Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

UAV rescue helicopter

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

UAV rescue helicopter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th February 2007 | 15:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: uk
UAV rescue helicopter

If you climb Mount Everest and need to be rescued then read this before you go.
<http://www.gizmag.co.uk/go/6793/>

A very ambitious project.
Head Turner is offline  
Reply
Old 8th February 2007 | 01:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 491
Likes: 3
From: Iceland
[B]using ultra-modern composite technologies, a revolutionary diesel helicopter engine and rotor blades designed especially for maximum performance in thin air
Is it DeltaHawk or what??
rotorrookie is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 08:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: uk
If this is a realistic project and this UAV can operate at those altitudes, who is going to control it and from where. I cant see how this would work in a practical way.
Head Turner is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 10:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
From: Australia
There's people in OZ who cannot fly kites and reckon they could use them for mustering. We say to them bring them on, but nowhere near us.

This Everest project can't be too smart or else we would have heard from Dave Jackson by now. either that or he's off on holidays with his corkscrew.
topendtorque is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 10:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 1
From: USA
Makes Little Sense

The development of a new certified helicopter in the 6000 lb class (my guess based on the cartoon provided) costs perhaps $300Million. The market size for helos that can hover at 30,000 feet is perhaps 3. Makes it a pretty hefty price tag when you charge $100Million each.

Diesel is the worst engine for the mission, heaviest, and most affected by the thin air. If it is a twin, the losses are even worse. Turbines shine in that environment.

Also, the decision to build a man-rated UAV for this mission makes me wonder what the design team left off of the high-risk equation. A person/seat and such add 800 lbs to the design, leaving a pilot out for a mountain rescue mission seems risky. Since the loss rate for UAV's at this time is about 20% per year of operations, the safety for the passenger would be very questionable.
NickLappos is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 12:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
From: Cambridgeshire, UK
I'm a high boost turbodiesel fanatic (for cost reasons) but agree completely about choice of turbine for such an edge of envelope application, Nick.

On obscure projects: I thought the vaccum buoyancy project was interesting, albeit requiring >1m^3 per kg MAUW . Not convinced about the no fuel claim either, unless he is going nuclear to pump in/out the buoyancy tanks . I also wonder about the weight of the composite structure required to avoid tank collapse compared to that volume of hydrogen at say 500 mbar . Still, in theory it could hover and land - albeit much more subject to the whim of the wind than a helicopter. Ever seen a blimp do an airfield beat up?

Edit: $300M development seems a tad high, but i don't know heli project costs. I'm guessing S-92 was a $3Bn development project? What sort of concept development time goes on to kick off this sort of project?

Mart

Last edited by Graviman; 9th February 2007 at 21:50. Reason: The weekend unspool...
Graviman is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 19:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Port Townsend,WA. USA
Top,
I think Dave may have been banned from this forum for a while after a rather obcene post from Dave on another heated thread about the war.
slowrotor is offline  
Reply
Old 9th February 2007 | 19:11
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
topendtorque,
This Everest project can't be too smart or else we would have heard from Dave Jackson by now. either that or he's off on holidays with his corkscrew.
No holiday. Just been contemplating the perversity of a Don Knotts site that changes the linked picture in a PPRuNe posting from a humorous one to a very grotesque one.



Site owner;
The Army of Steve
315 West Hamilton Ave,
Apt B State College, PA
16801 US

Last edited by Dave_Jackson; 9th February 2007 at 20:00. Reason: For clarification
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.