Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicopter ejection seats

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicopter ejection seats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th January 2004 | 22:40
  #61 (permalink)  

Iconoclast
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
From: The home of Dudley Dooright-Where the lead dog is the only one that gets a change of scenery.
Thumbs up How to avoid officer burgers.

One of the Cheyenne test birds had a downward firing ejector seat in the gunners position. During some tests the pilot operated the helicopter from the front seat. The seat I believe was taken from an Air Force B-47

Lu Zuckerman is offline  
Old 7th January 2004 | 02:16
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Question

Why couldn't there be a system that ejected the blades and then deployed a small parachute from the top of the helicopter? This smaller chute would assure that the craft remained upright and that the vertical speed at ground contact was within the limitations of the seats.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 7th January 2004 | 04:07
  #63 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 747
Likes: 22
From: (LFA 7a)
AC

Here's the gen on civvy ejection seats:

http://www.ejectorseats.co.uk/seat-regs.html

or

http://www.ejectorseats.co.uk/rules.html

Hope this helps?

JG
jimgriff is offline  
Old 7th January 2004 | 06:26
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Dave, I was thinking the same thing as you. I just looked at the oh-58 and thought why not replace the bulky observation equipment with a smaller parachute?
Jcooper is offline  
Old 7th January 2004 | 21:03
  #65 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Australia
I've been wondering about this also - the Cirrus has a parachute that can bring the a/c safely to earth in a catastrophic failure situation, why not for helicopters?

I know I'd love something like that if for whatever reason I found myself in "stone" configuration. Seems like a no-brainer for the manufacturers to come up with.

Imagine what it would do to insurance premiums! Surely this is a Good Thing (TM)?

--
Michael.
wish2bflying is offline  
Old 8th January 2004 | 01:39
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: Gaithersburg, MD
Thumbs up

The concept of parachutes for helicopters was previously discussed here (click link). Personally, I put my hat in the "don't want a parachute on my helicopter" camp. I think you create too many single points of failure with such a complicated system, and it may create more problems than it is worth. Also, there would be an enormous expense in terms of development, testing, certification, and implementation (not to mention weight and performance penalties). Autorotations, autorotations, autorotations, autorotations, autorotations... the more your practice, the better your chances are. In my opinion, it is an unreasonable expectation to eliminate every risk factor by dumping more systems that require more maintenance with smaller margins for error.
RDRickster is offline  
Old 8th January 2004 | 02:46
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Alternatives

OK. Forget the parachute.

How about producing stronger blades and rotor hubs etc. from some of the weight savings that result from the new lightweight materials?

And/Or, a rotor governor that would only start lowering blade pitch if sensors detected any extreme loading on the rotor, which was causing a component to approch its ultimate strength.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 8th January 2004 | 11:08
  #68 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Australia
When I said "stone" configuration, I meant exactly that - catastrophic failure of the rotor system in some way that makes autorotation an impossibility. I believe a parachute would cause far more damage on landing than a well-executed autorotation, but if it slows the machine down enough for the occupants to survive the landing, then it sounds good to me.

--
Michael.
wish2bflying is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.