Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Two killed in A109 near Bournemouth - AAIB report published

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Two killed in A109 near Bournemouth - AAIB report published

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2004, 20:50
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Harlow UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thomas Coupling,

The Accident Bulletin is at:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/group...ty_027966.hcsp

Then type "Max Radford" into Pprune search tool and read the threads.

Read the facts not the gossip.

49ers
scenictours49 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 09:01
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: lancashire
Age: 53
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cause of helicopter crash still unclear

See the link below, an article in the Times today, looks like there trying to start a conspiracy theory.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspap...636062,00.html

Any views?
on21 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 09:24
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Pewsey, UK
Posts: 1,976
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Compare with the accident involving G-XCEL - the cause in this case is known, but the report still hasn't been published by the AAIB. My understanding (and I'm sure friends of Ian, James or Neville will correct me if I'm wrong, and I'll edit my post if required) is that there may be legal action in the offing so the report is not being published until that is settled.

So an accident four months later which involved someone of interest to the media with no published report - not a conspiracy, IMO, just process.
The Nr Fairy is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 09:31
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicam,

Sorry I hadnt seen your post until this was brought back to the surface today. Had the aaib spoken to you ,as they were trying to speak to everyone who had flown in the 109 with MR?

The report has been given to the relatives a while ago for comment.

Regards
HB
Hover Bovver is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 10:26
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is anybody prepared to disclose what those last 27 sec of ATC recording allegedly contain ?

I have no connection with this accident except having seen the sad wreckage at the AAIB and having flow from Bournemouth around that time.

I fully understand if the answer is 'no'
Three Blades is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 11:37
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It wasnt an intended transmition(open mike), and it isnt full of chatter.
Hover Bovver is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 12:16
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HB
Some interesting sounds then perhaps...
TB
Three Blades is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 15:45
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: england
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hover bovver

Yes i did speak to the AAIB regarding the accident as i went to see Maxs girlfriend a few days after it all happened and bumped into them at Red Aviation.

From what I saw Max seemed to understand the aircraft quite well, and was keen to further his knowledge of the aircraft by doing a few hand holding days with an A109 operator. I guess if Max had not of been on the ILS in a stabed aircraft the question about what happened may of been a bit more clear cut


helicam
helicam is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2005, 16:38
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ask the voices!
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing that things like the recording are not released for Joe Public to listen to???

There may not be anything said on there, but as was said before, you may be able to hear something going on in the background.

I think there are a lot of people who would like a definate answer to what happened, but will we ever know?
HeliEng is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 07:39
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Harwich
Age: 65
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AAIB Report, June 2005

Link to report - here.

Says no evidence of sabotage; conclusion is disorientation in poor weather.
Hilico is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 13:01
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow...
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't understad the bit about the LOW RPM warning horn. I thought helicopters had governors that ensured the engine operated at the correct rpm. The report says both engines were functioning normally, so why would there be a loss of rotor rpm?

Guess sabotage has been ruled out now.

ETC
eoincarey is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 13:13
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A governor can only modulate power within a range determined by limits set by either the governor system itself, or the maximum power available from the engines, assuming the drive is intact.

Pull the lever too far and rotor rpm will ultimately droop once this limit is reached.
rotorspeed is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 13:24
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,278
Received 339 Likes on 191 Posts
If you demand more power than the engines can provide, then the Nr will decay. A governor will only control power within the range of 'idle' to 'Max contingency' (or 30 sec rating), power demand outside that range and the Nr will vary.

I'm curious about the electrical system logic; seems to favour the left hand seat to the right?
212man is online now  
Old 9th Jun 2005, 19:46
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ask the voices!
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found reading that report harrowing.

It dredged back all the feelings from the time of the accident.

I am not convinced by the summary of the report. To me it seems like a standard AAIB cop out, but then I am bias.
HeliEng is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2005, 07:18
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HeliEng

So if you doubt the report, what do you think is a more likely cause for the accident?

Seems to me there was a fair amount of supporting evidence and as ever it looked a pretty thorough investigation.
rotorspeed is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2005, 09:04
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Ask the voices!
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rotorspeed,

To be honest with you I don't know. And in truth I don't think anyone really truly will.

I knew Max for about 5 years, and I just don't believe that cloud would have been the cause of his death. In my opinion he was a very experienced, capable pilot, and I have trusted him with my life on many occasion.

Max and I (and others no doubt) have known helicopter pilots and passengers who have been killed through getting disorientated in cloud, and as such I for sure have a healthy respect for cloud, and fully appreciate how it can turn out.

I don't think this should turn into a debate about flying into cloud, this is just my opinion and the founding of it.


Regards
Helieng
HeliEng is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2005, 17:55
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Helieng - how current was Max in IF?

I have a conspiracy theory which won't go away..................
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 09:32
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why keep the comments to yourself , if things are wrong in the report.
Hover Bovver is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 16:22
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In my tank engine
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I'm about to say is not meant to offend anyone so please don't take offence, I'm sorry some of you lost a good friend.

But take a look at the weather report's from Bournmouth and the neibouring airports poor viss, Low cloud.

An eye witness report said the helicopter flew above him but he could not see it due to low cloud, He also said it was a cold misty night.

Not good weather for a VFR rated pilot to be flying in at night is it, I know I'm not the only here who thinks this.

Maybe the weather was OK till he was nearly at Bournmouth and then rapidly got worse which would have been very difficult for any of us to detect or know about in certain circumstance's.

But this does not change the fact's low viss, low cloud & a non instrument rated pilot at night is not a good combination, Leading to a spatial dis-orientation accident where sadly two people lost there live's.
ThomasTheTankEngine is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2005, 16:27
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: by the seaside
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TC

According to the report he didn't hold a UK instrument and hadn't logged instrument flight since 6th December 1999.

From that date onward he had also only logged 40 minutes night flight until he was converted into the 109E on the 1st January 2004.

Since that date he flew 15 hours 30 minutes at night all in the 109E.
Rotorbike is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.