Robinson R66 (merged threads)
Looking at the picture, I don't see what the fuss is about. For sure it's cozy for 3, but no worse than 3 in the back of a car. Many years ago I was a frequent passenger in the back of a Jetranger (the DEC helicopter fleet if anyone here remembers that) and with three people it was VERY cozy... this doesn't look any worse.
The controls look exactly like an R44. I notice they haven't taken the opportunity to put an Ident button on the stick, even.
n5296s
The controls look exactly like an R44. I notice they haven't taken the opportunity to put an Ident button on the stick, even.
n5296s
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The controls look exactly like an R44
One thing that puzzles me... how come it has a mixture control knob? I suppose you COULD do the Fuel Condition this way but it seems unusual, to say the least. On the other hand I guess it really is a turbine since it doesn't have the mag test positions on the key.
As for the drive, if it ISN'T either belt or gears then it will be jolly interesting to find out what it is! Photonic drive? Electric transmission like on railway locomotives? Chains? Hydrostatic?
Actually there's a pic I saw somewhere which seems to show the engine angled upwards (from the rear), presumably it can just drive the gearbox directly, no need for a "clutch" (quotes because it's the most un-clutch-like clutch I've ever come across).
n5296s
As for the drive, if it ISN'T either belt or gears then it will be jolly interesting to find out what it is! Photonic drive? Electric transmission like on railway locomotives? Chains? Hydrostatic?
Actually there's a pic I saw somewhere which seems to show the engine angled upwards (from the rear), presumably it can just drive the gearbox directly, no need for a "clutch" (quotes because it's the most un-clutch-like clutch I've ever come across).
n5296s
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the drive, if it ISN'T either belt or gears then it will be jolly interesting to find out what it is! Photonic drive? Electric transmission like on railway locomotives? Chains? Hydrostatic?
presumably it can just drive the gearbox directly, no need for a "clutch"
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how come it has a mixture control knob?
And furthermore! Because of no tunnel and no "broom closet" and no engine pan intruding into the headroom, the center passenger in the R-66 has it pretty good...at least compared to a 206 or 500 that is...
The "mixture control" is most certainly the link to a mechanical fuel shutoff valve. Interesting carryover. Let's hope no one attempts to "lean this one out" to get the fuel burn down a little...
With the RR300 mounted on an angle like that, we can assume that Frank is using a driveshaft connection to the trans (wrong angle for a belt?). How and where he reduces the 6600 (or so) output shaft rpm will remain to be seen...as well as where he puts the freewheeling unit - on the engine like the 206 or on the trans.
Probably make an okay sightseeing ship - for short rides. In Japan. I wonder how much of a useful load it will have with floats and air-conditioning?
The "mixture control" is most certainly the link to a mechanical fuel shutoff valve. Interesting carryover. Let's hope no one attempts to "lean this one out" to get the fuel burn down a little...
With the RR300 mounted on an angle like that, we can assume that Frank is using a driveshaft connection to the trans (wrong angle for a belt?). How and where he reduces the 6600 (or so) output shaft rpm will remain to be seen...as well as where he puts the freewheeling unit - on the engine like the 206 or on the trans.
Probably make an okay sightseeing ship - for short rides. In Japan. I wonder how much of a useful load it will have with floats and air-conditioning?
Looking athe instrument panel and the the airspeed indicator goes all the way up to 170Knots but there was no red line on it to indicate any possible clues to speed.
If you put a red line on that indicator it becomes a law and you cannot go faster.
Nick would know more about that.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Africa
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Robinson R66
Howzit guys,
Anyone heard anything further on the new and upcoming Robinson R66. I read that it is slightly bigger than the R44 and is a turbine. Also is will be cheaper than the Jetty but more expensive than the R44. I think it's getting released in around November this year.
Any new information from anyone, some pictures would be nice.
Thanks
Anyone heard anything further on the new and upcoming Robinson R66. I read that it is slightly bigger than the R44 and is a turbine. Also is will be cheaper than the Jetty but more expensive than the R44. I think it's getting released in around November this year.
Any new information from anyone, some pictures would be nice.
Thanks
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Land of the Raj
Age: 69
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not just a picture, but a video of the first lift off.
YouTube - Robinson R66 N466R liftoff at factory
KW
YouTube - Robinson R66 N466R liftoff at factory
KW
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
CaptainKing - AIN ran this feature on the program last month, in which Frank R. tempers his expectations of the R66 ("fuel consumption is too…high and parts costs are too high"). The article also suggests deliveries are more likely to commence in 2010 rather than '09. Given the depth of the current recession (which may well stretch into 2011) it's not a great time to launch a new GA-targeted project, so later may be better.
I/C
I/C
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: An Irish dude in Houston, TX. I miss home!!!
Age: 43
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 480B is derived from the TH28 (a contender in the 90's for a new US Army training helicopter) and appears to be substantially more robust. It has a far superior safety record (never killed anyone) and fit and finish are excellent, IMO.
I'm no Robbie fanboy, but with the amount of them out there versus Enstroms it should go without saying that there are going to be more accidents in Robbies and therefor more fatalities. Just a thought.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EN48:
Certainly seems like you get more bang for the buck with the venerable Enstrom!
One thing I've always wondered, especially since the other posters have discussed seating in the R66 model: how flexible is the seating arrangement in your Enstrom?
That is, do you buy a certain configuration from the factory, and that is what you are stuck with outside of a major modification, or are the seats easily reconfigured depending upon the role?
I would imagine that one good thing with the R66 (and the Jetranger, etc.) is the relative mission flexibility...that is, you can train (slap in some duals), or carry 4 pax (if weight allows, etc.).
With the Enstrom, it seems that if you bought the "executive" seating version, you'd not be able to fly duals, etc. Right or wrong?
Enstrom Seating Chart
Certainly seems like you get more bang for the buck with the venerable Enstrom!
One thing I've always wondered, especially since the other posters have discussed seating in the R66 model: how flexible is the seating arrangement in your Enstrom?
That is, do you buy a certain configuration from the factory, and that is what you are stuck with outside of a major modification, or are the seats easily reconfigured depending upon the role?
I would imagine that one good thing with the R66 (and the Jetranger, etc.) is the relative mission flexibility...that is, you can train (slap in some duals), or carry 4 pax (if weight allows, etc.).
With the Enstrom, it seems that if you bought the "executive" seating version, you'd not be able to fly duals, etc. Right or wrong?
Enstrom Seating Chart
Matari ...you probably have the answer by now but all of those seating configs can be changed by the pilot by just moving seats , so yes you can have duals and 4 people . Great machine and best value on the market by a mile and v v cheap to run 10 /10