AS 350B2 - UnCFIT
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North of Eq
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AS 350B2 - UnCFIT
Well done Canadian Helicopters!
An incident report received today through the HAI states:
A Canadian Helicopters Ltd. AS 350 B-2, C-FQNS, was involved in heli-ski operations at Heather Mountain BC. On a fairly fast descent, in a turn, with low torque, the cyclic and collective locked up sending the aircraft into trees. Control was regained and the aircraft appeared to be okay. The group of skiers were dropped off and a subsequent flight attempted when a vertical vibration was noticed. The aircraft returned and was shut down. Inspection revealed damage to the main rotor blades, tail rotor and the right hand horizontal stabilizer consistent with a tree strike.
Thoughts and opinions? Where to start?
An incident report received today through the HAI states:
A Canadian Helicopters Ltd. AS 350 B-2, C-FQNS, was involved in heli-ski operations at Heather Mountain BC. On a fairly fast descent, in a turn, with low torque, the cyclic and collective locked up sending the aircraft into trees. Control was regained and the aircraft appeared to be okay. The group of skiers were dropped off and a subsequent flight attempted when a vertical vibration was noticed. The aircraft returned and was shut down. Inspection revealed damage to the main rotor blades, tail rotor and the right hand horizontal stabilizer consistent with a tree strike.
Thoughts and opinions? Where to start?
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Downwind
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where to start?
Name calling as usual!
We'll get people saying "Squirrels are s#*t", and others saying "Gee didn't it hang together well despite the abuse".
All I know is that this kind of thing is something that some will learn from and others won't. I prefer to learn, and this forum is great for that, but those that won't make it difficult at times.
Shame.
Name calling as usual!
We'll get people saying "Squirrels are s#*t", and others saying "Gee didn't it hang together well despite the abuse".
All I know is that this kind of thing is something that some will learn from and others won't. I prefer to learn, and this forum is great for that, but those that won't make it difficult at times.
Shame.
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jack Stall in FM
After I experienced one in a light B2 (but at 8000ft in a fairly steep level turn) I was unimpressed by the Flight Manual treatment of the issue. As I remember it it said something vague about reducing the severity of the manouvre and all would be well! Seems more serious of a problem than that.
The controls locked for about 3 seconds on me and I was high enough for it not to be a problem. Never had it since in 1200 hours of Squirrel time.
Just a thought, if you're only 3 or 4 seconds away from hitting the trees if the controls lock, you're probably in the wrong place to start with.
I love the B2 for filming work - terrific performance - but it would be nice if Eurocopter upped the hydraulic power and maybe put another rubber band on the drive.
The controls locked for about 3 seconds on me and I was high enough for it not to be a problem. Never had it since in 1200 hours of Squirrel time.
Just a thought, if you're only 3 or 4 seconds away from hitting the trees if the controls lock, you're probably in the wrong place to start with.
I love the B2 for filming work - terrific performance - but it would be nice if Eurocopter upped the hydraulic power and maybe put another rubber band on the drive.
Freewheel . so nice to hear that . So enlighten me ...what have you learned ??
Krobar. I dont think you will have experienced jack stall as it happens only when heavy and fast and high G. Eurocopter haters ( i hate the co but not the product !!) will bang on about it but i have thrown them around in a very heavy handed manner for years, often heavy and have never encountered it . I have also spoken to many other pilots with many more hours than me ....and none of them have either . I do not doubt that it can happen but i do doubt it can happen under normal flying , even wing overs etc
Personally if i thought i had just dinged a tree i would have a little look around before my next flight
Krobar. I dont think you will have experienced jack stall as it happens only when heavy and fast and high G. Eurocopter haters ( i hate the co but not the product !!) will bang on about it but i have thrown them around in a very heavy handed manner for years, often heavy and have never encountered it . I have also spoken to many other pilots with many more hours than me ....and none of them have either . I do not doubt that it can happen but i do doubt it can happen under normal flying , even wing overs etc
Personally if i thought i had just dinged a tree i would have a little look around before my next flight
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did it happen as you describe, i.e. did the aircraft actually contact the trees, ground etc. Even if it didn't contact Id want eng involved before further flight, due to the controls locking up.
No brainer as far as I'm concerned, land shut down & get eng involved
No brainer as far as I'm concerned, land shut down & get eng involved
Thomas, it is a "normal" thing for AS350s to do. Happened to me when travelling at speed and did a climbing right turn - controls went rock-hard until I released all pressure and the speed bled off from the nose-high attitude.
On another occasion, similar situation, it didn't lock up, but it flicked left to the level attitude.
