Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Wingover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2005, 10:23
  #21 (permalink)  
Passion Flying Hobby Science Sponsor Work
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IAS

Fully agree, this is what I tried to state with anticipation: you can not read 20 knts, but you may have an indication of that when seeing the IAS drop.

d3
delta3 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 10:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Both these manouevres should be 100% visual ones, not looking in at airspeed/bank/balance etc

Don't forget: BALANCE which differentiates between the smooth slick end result and a very sloppy ragged one.
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 10:30
  #23 (permalink)  
Passion Flying Hobby Science Sponsor Work
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Belgium
Age: 68
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TC

Agree, but -maybe wrongly- I first did this at high altitudes more than 1000 feet (before starting), and I felt that the visual clues were a little vage. Is perhaps an argument not to go too high.

Relying on pure external visual clues also links in with the arguments in this discussion about wind direction.

Maybe a related question that I wandered about: in refinement of the lesson 1 and 2 segmentation, what is the best progressive way to learn this maneuver ?. Especially in theetering rotors (cfr earlier remark of R22 pilot), you may want to avoid unusual attitudes.

Added : 1. Start on a windless day.
2. ....

d3

Last edited by delta3; 29th Nov 2005 at 10:49.
delta3 is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 12:04
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
D3 - to start wingovers use 20 -30 degrees nose up and 45 - 60 degrees AoB - that will give a nice gentle wingover and help sort out the coordination of controls (generally leave the collective alone during the wingover and fly it on cyclic) especially, as TC highlights, balance. Once happy then 45 nose up and 90 AoB are good figures to aim for. Wingovers in an R22 aren't a problem providing you don't chicken out and shove the nose forward (bunt) to recover from the nose up attitude.

To start pedal turns or torque turns use about 45 degrees nose up and once you are comfortable with the manoeuvre, gradually increase the amount of nose up until you chicken out or get to 90 degrees. Be warned, the cyclic inputs required as you yaw at the top of the manoeuvre may seem a little odd but you are compensating for the secondary effect of yaw which is roll and an element of flapback. Once you get as far as 90 degrees nose up for the manoeuvre, consider lowering the lever as that will help you track vertically.

Always best to fly with someone who can do these manoeuvres properly to learn them rather than try it out for yourself.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 14:53
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Strongly concur with crabs last para. DO NOT attempt a torque turn unless very experienced in general AND on type. Make sure your first Torque turn is demonstrated by an experienced instructor

If you cock up that 90 degree nose up, you could end up - upside down or even side slipping backwards

Proper torque turns are borderline aerobatics - be warned.
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 15:16
  #26 (permalink)  
FLI
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wing-overs are easy to fly. The danger is during the recovery.

The manoeuvre is generally taught at 300 ft agl. The height gained during the pull up could be 200 ft depending on pitch up angle.

The danger occurs during the recovery as the helicopter is accelerating downwards at the same rate as it was decelerated upwards. If the pilot does not level out at the entry height, ie 300 ft, but attempts to go much lower, he then has a much greater acceleration towards the ground, both vertically and horizontally. If he then attempts to recover with too much aft cyclic, he effectively “stalls” a large proportion of the rotor disc and the helicopter continues to descend. If he now pulls collective he increases the amount of “stall” and hits the ground! The only recovery is to reduce the aft cyclic input (difficult when you are approaching the ground fast).

This is a gotcha for even experienced pilots.
FLI is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 17:59
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edited.



(Skitsz posted to say he's not impressed. He didn't say why.)

Heliport
skitzs is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2005, 13:19
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
I think Skitz was criticising FLIs post regarding retreating blade stall during high speed recovery from a wingover/torque turn. FLI forgets how much you have to push forward cyclic just to overcome flapback so excess speed is a result of excess forward cyclic - not somthing that comes naturally to most pilots.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.