Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter down - North Sea Dutch sector

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter down - North Sea Dutch sector

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 13:46
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is helicomparitor when we need him?

Very interesting! This is a BRISTOW Super Puma that ditched with a load of pax, perhaps allowing them to use the large, handy escape windows. Pity that helicomparitor did not help us understand this one, unlike his extremely helpful discussions when other brand helicopters have cockpit lights come on, and he wonders out loud if that should affect their engine failure probabilities.

What say you, hc, should this engine problem, followed by flight control problem be counted in some way?

Seriously, it is good that all made it out ok.
NickLappos is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 14:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: No Fixed Abode
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
J-sar

According to decent info, they had ng problems in one engine @ 3k, descended to low level, had ng probs on the other engine, then intermittent hydraulic locking on the controls, they ditched and thankfully all made it out... nicely done.
Blue Rotor Ronin is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 15:26
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at the photo taken from the front right of the heli, it looks like the windows are still there and the main door has been slid forward though the captain's door is open. The chaps would have only gone through the windows if the heli had capsized. looks to me that they should have been able to walk into the rafts, I don't know how the evacuation went though and if this was the case...
simfly is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 16:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 1,079
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Blue Rotor Ronin
According to decent info, they had ng problems in one engine @ 3k, descended to low level, had ng probs on the other engine, then intermittent hydraulic locking on the controls, they ditched and thankfully all made it out... nicely done.
That's really BAD LUCK!
Aser is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 16:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pistongone

That would be telling

The S76C does indeed have floats as do all helicopters that are used in the offshore industry.

If you are going to the Rough 3B you will be travelling in a 365N2 and it should only take 15mins.

HF
Hummingfrog is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 16:59
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: london uk
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hummingfrog,
Its 47Bravo we are off to. We have just got it back online, and its close out time and home for Christmas. Rough has two main platforms Alpha and Bravo funnily enough and the Bravo platform blew up back in February. We have just re-commisioned it and are in the process of handing over the asset, to use management Bull$Ł!T. So maybe see you there!
pistongone is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 17:36
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 67
Posts: 2,090
Received 39 Likes on 21 Posts
Nick

I am sure my colleagues who spent some time in the water at midnight will be warmed and comforted by your gloating. You really aren't a very nice person are you.

And no, this was not a 225 so only normal sized windows (bigger than the S92's none the less)

From the scant info so far, it seems that the engine problem was not why they ditched - both engines were producing useful power and governing rrpm. It was the control malfunction. It is not nice to be flying along and unable to move the cyclic, even if only intermittently.

I presume these are linked but just how is not known at this stage, and I see no point in speculating. The AAIB will come up with the answers in due course.

HC

Last edited by HeliComparator; 22nd Nov 2006 at 17:47.
HeliComparator is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 18:50
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 287
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Got to say I’m somewhat disappointed with your comments Mr Lappos, don’t believe this is the right thread to take pot-shots at HC or the Super Puma.
Have been following the other thread and there imho you also show signs of a being a bad loser (not sure there are any “losers” but that’s the way some of your replies come over to me).
Had thought a man of your calibre, experience would be above that kind of things.
For now and back to the thread I will be very interested to find out what really happened and the causes, but think we will have to wait for the AAIB for that.

Greetings

Finalchecksplease
finalchecksplease is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 19:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fcp Spot on.

Many of us Mr Lappos do not feel this is an occassion to shoot cheap shots at our competitors, and immediately offered what help we could. It is beyond me why someone is so keen to rubbish their former employers competitors products. Perhaps Dassault & Bombardier should be better targets for a bizjet man...

Well done to the crew. A job well done in a difficult situation by all accounts.

A minor correction: As the accident occured in waters of The Netherlands, the accident will be investigated by what is known as the De Onderzoeksraad voor veiligheid (the Dutch Safety Board) since the old RVTV's role was expanded in 2005.

The last helicopter accident in our sector was 9 years ago:
http://www.safetyboard.nl/publicatio.../981022271.pdf
This report, perhaps not as read wide as it should, helped justify the SAR aircraft at Den Helder. You will see the benefit of escape features and recommendations for more work in this area. This report shows there are many reasons to use an escape window not just after a mechanical failure.

And, I hardly dare mention it, you may also note a recommendation for AVAD.

When the Safety Board report is published the wise men will learn from it just as the wise men learnt from PH-KHB.

Nor do wise men only want to improve safety when they or their friends have something to sell.

Lets hope JSAR is back in the air soon.