On another occasion, similar situation, it didn't lock up, but it flicked left to the level attitude.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@NigelH Same , I don't know what these guys are doing to the squirrel. Meantime I have more then 7,000 hours on type and did all kinds of work with it but never had a so called "Jack Stall". Once I had a hydraulic failure (the belt went) during a dive towards a loch for picking up water for fire fighting. The squirrel is absolutely flyable without hydraulic. Cut the hydraulic with the switch on the pitch (not the test button) tighten the grip and follow the book
. Nothing unexpected will happen, no ditching, no hitting trees.
Always happy landings
Specer17
, I don't know what these guys are doing to the squirrel. Meantime I have more then 7,000 hours on type and did all kinds of work with it but never had a so called "Jack Stall". Once I had a hydraulic failure (the belt went) during a dive towards a loch for picking up water for fire fighting. The squirrel is absolutely flyable without hydraulic. Cut the hydraulic with the switch on the pitch (not the test button) tighten the grip and follow the book. Nothing unexpected will happen, no ditching, no hitting trees.Always happy landings
Specer17
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Downwind
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NigelH
Same as you. I just couldn't formulate the words at the time without sounding like I was bagging the pilot or the aircraft, which at this early stage seems a bit unfair.
The book is vague, but gives food for thought when read before you get into it.
If, as a number of posters have found, it happens to you, prior reading of the book, thinking about the situation and acting accordingly should put you in a position that it's not too much of a drama. That's not to say you won't get caught out, none of us here can say we haven't, but it stacks the odds in your favour.
I hadn't contemplated Spencer's solution for Jack Stall, I would have thought the accumulator would return pressure for a short period in such a situation, given that the pump itself would still be running at the time of the Jack Stall. It strikes me as similar to shutting down the good engine after a failure in a multi, but that's just my theory.
And yes, a supplimentary walk around is a very good idea. There's somebody on the North Sea that is probably very thankful a supplimentary walk around was conducted, but nobody's mentioned that on the thread yet.....
Same as you. I just couldn't formulate the words at the time without sounding like I was bagging the pilot or the aircraft, which at this early stage seems a bit unfair.
The book is vague, but gives food for thought when read before you get into it.
If, as a number of posters have found, it happens to you, prior reading of the book, thinking about the situation and acting accordingly should put you in a position that it's not too much of a drama. That's not to say you won't get caught out, none of us here can say we haven't, but it stacks the odds in your favour.
I hadn't contemplated Spencer's solution for Jack Stall, I would have thought the accumulator would return pressure for a short period in such a situation, given that the pump itself would still be running at the time of the Jack Stall. It strikes me as similar to shutting down the good engine after a failure in a multi, but that's just my theory.
And yes, a supplimentary walk around is a very good idea. There's somebody on the North Sea that is probably very thankful a supplimentary walk around was conducted, but nobody's mentioned that on the thread yet.....
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have talked to a couple of pilots who have had jack stall happen in the mountains, both in very benign phases of flight (cruise and cruise descent respectively). they were not performing aggressive maneuvers or in any way abusing/throwing around the a/c. they both experienced stiffening of controls which went away after a few seconds, and were at sufficient altitude that it did not endanger the flight. their best guesses were that there were mountain wind currents that momentarily loaded the disc in some way that overpowered the servos.
i think to insinuate that all pilots that experience jack stall are in some way flying like cowboys (though surely SOME are) is going a little bit far. one of the aforementioned pilots had over 13000 hrs, with multiple thousands in a-stars, before he experienced it.
i think to insinuate that all pilots that experience jack stall are in some way flying like cowboys (though surely SOME are) is going a little bit far. one of the aforementioned pilots had over 13000 hrs, with multiple thousands in a-stars, before he experienced it.
Wait a minute 
i dont think spencer meant he would cut hydraulics off during jack stall !!!! Firstly it is only transient ( 1-3 secs) and secondly the manual tells you clearly what to do ...that is unload the system by reducing collective. If you think of it , the system is already working at full tilt but not coping so how do you think it would help by getting rid of that help ? ie turning off the hyds....... At the moment you get the jack stall you will be heading towards a steep right angle of bank and going fast ...i have done that before with hyds off and i can tell you you need to be a weight lifter to cope and bring it back level. I now fully understand why in the book it says keep speed below say 80kn and do shallow turns Just like it says dont hovver without them .....it can be done ...i have done it (badly) but again the book is right. They obviously dont just write it for fun.
