Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Low Flying Twin Turbine

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Low Flying Twin Turbine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Mar 2008, 14:14
  #21 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,583
Received 441 Likes on 233 Posts
To what extent can the rules be waived for agreeable applicants/proposals.
How much can you afford? An ANO Rule 5.2 (c) exemption is a bit over £100 a pop these days, from those friendly folk at Belgrano Mansions (sounds of ringing tills in the background not heard since they began accepting credit cards). If you speak nicely, you can get an exemption valid for a whole year, a real bargain.

The only time I got one, I was really pleased with myself. Then the Met police put restricted airspace right in that area, which stopped me using it, even once.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 16:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
XX: I don't think any of us here work for CAA SRG. They are the ones who can answer your questions with authority (unless they say "get your own legal advice" which is the standard answer to any question which threatens their pension...)

Your state of mind worries me. "Very unlikely to crash" isn't an expression I've ever encountered with regard to permissions/exemptions. Are you sure you took Aviation Law in your PPL ?

You must read Rule 5 before you even attempt to ask for a CAA Exemption. So get CAP 393 in pdf form and search for rule 5. And do some searches for Exemptions.

You seem to have shifted your interest in landing sites from helicopter to Jodel FW. Different kettle of fish. FW treated differently in our only Class A space. Helicopters derive great benefit from NATS-issued Non Standard Flight permissions. Since a Cessna single overflew the West End towing a banner a few Christmases ago I believe the answer to FW singles asking for an NSF over a lot of London is no.
JimBall is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 17:04
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Inside CAS
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JimBall: With respect, you are over-analysing my phraseology. When I say "less likely to crash" I am of course referring to the fact single engine aircraft are not permitted over central london.
My original curiousity was to ascertain if private heli flights are permitted special exceptions in the heathrow zone, how this is arranged, and if there any practical differences between the exemptions process for helicopters and the process for fixed wing. Question answered anyway, thank-you.

I may well be rusty on certain aspects of air law, I did it 12 years ago! Thanks for pointing that out anyway.

Anyway, I'll sign out on this thread before it descends into an unnecessary but typical Pprune slanging match.
XX621 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 17:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
XX, without being a pedant
When I say "less likely to crash" I am of course referring to the fact single engine aircraft are not permitted over central london.
That isn't the truth. The rules state "glide clear" for FW over any congested area - so it's a pilot decision. You have 2400ft of altitude available - what is your glide ratio ?

And SEPs aren't permitted over Central London, how do you account for the Reds, the BBMF etc. ? Did you see the Red Bull air race in Docklands last year ?
JimBall is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 17:17
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Inside CAS
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I re-iterate;

"Anyway, I'll sign out on this thread before it descends into an unnecessary but typical Pprune slanging match."

Otherwise you just end up in "thats not exactly what I meant" / " but thats what you said " / "yes, but you were taking it too literally" type exchange from which I derive little enjoyment to be honest. Thanks for an interesting thread up to this point anyway. All the best.
XX621 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 17:46
  #26 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,583
Received 441 Likes on 233 Posts
And SEPs aren't permitted over Central London, how do you account for the Reds, the BBMF etc. ?
The Red Arrows....SEPs? What happened - more cutbacks?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 19:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And SEPs aren't permitted over Central London, how do you account for the Reds, the BBMF etc. ?
Military aircraft, not subject to civvie rules.

To what extent can the rules be waived for agreeable applicants/proposals.
AFAIK, the CAA SRG will agree ANY Exemption request where it's do-able for a good reason (and you pay the relevant fee of course). I think you could probably check your flock on a farm without an exemption as Rule 5 doesnt take into consideration animals, but Persons, vehicles, vessels and structures do count.
'Chuffer' Dandridge is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 20:52
  #28 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,583
Received 441 Likes on 233 Posts
Chuffer, you missed the point of my quote, I'm afraid.

Pedantry reared its head, so I couldn't help joining in the fun..... What does SEP mean?
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 21:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shy Torque,
He was probably saying in a nice way that the hawk is a SSSingle EEEngine PPPlane
Hover Bovver is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 21:11
  #30 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,583
Received 441 Likes on 233 Posts
Sorry, just pressed the wrong button while editing a spolling error..
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 22:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ...back of the drag curve
Age: 61
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, been a long day.
'Chuffer' Dandridge is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2008, 01:08
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rotornut,

CARS has an exemption for permissible low altitude flight for aerial photography by the holder of an air operator certificate...the media machine may be in the clear
somepitch is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2008, 12:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
somepitch,
I know. But they still have been well below the 1000' limit on many occasions and hovering at 500' over a built up area even in a AS355 isn't cool.
rotornut is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2008, 22:05
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FW treated differently in our only Class A space
other than Manchester TMA?
Bladecrack is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2008, 22:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,961
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Bladecrack
other than Manchester TMA?
Huh? MAN CTR SFC-3500' is [D]. LONDON CTR SFC-2500' is [A].
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2008, 01:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: US
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would you even want to be a helicopter pilot in the UK with such stupid restrictions?
Verbatim03 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2008, 07:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Verbatim03

we dont have the luxury of space you guys have over the pond so these restrictions are kind of needed.
4ftHover is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.