Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Long Distance Offshore Ops

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Long Distance Offshore Ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th September 2006 | 14:23
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
From: Cornwall
long range ops

The clients are located somewhere other than S. America but I'm just doing some background research courtesy of all the well-informed guys and gals out there. I haven't come across any surprises yet but some blanks have been filled in to help me get the whole picture - for which I'm grateful. Any more thoughts/comments/experiences are always welcome.

Geoffers

Geoffersincornwall is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2006 | 19:10
  #22 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
I'm sure the BHL Australia 332 boys are doing a leg in excess of 300 nm using PNR, and have been for some time.
212man is online now  
Reply
Old 28th September 2006 | 20:00
  #23 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 496
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk
I believe they were doing so in the S-61 in the early 1980s..
Droopy is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2006 | 23:46
  #24 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
212man,

How does that square with JAR requirements....under what conditions can one plan to make an emergency landing on the rigs (ie tail rotor problems) or OEI for an S-61?
SASless is offline  
Reply
Old 28th September 2006 | 23:50
  #25 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
SAS,
I think you'll find CASA is not JAR: call me old fashioned, but something to do with 8000 miles and all that. BHLA is not BHL as their pilots will frequently remind you (something to do with working 2 on 2 off and having 4 weeks leave PA, but still earning enough to have a ranch etc)
212man is online now  
Reply
Old 28th September 2006 | 23:54
  #26 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
SAS,
under a more serious note, you can nominate an offshore alternate if there is no land alternate. i.e. you cannot nominate an offshore alternate to increase payload if you could have used an land based alternate.
212man is online now  
Reply
Old 29th September 2006 | 00:28
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 696
Likes: 10
From: Shropshire
Hi Sas

From memory, offshore diversions in the UK were allowed for aircraft that could demonstrate single engine cat A (as was) helipad approaches. Bo 105 and AS 365C are two types that spring to mind, the S61 never came into this group. I'm not sure I would have wanted to take a tail rotor problem all the way back to shore in any case! A 105 single engine approach wouldn't have been an awfull lot of fun either!!!!

Cheers

TeeS
TeeS is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2006 | 08:11
  #28 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 176
Likes: 2
From: Aberdeen
I'm not sure I would have wanted to take a tail rotor problem all the way back to shore in any case!
If it was a tailrotor control malfunction (i.e. stuck pedals) then returning to an airfield for a run on landing might be your only option. A safe offshore landing with this malfunction would be near impossible.
Woolf is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2006 | 08:15
  #29 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 696
Likes: 10
From: Shropshire
Good point. Although the onshore alternate did not need to be an airfield, it usually was.

TeeS
TeeS is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2006 | 13:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Offshore US the only requirement is an alternate landing site, which can be another platform, and this is just in case the destination deck becomes unusable for some reason. Some operators require a beach alternate for some aircraft, but the FAA doesn't really care. There are no legal requirements for an onshore alternate for any aircraft. The FAA's only requirement is fuel for destination plus 20 minutes.
GLSNightPilot is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2006 | 19:15
  #31 (permalink)  
Odi
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Ice Station Zebra
The longest single trip from Aberdeen is PD - Magnus. From memory (measured on many boring night shifts) is about 280nm.
I recall one weekend round trip being:

PD - Magnus
Magnus - Fulmar
Fulmar - somewhere else
somewhere else - PD

Mind you, the routing of a Bond Mk2 a couple of afternoons ago was involved:
PD - GA4 (nr Claire)
Claire - PM
PM - PB
PB - Schiehallion
Schiehallion - PD

We have a standing joke in the tower that anyone doing such an arduous routing (and we see some really convulted routings at weekends) has been caught doing unmentionable things to the chief pilot's daughter (apologies if he really does have a daughter!).

Odi
Odi is offline  
Reply
Old 1st October 2006 | 21:12
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Northern Ireland
North Sea

Yes we do get some long old trips on the weekends.
Do tend to be round robins.
We always use Onshore Alternates.
For the Magnus(284nm), North Alwyn(246nm) we used the (ERA) Enroute Alternate which allowed you to discount the extra 10% of fuel required up to an abeam point of Sumburgh which was 165nm from Aberdeen.
The Magnus/North Alwyn nearly always went through Longside/Sumburgh or the MCP rig because of the distance and Old Super Puma Mk1 aircraft.
The Norweigans did previously use an Onshore alternate until they were on station and then used Offshore diversions until going back onshore. Do not know if this still happens.
As was stated earlier there is no point in having an Offshore alternate as you do not know what sort of emergency you are liable to have, i.e. tail rotor control problems.
jbrereton is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd October 2006 | 10:09
  #33 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 65
Likes: 2
From: Spain
I recall that Bristows, when the AS332 first came into service, were able to use offshore alternates. Later on, in the late 90's, only 332's flying for one particular client, in one particular field, (the Beryl, I think??), could use them, and that was only under specific circumstances. Memory is fading with advancing years, so no doubt someone out there will correct my misconceptions.
We also used to use offshore alternates for the Bell 212 in the early 80's.
The S61 was never allowed to use offshore alternates, well, not while I flew it, 89 - present.
Attila is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd October 2006 | 18:11
  #34 (permalink)  
Odi
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Ice Station Zebra
Out of interest, how do you define "abeam Sumburgh" on a trip from PD to, say, North Alwyn?
Do you take it as the point at which you are nearest to PB before you then start to move away again, ie roughly south east abeam?
Odi
Odi is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2006 | 11:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Over the Hill and far away
Oz S61

Interesting thread. Around the time John Eacott was referring to with the Wx-60, the Queen of the Skies (S61) was flying similar legs with offshore alternates. The alternates were not rigs but areas of sheltered waters (reefs) and the crews were at the time required to demonstrate single engine water landings as part of the training. Never required operationally.
P2bleed is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2006 | 11:34
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 83
From: Gold Coast, Australia
Originally Posted by P2bleed
The alternates were not rigs but areas of sheltered waters (reefs) and the crews were at the time required to demonstrate single engine water landings as part of the training.