Anyway i say if you want to do a high g pull at weight fine but i would either do it on a left turn or be sure i havent got high obstacles on my right. Just an idea ...and if you do get it ....yr ham fisted and i pity your girlfriend
somepitch just seen yr message. I agree that in mountains with large updrafts it may be possible without mishandling, but i would be getting the engineers to check the pump is working properly. i have done a fair bit in mountains in canada heliskiing 7 up plus 6 skiis and back packs in 40knots ....very bumpy but never a sign of this jack stall.
i dont think spencer meant he would cut hydraulics off during jack stall !!!! Firstly it is only transient ( 1-3 secs) and secondly the manual tells you clearly what to do ...that is unload the system by reducing collective. If you think of it , the system is already working at full tilt but not coping so how do you think it would help by getting rid of that help ? ie turning off the hyds....... At the moment you get the jack stall you will be heading towards a steep right angle of bank and going fast ...i have done that before with hyds off and i can tell you you need to be a weight lifter to cope and bring it back level. I now fully understand why in the book it says keep speed below say 80kn and do shallow turns Just like it says dont hovver without them .....it can be done ...i have done it (badly) but again the book is right. They obviously dont just write it for fun.Anyway i say if you want to do a high g pull at weight fine but i would either do it on a left turn or be sure i havent got high obstacles on my right. Just an idea ...and if you do get it ....yr ham fisted and i pity your girlfriend
somepitch just seen yr message. I agree that in mountains with large updrafts it may be possible without mishandling, but i would be getting the engineers to check the pump is working properly. i have done a fair bit in mountains in canada heliskiing 7 up plus 6 skiis and back packs in 40knots ....very bumpy but never a sign of this jack stall.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Asia
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where does the buck stop?
This thread has an interesting focus. It was the machines fault!!
I wonder how many helicopter company managers are prepared to accept the argument that a control lock up, in conditions far away from those described in the flight manual for such an event, can be assigned to ‘jack stall’ and should not be the subject of further technical investigation; let alone that such an incident is an acceptable excuse for flying ‘through’ the trees.
To then attempt a further flight, unless the ‘local Taliban’ are after you, without stopping for a visual inspection and consultations with an engineer/mechanic simply beggars belief.
I only hope that we are not all muttering “there but for the grace of……!
I wonder how many helicopter company managers are prepared to accept the argument that a control lock up, in conditions far away from those described in the flight manual for such an event, can be assigned to ‘jack stall’ and should not be the subject of further technical investigation; let alone that such an incident is an acceptable excuse for flying ‘through’ the trees.
To then attempt a further flight, unless the ‘local Taliban’ are after you, without stopping for a visual inspection and consultations with an engineer/mechanic simply beggars belief.
I only hope that we are not all muttering “there but for the grace of……!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Scotland
Age: 72
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The servo accumulators should provide assistance for a few seconds, why not in the event of a "jack stall"?
I did not say that you guys experienced a "jack stall" fly like rodeo cowboys.
There are for sure do's and don't's for every aircraft and compared with others the squirrel (A-Star) is very forgiving.
I believe that it can happen but never experienced it myself .
Once a ran into real bad turbulence and probably high disc loads and rapid control movements overcharged the hydraulic system but control forces were only slightly higher then normal. Reducing torque and speed solved the problem. Maybe that was the beginning of a "jack stall", I don't know. But this happened on my worst flight ever. It scared the sh
out of me and I'm not easy to scare.
Spencer17
I did not say that you guys experienced a "jack stall" fly like rodeo cowboys
.There are for sure do's and don't's for every aircraft and compared with others the squirrel (A-Star) is very forgiving.
I believe that it can happen but never experienced it myself .
Once a ran into real bad turbulence and probably high disc loads and rapid control movements overcharged the hydraulic system but control forces were only slightly higher then normal. Reducing torque and speed solved the problem. Maybe that was the beginning of a "jack stall", I don't know. But this happened on my worst flight ever. It scared the sh
out of me and I'm not easy to scare.Spencer17
The accumulators only provide the same or less pressure than the normal hydraulic system, so they won't provide anything extra in the jack stall situation, which is when, as I understand it, flight loads exceed the capacity of the hydraulic jacks to oppose them.
If the aircraft had great big kick-arse hydraulic jacks and enough pressure to move them, jack stall wouldn't be a problem.
As it is, I've only felt it when trying to induce it on purpose for demonstrations - high speed, high power, pull reasonable g, feel feedback, reduce severity of manoeuvre and reduce collective, feedback goes away.
Depending on the condition of the particular hydraulic system and how the aircraft is being flown, plus gust loads perhaps, it seems it can happen in less severe flight regimes - close to the ground, not good as in this case.
The continuing flight after the tree strike thing doesn't sound that great, though.
If the aircraft had great big kick-arse hydraulic jacks and enough pressure to move them, jack stall wouldn't be a problem.
