Why is the A380 called the A380?!
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Where the streets have no name...
Why is the A380 called the A380- what happened to the A350/60/70?
And why is it the A380-800? What happened to 1/2/3/4/5/6/700?
And what happened to the A340-400?
I know they're French, but surely they can count?!
And why is it the A380-800? What happened to 1/2/3/4/5/6/700?
And what happened to the A340-400?
I know they're French, but surely they can count?!
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Europe
The 800 comes from the fact that Airbus are showing potential buysers that they have built the top of the range model first. In other words there shouldn't be a new and improved model on the market in a few years time; this is it! (Fact)
I also read that the 400 model Airbus 340 was avoided since this number was too well associated with Boeing. (Unconfirmed rumour)
I also read that the 400 model Airbus 340 was avoided since this number was too well associated with Boeing. (Unconfirmed rumour)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
From: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Just heard this explanation on the radio on the day Airbus officially launched the project and went from A3XX to A380 :
They asked marketing experts, and they found
A350 would be the normal Name, but that is a too small step in numbers for the step in Aviation, this Plane shall represent.
360 would mean a full circle, so no progress, very bad
370 is bad because the 7 is an unlucky number for our asian carriers, who should buy the plane (don't know why JAL owns Boeing 777, but never mind Boeing might have no marketing experts
)
380 makes sense, two 340 above each other (2*4=8) and looking like the cross section.
That's the outcome if others than engineers decide something
They asked marketing experts, and they found
A350 would be the normal Name, but that is a too small step in numbers for the step in Aviation, this Plane shall represent.
360 would mean a full circle, so no progress, very bad
370 is bad because the 7 is an unlucky number for our asian carriers, who should buy the plane (don't know why JAL owns Boeing 777, but never mind Boeing might have no marketing experts
)380 makes sense, two 340 above each other (2*4=8) and looking like the cross section.
That's the outcome if others than engineers decide something




