aerodynamic question
Guest
Posts: n/a
aerodynamic question
During balanced level flight, the pitch angle of the main rotor blade:
a - remains constant on both sides
b - increases on the advancing side, decreases on the retreating side
c - varies according to the circumference disc, decreases in the front, increaes in the back
d - decreases on the advancing side, increases on the retreating side
Can anyone here explain the answer?
a - remains constant on both sides
b - increases on the advancing side, decreases on the retreating side
c - varies according to the circumference disc, decreases in the front, increaes in the back
d - decreases on the advancing side, increases on the retreating side
Can anyone here explain the answer?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Variable
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VTO
Afraid I dont agree. Pitch angle is changed by both the cyclic and collective. In a steady hover with no wind (A) would be correct. In level flight the pitch angle must change to avoid dissymetry of lift, reducing the pitch angle (and Angle of Attack) on the advancing blade and increasing on the retreating side, therefore answer (D).
I see others got in before me.
Afraid I dont agree. Pitch angle is changed by both the cyclic and collective. In a steady hover with no wind (A) would be correct. In level flight the pitch angle must change to avoid dissymetry of lift, reducing the pitch angle (and Angle of Attack) on the advancing blade and increasing on the retreating side, therefore answer (D).
I see others got in before me.
Guest
Posts: n/a
errr...pitch angle does not change to overcome disymmetry of lift. the blades flap and this changes the direction of the relative airflow, which changes the AOA, which solves the problem.
PITCH angle is the angle between the chord line and the plane of rotation. flapping does not change this.
PITCH angle is the angle between the chord line and the plane of rotation. flapping does not change this.
skadi
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Age: 60
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The pitch angle is changed by the cyclic and collective as already mentioned. In forward flight the pitch angle is different (more) on the retreating side and less on the advancing side, this is called cyclic feathering. The angle of attack changes through flapping as well. Flapping alone wouldn't be enough to solve dissymetry of lift.
But take a look at the swashplate and blade angles if you move the cyclic forward. (on the ground obviously, engine off)
But take a look at the swashplate and blade angles if you move the cyclic forward. (on the ground obviously, engine off)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hillerbee and skadi are quite almost right. We just have to adjust for gamma (rigging adjustment for "precession").
The "pitch angle" is the measure of what the controls do to the blade angle. It is geometric, and is measured by a protractor.
The helo, in balanced flight at forward speed, must have more AoA on the downwind blade than the upwind blade, due to dysymmetry of lift, since the downwind blade has less airspeed, it must have more AoA to create equal lift. This means the pilot has "balanced" the condition by applying cyclic to create this difference in AoA.
To confuse things further, the rigging must be about 90 degrees off (for "gyroscopic precession" let us call it), so the pilot places the cyclic to the right as he flys faster (US/UK convention) and this makes the geometric pitch of the blade increase in the forward section of the disk, and decrease in the aft (90 degrees before the desired blade motion).
Thus, the answer is "pitch angle Increases in the front, decreases in the back" which is an answer not given!
The "pitch angle" is the measure of what the controls do to the blade angle. It is geometric, and is measured by a protractor.
The helo, in balanced flight at forward speed, must have more AoA on the downwind blade than the upwind blade, due to dysymmetry of lift, since the downwind blade has less airspeed, it must have more AoA to create equal lift. This means the pilot has "balanced" the condition by applying cyclic to create this difference in AoA.
To confuse things further, the rigging must be about 90 degrees off (for "gyroscopic precession" let us call it), so the pilot places the cyclic to the right as he flys faster (US/UK convention) and this makes the geometric pitch of the blade increase in the forward section of the disk, and decrease in the aft (90 degrees before the desired blade motion).
Thus, the answer is "pitch angle Increases in the front, decreases in the back" which is an answer not given!
Guest
Posts: n/a
having flown in both systems, the JAA system isnt 'better' - it simply results in weeding out more people who cant afford the time/effort/money to study for the exams
i believe ex-mil people can automatically get a CPL if they have 500 hours on type, and an ATPL if they have a certain number of "command" hours. i dont really know the details. i also believe if they have a certain number of hours there is a "military bridging" groundschool option which is fewer than 14 exams
but yes, the LPC is a rip off.
i believe ex-mil people can automatically get a CPL if they have 500 hours on type, and an ATPL if they have a certain number of "command" hours. i dont really know the details. i also believe if they have a certain number of hours there is a "military bridging" groundschool option which is fewer than 14 exams
but yes, the LPC is a rip off.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Age: 60
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question could have been an FAA question as well. Aerodynamics are the same everywhere. I have done both systems and I don't see a lot of difference (aerodynamics), maybe because I just want to know what's behind it and don't just study to get the exam.
In general JAA is more compicated, but why do we have to talk about that all the time? We are not going to change anything about it.
In general JAA is more compicated, but why do we have to talk about that all the time? We are not going to change anything about it.
The answer is D. The advancing blade would generate more lift due to 1/2 Ro V squared lift formula if the pitch was not reduced and vis-versa for the retreating blade.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After reading about these tests you guys have to take
After reading about these tests you guys have to take, I'm happier than ever to be a Yank. Really, seriously, what does it matter about the angle of the dangle? I'm not a mechanic or an engineer. I pull up, it goes up, I push forward, it goes forward. I do that a few times and I get paid. End of story. Anyway, best of luck on passing these tests but if I were you guys and had to do that I'd just put in a little extra tuition and become an engineer instead of a pilot. You'd probably live longer, make more dough, and be happier. Cheers from Yank land.
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAA test question
The question could have been an FAA question as well. Aerodynamics are the same everywhere. I have done both systems and I don't see a lot of difference (aerodynamics), maybe because I just want to know what's behind it and don't just study to get the exam.
In general JAA is more compicated, but why do we have to talk about that all the time? We are not going to change anything about it.
In general JAA is more compicated, but why do we have to talk about that all the time? We are not going to change anything about it.
During forward cruising flight at constant airspeed and altitude, the individual rotor blades, when compared to each other, are operating at:
a) unequal airspeed, equal angles of attack, and unequal lift moment
b) unequal airspeed, unequal angles of attack, and equal lift moment
c) constant airspeeds, unequal angles of attack, and unequal lift moment
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: no fixed abode
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
91205
Hope you're still following this!! I had a better explanation to your answer, but then my computer crashed. So, I'll just put in my ten cents and say the answer is (D). It is known as flapping to equality, but the term is mis-leading as the blades do not actually flap, they "move down" on the advancing side through a reduction in pitch angle, and "move up" on retreating side through an increase. This serves to restore changes in angle of attack due to an airflow over the disc during level flight.
Hope you're still following this!! I had a better explanation to your answer, but then my computer crashed. So, I'll just put in my ten cents and say the answer is (D). It is known as flapping to equality, but the term is mis-leading as the blades do not actually flap, they "move down" on the advancing side through a reduction in pitch angle, and "move up" on retreating side through an increase. This serves to restore changes in angle of attack due to an airflow over the disc during level flight.
Lift left hand----trees and cars get smaller
lower left hand----trees and cars get bigger
How easy is that?