Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Moving a GE9X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jul 2018, 18:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New York City
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moving a GE9X

Yes, the new GE9X for the 777x has a massive diameter, but I know it's been on wing on the GE flying testbed. Then I read this article (not allowed to post links yet):

Google search "ge9x volga dnepr" and select the Air Cargo World link that comes up.

From the article, moving the engine from California to Ohio took two years of planning and custom rig work.

Questions for those of you who are knowledgeable:

1) Why didn't they fly it there on the test bed 747? Surely they could've had a regular engine waiting to put back on wing, or even carried one in the 5th engine position?
2) Couldn't the send it by rail? If it's the diameter of a 737 fuselage then we know trains can already handle that (but maybe not on that route?)
3) Why wouldn't they ask Boeing to use the Dreamlifter (LCF)?

Sorry if these seem obvious, I'm just really curious.

Thanks.
RufusXS is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2018, 23:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3) The Dreamlifter is only certified to carry 787 components on the main deck. There is no fire suppression in the cargo bays, so anything that even MIGHT be flammable would likely never get certified.
Intruder is offline  
Old 13th Jul 2018, 00:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New York City
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Intruder
3) The Dreamlifter is only certified to carry 787 components on the main deck. There is no fire suppression in the cargo bays, so anything that even MIGHT be flammable would likely never get certified.
Thanks that’s helpful. I would think if they drained the fluids they might be able to get around that but maybe it’s not worth the certification hassle.

I’m still curious about the other options, especially if the process w Volga is a arduous as the article makes it sound.
RufusXS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.