Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Customs wants to 'shoot from choppers'

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Customs wants to 'shoot from choppers'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2006, 23:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customs wants to 'shoot from choppers'

Recently on the Courier Mail:

Stupid of me to think they'd actually want to use this to stop illegal activites!

CUSTOMS officials want to be able to fire weapons from helicopters to better protect Australia's borders and fishing grounds.
The capacity to shoot from the air will be part of the Rapid Response Helicopter Service the Australian Customs Service plans to launch in January, The Australian newspaper reports today.
Tender documents say the helicopter will "enhance Australia's fisheries and maritime surveillance, compliance and enforcement arrangements in Northern Australia".
But officials have ruled out following the example of US customs, which uses sharpshooters in helicopters to disable the engines of illegal vessels.
Customs officers would only be able to fire at feral animals that come onto mainland Australia from illegal fishing vessels, a Customs spokesman said.
"If a foreign fishing vessel brought with it a feral animal that was considered to be a quarantine risk ... then we would need to have the capability to destroy that animal," the spokesman told the newspaper.
Customs has called for companies to tender for the Rapid Response Helicopter Service, which would be on standby at Gove in East Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory.
Bat-Off is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 00:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,298
Received 521 Likes on 217 Posts
Now let me get this straight.....forget Terrorists, Pirates, and drug smugglers....but shooting the Ship's Cat is fair dinkum?

You Aussies are some rough company brother!

Last edited by SASless; 13th Sep 2006 at 01:24.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 00:34
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you seen an Indonesian Sampan? Those things are hard-core! The meer sight of them causes RAN Frigates to change direction!
Bat-Off is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 00:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vic.Aust
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Port and Starboard Mini Guns on the 412 should do the job.
Twin Head is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 01:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Outback
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...Port and Starboard Mini Guns on the 412 should do the job....

No-one left to fly the 412's.... if the rumours are right.
blade root is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 02:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: somedays in a helicopter, other days in a fixed-wing....
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

One would think if Customs helicopters were armed it would help detour potential smugglers, illegal fishing etc. .
Not saying it would stop it!
but wouldn't it help to have that extra card there incase needed...wether it be for animals, pirates, smugglers. . . bit of extra force.
jetflite is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 03:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Media Beatup!

Would not this operation, as described, simply be the discharge of firearms for feral animal control that every operator in australia has issued by CASA?
itoldyouso is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: australia
Age: 60
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Customs weapons ops from helos

Sounds like its a job for the our Huey gunships!! bring back the miniguns and rockets!! "clear in live" on the feral animal at 1000 yards!!
crewguard is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:15
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 59
Posts: 215
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SASless
Now let me get this straight.....forget Terrorists, Pirates, and drug smugglers....but shooting the Ship's Cat is fair dinkum?

You Aussies are some rough company brother!
Dude, you slay me...ahhh, the s--t that they think up in Customs...not only do they want to shoot the ships CAT, but they want to do it from the air (cause, you know, those Indonesian cats can tear your ass off for you if you get in close enough on the ground for a high powered rifle shot).

What could possibly go wrong?

HP
helopat is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 59
Posts: 215
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jetflite
One would think if Customs helicopters were armed it would help detour potential smugglers, illegal fishing etc. .
Not saying it would stop it!
but wouldn't it help to have that extra card there incase needed...wether it be for animals, pirates, smugglers. . . bit of extra force.
Jet,

Have you ever heard of ROE (rules of engagement)...truth of the matter is that if they had guns aboard they'd probably never use the bloody things ("Sir , I can't believe it, we've waved our guns at the people smugglers and they aren't turning back...what should we do?" "Take them out Smedley...no prisoners!")

Sheeesh!

Pollys just love this type of shiite

HP
helopat is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 11:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Uperuberboot
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I happen to believe that it would be an excellent idea to follow the us customs model as far as employing a sharpshooter armed with a .50 cal sniper rifle to take out "illegal" cats. (bloody nuisance..they are!)

As a "liberationist" who in a previous life not that long ago, regularly hunted ferals with .22 subsonics, I am now all for the option of the one-shot kill.

I am guessing the only problem that could arise is having to prove that you had just shot at a cat!

Last edited by bloodycrow; 13th Sep 2006 at 11:56.
bloodycrow is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 12:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: somedays in a helicopter, other days in a fixed-wing....
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by helopat
Jet,
Have you ever heard of ROE (rules of engagement)...truth of the matter is that if they had guns aboard they'd probably never use the bloody things ("Sir , I can't believe it, we've waved our guns at the people smugglers and they aren't turning back...what should we do?" "Take them out Smedley...no prisoners!")
Sheeesh!
Pollys just love this type of shiite
HP
Tis true. . good point. Although whether they use them or not, i feel it would be benificial to have that option. Yes i am familiar with ROE, hence the reason to have an Op's & Procedures manual. . stating ROE.
I think firing a few "shots across the bow" would be more efficient than a 412 "In pursuit" of a smuggler/fishing/immigrant vesel. . 3 warnings. STOP. STOP. STOP. then 3 warning shots. Then shot to imobilise. Then Call in the Customs or RAN frigates, now they are no longer in pursuit of a moving vesel. Seems logical.

