Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

No more night flights

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

No more night flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2008, 22:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
No more night flights

The hospital program we service has decided its to dangerous to fly at night, they do not want to expose the med crews to excess risk. So as of 1 Sept we no longer fly at night. As winter approaches the 12 hour day shifts will be trimmed back.

Central Montana Bell 407, NVGs, never did scene flights only inter-hospital.
We just completed NVG training with the med staff that week.

So any ideas to mitigate risk, the vendor was never consulted and told after the fact what the hospital decided. Not that anything will change their decision, just for my education making sure my thoughts seem in line with being safe.
havoc is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2008, 02:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not suggest a twin engine IFR operation. Operate as an airline type model. Use two pilots. Yes, the cost is higher but so is dispatch numbers! Yes it's anal but just a suggestion! No night scene calls just regulated certified heliports and airports.

DK
donut king is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2008, 12:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Hospital politics

DK thanks for the input, the program also has 2 KingAir 200s that they insist on 2 pilots. The Med crews feel safer in the 407 because they are up on the ICS and interact with the pilot.

We brought the idea up of a twin and 2 pilots....fell on deaf ears. The bean counter actually said if we fly less we save money.
havoc is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2008, 14:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No probs!

All we as line pilots can do is suggest and educate! Having flown EMS in Canada in my past, take a look at Ontario's and British Columbia"s air ambulance services. Both using S76's for now but heard rumours of AW139's. Again...cost issues, but I'm looking at it from a pilot's perspective.

The hospital politics is definitely a detriment at times unless they are progressively minded!

DK

P.S Good luck...fly safe!
donut king is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 15:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 46
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could also look into how well trained the ground units are in setting up a night time LZ. Wouldn't be the first time I've seen them set up a nice ring of flares in an open area... right under power lines!
Canuck Guy is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 15:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
It seems like yours is one of those "Billboard" type programs where the hospital really does not need the aircraft.
So how are the other two pilots being disposed of by Air Methods?
tottigol is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 15:54
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SW Asia
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No hospital needs a service that destroys 1% of its fleet each year due to Human Factors accidents. The EMS system must fix itself or perish.

And as to why the Hospital decided, unilaterally, that they would cut all night flights - why would they ask the flight department how to cure the problem, the flight department is the problem.
ramen noodles is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 16:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Montana is an awfully dark place once you leave the few cities and towns. NVG's would have been a real improvement but at the same time sets one up for a real exciting time if the goggles decide to go U/S way out in the middle of the mountains and other really dark areas on a Moon less night.

Havoc,

Perhaps looking a gift horse in the mouth is not the thing to do at this time. The Hospital made its decision for whatever reasons it chose. Suggesting they know not what they are doing will not endear you to AirMeth or the customer.

One thought is to do a study and see how many flights could have been done by a King Air or ground ambulance versus the 407 as it is all hospital to hospital anyway. Perhaps the night flying risk does exceed the necessity of using a helicopter for that mission.

Using the bean counter's logic....why not get out of the business altogether and save a real pot full of money?
SASless is online now  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 18:49
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
Thanks for the feedback

The pilots are currently working at bases that are short pilots. AMC said they will give them priority on positions they would like to bid on.

SASLess, 127 flights that the RW could not go on because the night team was out on a FW flight. Add on 34 for weather turn downs and 8 missed for maintenance and being out of service during checkrides/training. In a ideal world that would have put the RW over 500 flights in addition to the 450+ FW flights.

I always look for sound advice from you SASLess and you have not failed me this time....THANKS

AMC has asked to buy the FW and run the program as a community based service. Interest from the hospital is only peaked at times when unforeseen costs arise.

RN..the pilots (not just our program) have been proactive on issues flying in MT. I can understand the comment about why ask the flight dept when they are the problem. I still get a chuckle when thinking about the MD that called me after turning down a flight when the wx was 100 1/4 fog at KBIL. He was insistent that I could fly because he had just driven in from the out lying hospital with no problems. Its all perspective and making informed decisions.

I agree that the US EMS system is broke, IMHO.... AAMS, ASTNA, NEMSPA, CAMTS, IAFP need to merge and be one voice for the industry. If nothing else get all the membership $$ going to one place, makes for a great AMTC party.

AMC, PHI, AEL, Omni, etc...need to step up also.

CG...if the hospital ever does scene work training will be a major major priority. Rule of thumb for me and it did not fail me a few weeks ago working in Wisconson, All roads have wires and Fireman never look up.
havoc is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 00:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 770
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Maybe I'm just a little slow today (yeah, today) but Havoc, are you complaining? I'd be jumping for joy and thanking my lucky stars.
FH1100 Pilot is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 02:30
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
FH1100...not really complaining, separated business 101 from the personal issues already.

Just wondering what we had missed from a vendor to the customer side on managing risk.
havoc is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 03:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course...

...of course half the pilot staff will get the ax, right? And probably the hospital expects to have its fee to the vendor cut in half, am I right again?

This hospital is sending out a signal, are you receiving it? My opinion would be, this is a clear indication that they are in money trouble.
arismount is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2008, 02:19
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 515
Received 38 Likes on 16 Posts
As with any program the $$$ are always a concern, I can only guess that the hospital is doing ok based on their business model for growth (not the flight program).

When the hospital did ask for input on cost saving aspects of the FW program, the response was "we have always done it this way, why change"
havoc is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.