Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Damage to helicopters by airport staff

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Damage to helicopters by airport staff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th August 2004 | 10:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Angry Damage to helicopters by airport staff

Do any UK based helicopter (or aircraft) operators/ owners have experience of airport staff causing damage to aircraft, and the legal implications of this?

Our base airport caused damage to a rotorcraft (careless handling, admitted by staff at the time) and have subsequently refused to pay for the damage repairs etc from their insurance.

Basically, the airport now contend that if they damage any aircraft landing or parked there, the they shall have no responsibility whatsoever.

This is a GA airfield with no scheduled flights, but an agressive property developer owner.

Any known precedent (UK only, as this is a "law thing") for airfields accepting resposnibility for their actions?



helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 26th August 2004 | 13:03
  #2 (permalink)  

Senis Semper Fidelis
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire U K
Hey Redeye,


Pass the name to me, I'll send big Jimmy round, we only charge very little, perhaps a flight, a couple of steaks and a bottle or three. But liability is not accepted for any spilt liquids,

Know wot I mean!

Vfrpilotpb is offline  
Old 26th August 2004 | 13:10
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Devil

None serious comment from the wrong side of the Pennines.

Any experience of damage at Blackpool, Barton or Liverpool?


helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 26th August 2004 | 19:12
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
For anybody interested in an update on this, the loss adjusters have just recommended payment of the claim but the airport have decided to reject their lawyers and professional advisors advice.

Anybody come across this before in the UK?

helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 27th August 2004 | 08:04
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Thanks, Martin Robinson of AOPA gave similiar advice. The costs will exceed the claim.

He also noted the point about insurance. If no damage was ever to be done and contracturally no blame could ever be attributed then no airport/ airfield would ever need to waste money on insurance.

I've kept the damaged tail stabiliser (quite large on an R44) for "lateral insertion" should the need arise ...



helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 27th August 2004 | 11:40
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 438
Likes: 2
From: Derby
The costs will exceed the claim
That's exactly what they rely on. If it costs (say) 5K to claim 2K, and you win their insurance pays 7K; if you lose, you personally have stumped up the 5K claim and still have to lay out the 2K repair bill.

Bs.
Robbo Jock is offline  
Old 27th August 2004 | 12:09
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
What basis would they have for victory?

Staff admitted the damage at the time (good).

Airfield procedures only allow authorised staff to push out helicopters and aeroplanes.

The aircraft was not parked in the hangar space that was sold to the operator but another, unsuitable, building and as a result damage was caused.

Interested to hear of cases where UK airports/ fields have won in these circumstances (and lost) as it builds up the case one way or the other to act.
helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 27th August 2004 | 14:00
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter

Better red than ...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: Appleby-in-Westmorland Cumbria England
Thumbs up

Thanks also to one or two "private" replies on this matter that have come through the PruneNet.


Watch out €h&8$8ld City Airport!!



helicopter-redeye is offline  
Old 27th August 2004 | 20:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: ----------
On the helicopter side at Blackpool our own engineers move our A/Cs about helicentre, site there R22m in the middle of the field by the tower most of the time they handle the other 22 out of the hangar so little course for pos damage there not clear what happens at the bottom end of the site with the other guys though although there is a bit of a squize at that end due to planks.

Sincerely

Bravo 99 (AJB)
Bravo 99 (AJB) is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.