Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Police observers - passengers or crew?

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Police observers - passengers or crew?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2005, 19:43
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If obliged to follow CAA duty time limitations observers would still be able to clock up 30 hours overtime a month. (40 hours if on a standard 37.5 hr week)
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 31st May 2005, 19:46
  #122 (permalink)  
Tightgit
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The artist formerly known as john du'pruyting
Age: 65
Posts: 804
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Bertie, that would depend on what type of shift pattern they were on. Ours wouldn't get any (unless they were on leave...)
handysnaks is offline  
Old 31st May 2005, 21:40
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: UK
Age: 72
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was just indicating that being subject to CAA limits would not in theory prevent overtime, (quite a lot of overtime in fact) for anyone who enjoys the 'standard' working week, eg police observers or hems crew.
Bertie Thruster is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 20:28
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: I have no idea but the view's great.
Posts: 1,272
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Ark

As with Letsby my comment was made at a time when this was a stand alone thread and not part of the larger one. My comment was not meant as part of that thread and it was never my intention that it should be taken as part of the previous thread nor that it should be seen in that light. If, now that the threads have been merged, you or anyone else would like me to edit or remove it then I will certainly do so as I would not wish to cause offence, least of all to those who have been on the blunt end of this legislation.
J.A.F.O. is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2005, 09:50
  #125 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Guys,

I didn't realise that this was now a merged thread.

Had a beer or three with 442 the other day.

He's just had another operation to try and regain mobility in his neck. Hopefully it'll work.
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 00:22
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Iceland
Age: 53
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't had the patience to read through all the posts here and I would like to address a question.

I know that police work with a helicopter is a demanding job but if the observer is considered as a passenger by the CAA, why don't they consider photographers as passengers also?

Aerial photography and Police work, isn't it a different porridge in the same bowl?
Heli-Ice is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 10:24
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 900
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Well you know what Heli-ice, they do!

Jim
JimL is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 11:03
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Heli-ice, it's not appropriate to compare a police observer's role to that of a photographer [well not most of them anyway...]. A lot of an observer's job is done in the office, reviewing/rejecting/planning task requests and on scene the job is constantly changing.

The main reason police observers are not considered crew [which in practice they clearly are] is pressure from police management through the government to the CAA. Crew status would require control of those staff by an outside agency [medicals, licensing, duty periods etc] and the police as an organisation are not prepared to relinquish that control.

Theoretically a police observer could be ordered to work a second duty out on the streets immediately after a flying duty, though the reverse should not be possible because the aircraft commander has the power not to carry the observer on safety grounds.
Droopy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.