Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter down in Brisbane - incl ATSB Report

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter down in Brisbane - incl ATSB Report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2004, 05:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone heard of Duty of Care?
John Abersynth is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2004, 07:38
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,387
Received 220 Likes on 100 Posts
Yes, I have heard of duty of care.

But I don't think it applies to a case like this, where the operator has laid down specific limits, and only allows landings that are permitted under those requirements. They are not subsequently liable if some wombat goes outside those limits either through ignorance or by choice.

If it did apply, then somebody who has built a trolley for their R22 would have to make it big enough for a Mil-26 in case it decided to land there.

Similarly Parramatta Road doesn't have to allow for jumbos to land on it, or for coal trains to rumble through Broadway.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 10th Aug 2004, 10:25
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the cockpit
Posts: 1,084
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Duty of Care? um,...., oh yes, rings a bell. Think I have heard of it.
And the relevance to your comments above is........................???
helmet fire is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2004, 11:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The builder of the R22 trolly does not have to make it large enough for a mil26 but if he is to allow the public to use his trolly he has the responsibility to let those people know of it's limits and to be sure that they know the limits.
beantoo is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2004, 02:07
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Australia
Age: 47
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr S, M100

Unfortunately it only takes one mishap and facilitys like these soon go due to political or public pressure as well as insurance and liability issues.

im afraid in this country of ANTI EVERYTHING once gone it wont be back. i agree if the operator of the pontoon has specified a weight limit and this helo was over the limit knowingly his insurance company wont be too happy,

or if unknowingly he should have asked for permission and requested the procedures and restrictions it may have in place ie: weight limit!!

lawyers can now argue against this pad being closed down, but you all know who the winners are out of that!

A shame i agree...
belly tank is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 00:25
  #26 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A109C VH-ZZN BNE River Helipad 07-2004 ATSB report

Final ATSB report out:
http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...200402820.aspx

I started looking for the original thread about this, but with the search function not working for older threads I realised this could take quite some time - if moderators have a better way of searching perhaps they could link the two but for now ...
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 09:10
  #27 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aw crap.

Mods, feel free to merge threads while I take myself out the back and slap myself with a wet towel.
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 09:13
  #28 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final ATSB report out:
http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...200402820.aspx

After removing foot from mouth ...
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 17:25
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the moment
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was a new helipad built elsewhere to replace this one?


Creaser
Creaser is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 22:29
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geographically misplaced, but never lost.
Age: 53
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope and that is unlikely unless it is an operator that intends to do it. I think the Qld Gov don't want to go near it again after what happened and the fall out
Texdoc is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2006, 23:41
  #31 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So ... operators in Brisbane, if the Client requested to be picked up at the airport and flown to a meeting in the CBD, could you do it?

Any enterprising sorts thought about approaching a forward-thinking building owner to place a rooftop helipad? Is there one already that I just don't know about? I suppose you could land in the Botanic Gardens ... maybe.
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2006, 01:33
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geographically misplaced, but never lost.
Age: 53
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is one 'marked' on a building in Brisbane CBD, might be on Lennon's, if not, then nearby. Never seen it used or even if it has been/is suitable for use. You would think the Casino would like to have an HLS nearby,... like where this one was
Texdoc is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2006, 09:47
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

I recall there used to be a roof top pad on the Sheraton buildong (now the Sofitel?). What became of that? This is going back to the '80's.
vetskone is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2006, 09:58
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Geographically misplaced, but never lost.
Age: 53
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say thats the one I speak of Still there it seems, at least the paint work is?
Texdoc is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2006, 09:06
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Moon
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi

Before the accident was the heli-pad well used and what was the charge for using the pad? What or who is needed to re open such a facility?

Does anyone think it would be well used if it were re opened?

Will
willybear is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 02:14
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the cockpit
Posts: 1,084
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have read the atsb report, and the above comments, but I am still a little in the dark here. I have experience on only one wheeled helicopter and it was a requirement to calculate the PCN (pavement concession number) for flights into airfields, and consider the point loading when landing. Are these requirements not valid on smaller wheeled helicopters? Are the PCNs so small as to not warrant calculation? This is an assumption given the total absence of PCN from the atsb report, and my ignorance of light wheeled helicopter operations. I ask from that absence and my ignorance rather than to make any criticism of the pilot/owner.

Secondly, I note from the report that the helipad owner's organisation had no aviation expertise. Consultants are expensive. How expensive are accidents?

Thirdly, the report does not reflect John A's assertion above that CASA had a duty of care to this pilot to advise him that the HLS had insufficient load bearing abilities for the A109C. And I still agree. Comments?
helmet fire is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.