Last edited by sox6; 22nd Nov 2006 at 19:43. Reason: Because offshore and SAR crews are worth it...
sox6 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 19:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my house
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Second "accident" to a 332L2 in two weeks. Likely unrelated but not a good time for EC.

Helicomparitor, wouldn't HUMS pick up problems before a possible engine problem became significant enough to cause control issues? Isn't that what its meant to do, detect problems early to prevent this kind of thing? Is the system on the 225 more advanced than the L2?

HH
Hippolite is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 20:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If someone doesn't want to speculate (much!) on the cause, is it a bit optimistic to ask them to speculate on the solution on the same day as the accident?
sox6 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 20:11
  #32 (permalink)  
419
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: London
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wouldn't HUMS pick up problems before a possible engine problem became significant enough to cause control issues?
Yes, but only if it was a fault that had started to develop before the last IHUMS download.
I don't know how long this particular aircraft had been flying, but if it was on the return sector, it may have been 2-3 hours, during which time a sudden engine fault may have occured, so IHUMS wouldn't have helped.
419 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 20:17
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harwich
Age: 65
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chaps, I feel that Mr Lappos is not satirizing (his spelling!) the machine so much satirizing as the commentators. A bit like Private Eye in the UK.
Hilico is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 20:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you try make nobel something that is not!

sat·i·rize tr.v. sat·i·rized, sat·i·riz·ing, sat·i·riz·es
To ridicule or attack by means of satire.
sat‧ire/–noun 1.the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.

Using an accident to do that is in bad taste and 'deriding the folly' of being able to escape through large windows (or looking at the photos - doors) is ill judged IMHO.

Plus people pay for Private Eye because it is funny.
sox6 is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 21:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 67
Posts: 2,090
Received 39 Likes on 21 Posts
HH

I think it would be a mistake to assume that the problem stemmed from an engine problem. The only engine problem was a mismatch in power settings. Personally I think we may find that the root cause of the accident caused both the engine problem and the control problem. There are some possible scenarios but I am not going to speculate at this stage.

HUMS on the 225 is called M'ARMS and yes its a later design than the EuroARMS on the L2.

sox - when I said the AAIB I did of course mean the Dutch version but not knowing what they were called, AAIB was as close as I could get! Sorry about that!

HC
HeliComparator is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2006, 23:07
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tax-land.
Posts: 909
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Glad everyone made it out OK.
Very glad, as a ditching at night (even though a controlled one)presents itself with many additional difficulties.
Even happier 'cause one of my buddies flies 332s out of Den Helder.
tottigol is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2006, 00:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by check
This was not a crash, every time an aircraft lands "out of sequence" it has to be a crash. Why?
This was a controlled ditching following engine "problems" followed by flight control "problems". The helicopter is on the beach (yes beach) so no doubt these problems will, we hope will be found and sorted so all the other L2 drivers can sleep well at night again.
As well as being the SAR helicopter it also does the night standby cover for the oil patch. Which was the reason for last night's flight.
As reported previously, all are well.
ok it was a controlled ditch. but check the time of the post, it was almost realtime. it was not clear what happend yet, only everbody was safe. and it floated to the coast, not landed there.
chinook<NL> is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2006, 00:47
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northern Scotland
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glad everyone made it out safe, Have to say well done to the crew, cannot have been easy ditching at night with a control restriction.

I flew out of Den Helder today on the other Tiger, G-TIGJ.

On check in at Den Helder we were offered a brief on the incident if we so wished, I went just because I am a Radio Operator and wondered if there was anything that would be useful if I ever received such a call, plus I used to work in the ARCC while in light blue and wondered about the SAR response. Nothing new to add to what has already been posted but I did notice that during our video brief you could have heard a pin drop, I dont think anyone even moved. As someone who has had to stop video briefs before on other rigs due to the guys going back to the beach just chatting while it was running it was a noticeable change. Makes me wonder why it isnt always like that.

Again, just glad that all are safe.
Norman Nimrod is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2006, 06:26
  #39 (permalink)  

Just Dropped In
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: um....er.....
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glad to hear everyone made it out ok!

Nice flying!

Also glad to see a machine sat upright in the water! Reassuring to see the flot bags work!



Ashamed to see people using a thread like this to have a pop at anything or anyone!

Congrats to the crew!
Roofus is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2006, 09:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Starboard door EC332

Everyone please note that the starboard doors on Eurocopter 332 aircraft are liable to jam when jettisoned if a winch frame is attached. This has been highlighted to Bristow crews. Probably why the Starboard Door was slid open and locked for the evacuation.(The door can drop down on the lower projecting winch frame and rotate such that it traps against the sponson making egress difficult) .
mike666 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.