S-61N - In search of accurate blueprint/3-way views
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S-61N - In search of accurate blueprint/3-way views
For last 3 weeks I'm looking for accurate drawings of the Sikorsky S-61N, with little success, asking for them here is just one of last resorts - the other two are simply asking the Sikorsky and Carson
It's actually amazing. It's 40+ years old airframe, quite popular and apparently will fly forever... yet there are almost no accurate blueprints / 3-way view drawings around. I have few from the 1970s Airfix modelers magazine, and one kinda official looking and labeled "general arrangement" which have good general dimensions, but shapes are way off, plus few other from various places, but unusable for my work (3D graphics).
Do anyone have something sure and unquestionable about its accuracy ?
It's actually amazing. It's 40+ years old airframe, quite popular and apparently will fly forever... yet there are almost no accurate blueprints / 3-way view drawings around. I have few from the 1970s Airfix modelers magazine, and one kinda official looking and labeled "general arrangement" which have good general dimensions, but shapes are way off, plus few other from various places, but unusable for my work (3D graphics).
Do anyone have something sure and unquestionable about its accuracy ?
Hi Lt. Fubar,
ever tried http://www.the-blueprints.com/ ?
use the search function on the page - modern planes helicopters or so ;-)
or
http://www.the-blueprints.com/index....a-b/1731/view/
or
http://www.the-blueprints.com/index....n-z/5607/view/
if you need it accurate - verctorize the picture and you can play around with it as needed.
Greetings Flying Bull
ever tried http://www.the-blueprints.com/ ?
use the search function on the page - modern planes helicopters or so ;-)
or
http://www.the-blueprints.com/index....a-b/1731/view/
or
http://www.the-blueprints.com/index....n-z/5607/view/
if you need it accurate - verctorize the picture and you can play around with it as needed.
Greetings Flying Bull
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I tried, but those are Sea Kings, S-61N is different, longer fuselage, different floats, different vertical stabilizer, different main rotor head - just for start
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: northeast usa
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup I checked it... although, my needs are bigger than that
That type of isometric drawing usually have some issues with proportions, and what I truly need right now, are accurate 3-way view drawings
Don't bother searching Internet for it... I have them all already and I'm still not satisfied
That type of isometric drawing usually have some issues with proportions, and what I truly need right now, are accurate 3-way view drawings
Don't bother searching Internet for it... I have them all already and I'm still not satisfied
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Age: 53
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For last 3 weeks I'm looking for accurate drawings of the Sikorsky S-61N, with little success, asking for them here is just one of last resorts - the other two are simply asking the Sikorsky and Carson
It's actually amazing. It's 40+ years old airframe, quite popular and apparently will fly forever... yet there are almost no accurate blueprints / 3-way view drawings around. I have few from the 1970s Airfix modelers magazine, and one kinda official looking and labeled "general arrangement" which have good general dimensions, but shapes are way off, plus few other from various places, but unusable for my work (3D graphics).
Do anyone have something sure and unquestionable about its accuracy ?
It's actually amazing. It's 40+ years old airframe, quite popular and apparently will fly forever... yet there are almost no accurate blueprints / 3-way view drawings around. I have few from the 1970s Airfix modelers magazine, and one kinda official looking and labeled "general arrangement" which have good general dimensions, but shapes are way off, plus few other from various places, but unusable for my work (3D graphics).
Do anyone have something sure and unquestionable about its accuracy ?