Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Tigers for Australia

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Tigers for Australia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th August 2001 | 05:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, Australia
Thumbs up Tigers for Australia

Hot off the press, the Eurocpter Tiger has won the bid to supply the ARH for Australia.
ozy_rotorhead is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 06:15
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 62
From: North Queensland, Australia
Talking

Just don't let ******* ***** near it, his Tiger touchdown skills apparently weren't so great - or was that the display pilot?

Just jokes!
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 06:30
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, Australia
Post

It wasn't BDs fault, he was just along for the ride. That french guy almost crashed it in Canberra a couple of weeks before. It was just a matter if time.
ozy_rotorhead is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 06:36
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 62
From: North Queensland, Australia
Post

Yeah, I heard - I was just mucking around.

Re the deal, do you know how many, when, where etc?
Arm out the window is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 07:27
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Out and About
Cool

Heard that the real negotiations start as to final configuration, actual cost, delivery dates etc. No contract has actually been signed as yet. However from what I understand it is just a formality.

Pac Rotors
Pac Rotors is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 09:44
  #6 (permalink)  
collective bias
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

On Ya Aussies,
That some great hardwear to play with and like its been pointed out its got good survivability. Now only if the NZ airforce would do the same.......Still I guess you guys will always be there to help out the old country, so why buy our own?
Personally, I thought the Cobra would have been better suited to the climate and having been tested in the Gulf War would have an advantage.
I would rather be in the Tiger if given the choice, but what were the selling points?
 
Old 10th August 2001 | 11:00
  #7 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Talking

I have heard that they have not yet selected only put the Tiger and Apache on the short list for the next round.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 12:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Out and About
Post

Sultan

There is no next round. Eurocopter have won as preferred tender so now they just have to nut out the nuts and bolts. The contest has basically been and won by the Tiger.
Pac Rotors is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 12:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: perth
Post

Yes Pac Rotors is right,
22 Tigers, and delivery for 2003 or 2004 not certain, also maintenance and some assembly in Brisbane and at Oakey.

I must say its great for the Army to get some gear that is state of the art and quite practical. I just hope the 1 Billion Dollar deal will include the correct amount of flying hours to keep the pilots current, and correct engineering support to keep them operational.

For a change, there are some good helicopter buys for the defence force.

Great for the Industry and the Army crews
sling load is offline  
Old 10th August 2001 | 14:50
  #10 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 65
Likes: 1
From: Faulconbridge, New South Wales, Oz
Angry

Bummer.

I was on the AH-1Z Cobra bid, so if I still want to work on AIR-87 I have to look for a contract with ADI/Eurocopter now.

Secretly pleased it isn't a US product for a change
chips_with_everything is offline  
Old 11th August 2001 | 02:38
  #11 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/new...mtiger0810.xml

for the full story.
Will they be OZ120's now.

Neil
 
Old 12th August 2001 | 08:26
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 724
Likes: 41
From: Arlington, Tx. US
Post

All,

So I heard wrong. Sorry.

Generally, the way these things work is that the brass shortlist two vendors so they can be wined and dined for another year or two. I guess in this case they Paris is good enough.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Old 13th August 2001 | 11:33
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: dunnunder
Thumbs down

its underpowered. it isnt inter operable with ANY american forces. it isnt marinised. we have to pay R and D for hellfire if we are to have it. it isnt proven. we will have to plug into the french/german trg and supply system, or else develop our own from scratch. the french - apparently- will cease supply of parts if we employ the aircraft in a way that is contrary to their desires (as I have heard occured with the mirage during vietnam). the contract was won because eurocopter promised to build a factory in qld to construct 50 or so eurocopter acft a year and sell to...what market? no idea. sure, it might be nice to give someone other than the americans a go, but in reality, we never operate with the french or germans. our whole defence strategy is based on close co-operation with the yanks. so when I land on a yank ship or at a yank farp needing fuel, re-arm or (god help me) parts, they will not be able to provide a thing! I wonder if our electronic equipment will even talk to theirs?
Yes, finally a decision was made. But it is THE WRONG DECISION! Ask anyone around here (ie the blokes who have to fly and operate with the thing) and you'll hear a similar story. Very disappointing!
w_ocker is offline  
Old 16th August 2001 | 03:24
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Canberra
Post

W-Ocker

I also heard that eurocopter may also be purchasing the Army Squirrels back and refurbishing them back into the civvy market...maybe another reason to go with the Tiger.
hueywsh is offline  
Old 16th August 2001 | 04:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Out and About
Post

W-Ocker

Hey I bet they won it because they flew the aircraft into the ground, but still walked away. Crashworthiness might have been a big selling point.
Pac Rotors is offline  
Old 17th August 2001 | 10:52
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Faaaaaa
Cool

Hi guys
I was told Tigers are pretty good for night flying
tropppo is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.