Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

S-76D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th June 2012 | 21:07
  #81 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: North America
Its not really relevant because it has largely missed the marketplace
industry insider...please eleborate. What marketplace? What was the window of opportunity that has now closed?
HeliTester is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2012 | 14:41
  #82 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 727
Likes: 47
From: Earth
These are Sikorsky's own numbers

SansAnhedral is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2012 | 19:29
  #83 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: North America
SansAnhedral…those C++ vs D numbers are confounding. At the bottom of the tabulation Sikorsky is listed as the source, but what could be the reason for producing such a table?
HeliTester is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2012 | 20:23
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
The table is from an article about the S‑76D in Flight International.
LastMinute is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2012 | 20:35
  #85 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 376
Likes: 4
From: Durham, NC USA
Upgraded S-76

I don’t believe that Sikorsky marketing would intentionally publish this chart. These numbers would make it difficult for an operator to justify the increased cost for the newer D. However, the numbers appear to be correct when comparing the information provided in Sikorsky’s marketing brochures for each model. Hover and OEI service ceilings appear to be the only significant performance advantages of the D over the C++. Other improvements are kind of icing on the cake, most of which are standard on the competitor’s newer machines. After all it is still just an upgraded S-76.
Jack Carson is offline  
Reply
Old 7th June 2012 | 20:38
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: retirementland
Just goes to show what a waste the 76Dog is. And not OGP compliant either.
Shell Management is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 01:28
  #87 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
I bet they still sell a couple of hundred SM Flight Safety are plumbing in the D sim shortly. I am looking forward to flying her! Will not be too long now.
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 13:43
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: retirementland
They would have sold more if they had not had the massive failure to achieve certification to schedule. Perhaps the FAA have been tougher on Sikorsky than before.

Having said that they started the D development 10 years too late and the performance is almost perceptibly different from the C++.

Against newer products from EC and AW this will just be a cash drain on a company that otherwise has no civil offerings between the S333 (no exactly selling like hot cakes) and the S92.

The D is one good reason for the removal of Geoff Pino.
Shell Management is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 14:08
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, USA
What's taking so long in certification? From what I can tell, it's the same airframe, same basic components, same everything except new rotor and new engines?
AdamFrisch is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 15:08
  #90 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
Yes you're right SM and I don't disagree with any of your words - but the D will be with us soon and customers, mechanics and pilots will be able to share once again in Sikorsky's brilliant engineering. That's another statement up for debate of course, but I'm sure the D will let the ultimately successful 76 sail off happily into the sunset.
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 20:10
  #91 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: North America
Sir Korsky,

Last month on the “working for the big dogs” thread regarding another poster’s possible employment at Sikorsky you wrote…
I would avoid any UTC company like the plague.
Today you write…
I bet they still sell a couple of hundred SM Flight Safety are plumbing in the D sim shortly. I am looking forward to flying her! Will not be too long now.
and
the D will be with us soon and customers, mechanics and pilots will be able to share once again in Sikorsky's brilliant engineering.
Seems like you’ve had a change of heart!
HeliTester is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2012 | 20:20
  #92 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
Look, it's coming so enjoy it. That's the conclusion I have come to. Lucky for you that you have a lot of time on your hands.
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2012 | 05:55
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 3
From: Milano, Italia
Shell Management wrote: The D is one good reason for the removal of Geoff Pino.
Seems a little harsh on poor old Geoff. Either way ..

United Technologies Corp has announced the appointment of Mick Maurer as President of its Sikorsky Aircraft from 1 July 2012. Maurer will report to UTC chairman and chief executive Louis Chênevert, succeeding Jeffrey P. Pino, who will retire 1 July 2012. To ensure a seamless succession, Pino and Maurer will collaborate closely during the next two months, after which Pino will serve as a consultant to Sikorsky.
UTC names Mike Maurer as president of Sikorsky - Corporate Jet Investor
Savoia is offline  
Reply
Old 10th June 2012 | 02:18
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Ski,

Is GFC another name for the Canadian anti sub S-92 which are years late and they can not fly at night or over water. How many years before they will be allowed to risk a ship by trying to land on it?

TC
Tcabot113 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th October 2012 | 23:22
  #95 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 77
From: USA
Any truth to the rumor that the D got certified on Friday just gone?
Sir Korsky is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2012 | 07:06
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Confirmed.

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2012 | 07:32
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 44
From: Europe
Hello Sir Korsky,

Sorry about my english but I don't understand : "the D got certified on Friday just gone".

The D has been certified or his certification has been delayed ?
.
HeliHenri is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2012 | 07:40
  #98 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 16
From: Waltham Abbey, Essex, UK
HeliHenri

The message says that the S-76D is now certified........ looks like Friday 12 October......
PANews is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2012 | 08:01
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 44
From: Europe
Thank's PANews for the "translation"

It's an important (and long awaited) news and there's nothing on the Sikorsy website or in the professional media.
.

Last edited by HeliHenri; 15th October 2012 at 08:03.
HeliHenri is offline  
Reply
Old 15th October 2012 | 08:08
  #100 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Cornwall
S76D

It's one thing turning up to the party late but when you turn up with the wrong product it's sad for those that always thought Sikorsky were a dynamic and forward thinking innovator.

G.
Geoffersincornwall is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.