As it is, I've only felt it when trying to induce it on purpose for demonstrations - high speed, high power, pull reasonable g, feel feedback, reduce severity of manoeuvre and reduce collective, feedback goes away.
Depending on the condition of the particular hydraulic system and how the aircraft is being flown, plus gust loads perhaps, it seems it can happen in less severe flight regimes - close to the ground, not good as in this case.
The continuing flight after the tree strike thing doesn't sound that great, though.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chilliwack, BC Canada
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spencer17, you scare me. Ignoring the aircraft's limitations WILL NOT make them go away !
All others, especially Shortshaft, well posted.
I will not comment on the details of this incident.
Some of you have already read between the lines, and have a good idea what may have happened.
What I will say is simple. The HYD system is a known weakness of this aircraft, so never allow yourself in a position where you NEED to use it for control inputs.
Fly this type smoothly and professionally, and give yourself every available "Exit".
All others, especially Shortshaft, well posted.
I will not comment on the details of this incident.
Some of you have already read between the lines, and have a good idea what may have happened.
What I will say is simple. The HYD system is a known weakness of this aircraft, so never allow yourself in a position where you NEED to use it for control inputs.
Fly this type smoothly and professionally, and give yourself every available "Exit".
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Due to the contact with the trees, we got a report out of this incident.
How many others have had similar incidents and not reported them? Why didn't they report them? Did they write them up in the tech log? In the USA, send a NASA ASRS report, or use the HAI reporting system.
But for the sake of all the other AS350 drivers, report it!
How many others have had similar incidents and not reported them? Why didn't they report them? Did they write them up in the tech log? In the USA, send a NASA ASRS report, or use the HAI reporting system.
But for the sake of all the other AS350 drivers, report it!
Everyone calls the event "Jack Stall" but someone correct if I am wrong here....in "Jack Stall" one reduces collective to recover.....is this not the situation that occurred....the recovery action had already been taken well prior to onset of the controls locking.
Also...if the recovery action is to reduce collective....how does one do that if the controls are "locked" up?
Is it possible what happened here is the hydraulic pump cavitated due to the hydraulic fluid finding its way to the top of the tank and leaving the pickup open to air at the bottom of the tank? Thus, the real problem was a simple hydraulics failure that was cured by some positive "G" returning to the aircraft.
The Alouette III used to do that in severe turbulence in the mountains.....hit a very strong down draft and the controls would go stiff and pass a bit of feedback into the controls.....when the next up draft came along all was well again.
On a fairly fast descent, in a turn, with low torque, the cyclic and collective locked up
Is it possible what happened here is the hydraulic pump cavitated due to the hydraulic fluid finding its way to the top of the tank and leaving the pickup open to air at the bottom of the tank? Thus, the real problem was a simple hydraulics failure that was cured by some positive "G" returning to the aircraft.
The Alouette III used to do that in severe turbulence in the mountains.....hit a very strong down draft and the controls would go stiff and pass a bit of feedback into the controls.....when the next up draft came along all was well again.
As Sasless says, Jackstall does not 'lock up' the controls, the aerodynamic backloads (particularly on the retreating side with the highest AoA) overcome the power of the servo jacks and force them to the bottom of their travel.
The resulting pitch up and roll right is identical to retreating blade stall.
Recovery is to reduce the severity of the manoeuvre, either by reducing collective pitch, relaxing back pressure on the cyclic or both, depending on the flight regime. If the controls were locked up, recovery would be impossible. Turning off the hydraulics will not help, even a little bit.
If the controls 'lock up' you have a different problem or you have misinterpreted what is happening.
As for wazzing and zooming with skiers on board - don't push it to the limits and don't think that giving them a bit of a thrill entitles you to exceed what you would do with your wife and kids on board.
The resulting pitch up and roll right is identical to retreating blade stall.
Recovery is to reduce the severity of the manoeuvre, either by reducing collective pitch, relaxing back pressure on the cyclic or both, depending on the flight regime. If the controls were locked up, recovery would be impossible. Turning off the hydraulics will not help, even a little bit.
If the controls 'lock up' you have a different problem or you have misinterpreted what is happening.
As for wazzing and zooming with skiers on board - don't push it to the limits and don't think that giving them a bit of a thrill entitles you to exceed what you would do with your wife and kids on board.
Sasless
I like your theory but I don't think its correct in this case as the AS350 lets the pilot know of lost hyd pressure by flashing the warning light and activating the warning horn. Neither of these were present in the pilots report.
JJ
I like your theory but I don't think its correct in this case as the AS350 lets the pilot know of lost hyd pressure by flashing the warning light and activating the warning horn. Neither of these were present in the pilots report.
JJ