signed up (yet!!) but have passed the CPL exams. I was just interested whether signing up say, tomorrow, would still be valid. No doubt there are others in the same predicament!

Cheers

Whirls
Whirlygig is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 17:03
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: out on a limb
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HP&L

Just to let you know that I've got a dispensation from the authority from HP&L as I did the JAR ATPL(H) exmas a while ago. They quoted JAR FCL2.

Result!!
helipeek is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.