JF
jetflite is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 14:21
  #13 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warning Shots cause problems. If your going to shoot at something, you should have the mindset that you are going to kill it AND be able to convince a reasonable person (not a Government Official) that there was an extreme threat.
One example in the Caribbean when one of the Border patrol boats fired some warning shots at a smuggling boat and took off the head of the driver with a 50 cal. It got my vote, but it caused big problems.
B Sousa is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 18:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Age: 64
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we get into a serious health and safety issue here.

If people are going to start shooting from helicopters it can only be a matter of time before the crafty little feline buggers get hold of their own weapons and start shooting back.

I have to think that in this situation, the odds are stacked firmly in favour of the cats. Small, agile, fast and able to take advantage of natural cover they would present a considerable challenge as a target. However a large low flying helicopter would be easy prey for the nasty little yellow eyed monsters to hit.

They are natural hunters and would have no second thoughts about bringing down a helicopter. It would be another 'Black Hawk Down' scenario. There would be blood, tears and recriminations. It would not be good.

IMHO you should leave the actual hunting to the ground troops and leave the helos to do what they are best at, insertions and cas-evacs.
Lord Mount is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 20:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 59
Posts: 215
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jetflite
Tis true. . good point. Although whether they use them or not, i feel it would be benificial to have that option. Yes i am familiar with ROE, hence the reason to have an Op's & Procedures manual. . stating ROE.
I think firing a few "shots across the bow" would be more efficient than a 412 "In pursuit" of a smuggler/fishing/immigrant vesel. . 3 warnings. STOP. STOP. STOP. then 3 warning shots. Then shot to imobilise. Then Call in the Customs or RAN frigates, now they are no longer in pursuit of a moving vesel. Seems logical.
JF
See, the problem becomes "can you immobilise a ship (or a ships cat) EFFECTIVELY with a .50 cal?"...I'm not so sure. I've been there when the navy has fired warning shots...these people are desparate and after crossing from someplace like Africa to Australia, they're not interested in stopping for anything or anybody. In addition, ROE is usually to try to get them to turn back...can't do that if the engine (or the captains head) is blown off...just full of 'bad press' potential.

The discussion of cats fighting back...priceless. I imagine a cat with a sniper rifle...several helicopters carved into the stock...moving stealthly through the bush. You're right,Lord Mount , they're merciless killing machines.

HP

Last edited by helopat; 14th Sep 2006 at 03:05.
helopat is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 22:03
  #16 (permalink)  
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS/KFAI
Posts: 4,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"helos to do what they are best at, insertions and cas-evacs."

Lord Mount
I would suggest you talk to some of those former NVA just to the North of OZ land. They can tell you that when the Pilots showed how skinny the AH-1 really was, they learned just how bad Twin Minis and Flechette Rockets could be.

Personally I would love to see a country today that had enough balls to tell Smugglers to "Heave Too" and when they didnt just blow their butts out of the water.

Last edited by B Sousa; 13th Sep 2006 at 22:22.
B Sousa is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 22:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,298
Received 521 Likes on 217 Posts
Snipers might drive tacks....but nail driving is a delight to a Cobra pilot....granted 17 pounders can be a chuckle as well.
SASless is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2006, 22:12
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a lighter note, things like this are going to boost the rotary wing assett for customs, providing more jobs for those up and coming pilots
Bat-Off is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 00:22
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: somedays in a helicopter, other days in a fixed-wing....
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by helopat
See, the problem becomes "can you immobilise a ship EFFECTIVELY with a .50 cal?"...I'm not so sure. I've been there when the navy has fired warning shots...these people are desparate and after crossing from someplace like Africa to Australia, they're not interested in stopping for anything or anybody. In addition, ROE is usually to try to get them to turn back...can't do that if the engine (or the captains head) is blown off...just full of 'bad press' potential.

The discussion of cats fighting back...priceless. I imagine a cat with a sniper rifle...several helicopters carved into the stock...moving stealthly through the bush. You're right,Lord Mount , they're merciless killing machines.

HP
Good point; but you also have to look at it from every angle, ROE is to get them to turn back. so you wouldn't shoot out a vesel's engine if you want them to use it! You would "imobilise" them if you wanted them "imobilised".
Immigrants: You want them to use there engines!
Illegal Fishing: You want to arrest them, easier when they are not moving.
Smugglers: Once agian, arrested, easier when not moving.
It's obvious there are certain situations where a .50 would be useful and others where it isn't. . It's been done elsewhere and it's not a hard to draw up a CLEAR system about when it is and isn't appropriate. You don't always have to shoot to blow a head off, you don't always shoot to kill.

Clearly if they shot a warnig shot at the vesel and blew the guys head off....get someone who can shoot!
jetflite is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2006, 00:43
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,298
Received 521 Likes on 217 Posts
Whack them in the noggin....what more warning can they want? They cease the offensive behaviour immediately. Sorted!
SASless is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.