And didn't we use to file "AOS" as an alternate with Flight Service: Any Open Space/Surface


John Eacott is offline  
Reply
Old 4th October 2006 | 12:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: In the Haven of Peace
TeeS
You didn't have to have Cat A helipad. Back in the late 70s, early 80's in Bristow we used to have to be qualified for SEDLs (single engine deck landings). When the offshore-based 212s got very heavy with all the fixed SAR gear, like doppler, we often used to take off without any shore diversion fuel. In the event of an engine failure you had to burn off fuel down to your (pre-calculated) single engine weight and then you basically flew a fairly steep approach to a point at which you overpitched on to the deck (we had no single-engine hover ability). There was an approved graph for calculating the weight and pilots had to be checked out on single-engine landings every 90 days (I think it was). Many of us were unhappy as to what we'd have to do in the event of, for example, a tail rotor failure.
soggyboxers is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2007 | 13:30
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 829
Likes: 9
From: taking up the hold
Mayne-Bristow Wessex

From www.skyweaver.co.uk

http://209.196.171.35/article_Ianclark.htm

ANOTHER BRISTOW FIRST

By Ian Clark.
(Originally written 1968)300 Miles North of the Tropic of Capricorn (that mysterious line that marks the southernmost declination of the sun), lies the little township of Broome. Situated on the North Western coast of Western Australia, Broome - present day multi-racial population 1,500 - was until recently the crowded, colourful and rowdy centre of the Australian pearling industry. It now houses the base camp for a unique Burmah Oil Company drilling venture, and is the site of the latest operation of Bristow Helicopters.

In September 1967 an advance Bristow crew arrived in Perth, WA to commence assembling a Wessex 60 twin turbine Helicopter, G-AVEW. This helicopter similar to those used on the North Sea by Bristows but with an additional long Range tank fitted, had been crated and shipped from the UK a couple of months earlier. After assembly and test flying, the aircraft was ferried the 1,300 miles North to Broome and in early October operations for Burmah began.

The Wessex 60 which cruises at 100 Knots and is cleared for operations in temperatures of 115 F, is supplying the offshore Drilling vessel ‘Investigator’ drilling Burmah Oil’s first wildcat well in Western Australia. Floating in the Timor Sea on the edge of the Ashmore Reef, the Investigator is drilling in 130 ft. of water, 365 nautical miles north of Broome and less than 80 nm. from Indonesia The flight between Broome and the Ashmore Reef is the longest offshore rig supply flight ever undertaken by helicopter and is another first for Bristows. To achieve this flight, unmanned refuelling stations have been set up along the route on two tiny, conveniently situated, coral islands. The longest sector is 140 nm and refuelling is undertaken by designated crews from the 13/14 passengers carried. Initially a crew of 2 was carried but dispensation was eventually obtained from the Australian D.C.A. for single pilot operations. The pilot is in contact on HF radio at all times with Broome or Darwin and 24 hour Non Directional Beacons situated at the refuelling points, are used for navigational purposes.

Drilling crews leave Perth by DC3 at 9 o’clock on the evening prior to the crew change. They arrive at Broome 8 hours later where, after a hasty breakfast, they board the helicopter for the 4 hour flight to the rig. Refuelling and a quick lunch for the pilot on the rig and the helicopter takes off for the return flight. Two refuelling stops and 4 hours later the helicopter is back in Broome and the drilling crew boards the DC3 for the 8 hour flight back to Perth. Crew changes take place twice weekly and extra service flights bring the total flying to over 100 hours each month. The long flight is further complicated by the uncertain weather conditions, since the whole area lies in the Australian Cyclone belt. During the months of December through February winds in excess of 100 mph can sweep across the route of the helicopter. Flying however continues during this period with the help of Darwin Meteorological facilities who accurately plot the Cyclones courses and give ample forewarnings for shipping and aircraft.

After completion off Ashmore Reef the operation will be moving 250 miles south to Point Samson to drill 2 wildcat wells 70 miles off the coast, which compared to Ashmore will be a relatively easy task for the helicopter pilots and rig crews. At the end of 1968 present plans call for further exploration in the vicinity of Ashmore Reef with a possibility of locations even further out from Broome, which will be yet another challenge for Bristow Helicopters.
Tail-take-off is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2007 | 13:56
  #39 (permalink)  

Combine Operations
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
What about the shortest, then? Mine was about ten yards - well, maybe a bit more - from the rig on which we were based to the platform to which it was attached. If the bridge between the two installations was out of service, we had to shuttle people to and fro.

The first time I did it, immediately after take-off, the copilot put the heater on full (in summer), and switched on the radar. I managed to stop him retracting the undercarriage.

More time spent on deck than in the air. Flight planning was a bitch.
Farmer 1 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2007 | 14:37
  #40 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
Veteran: National Guard
 
Joined: May 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 18,633
Likes: 1,072
From: Downeast
ERA in Alaska did some long distance flying out to the Chukchi Sea as I recall along with doing IFR/IMC sling load work.

Perhaps an ERA hand can provide some details of the early Alaska work with Chinooks.
SASless is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.