> >
>

# Operational Flight Plan

Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

# Operational Flight Plan

9th Jan 2018, 19:20

Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CYPRUS
Posts: 11
Operational Flight Plan

Dear all please advise on the attached sample flight plan what is the item s showing values between waypoints with the numbers 7 4 2 1 1

thanks
Attached Images

10th Jan 2018, 02:18

Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 49
Posts: 1,565
wind shear value.
"7" is interesting.

10th Jan 2018, 02:53

Join Date: May 2005
Location: France / UK
Age: 63
Posts: 819
An indication of the possibility of CAT.

10th Jan 2018, 07:31

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wherever I go, there I am
Age: 38
Posts: 605
It depends upon the model the OFP uses to calculate wind, but yes it can be used to identify potential areas of clear air turbulence when used with other meteorological products.

For example, at my operator that value indicates the amount of shear over a 1,000 ft. change in altitude (while another operator may use 2,000 ft.).

In your example and within the model used at my operator, it means the wind will change by 7 knots per 1,000 ft. - for the “7” value, of course - if I were to decide to climb or descend from the planned altitude at that waypoint. Shear values are typically not given for climbs and descents as the variation is too large.

Is that going to be bumpy? Who knows? I’ll look at all the other weather charts I’m given. Maybe it’s a nice, stable atmosphere and a value of 7 is nothing. On the other hand, maybe I’m flying over an active TROWL and I’m going to have my butt handed to me.

Maybe I have a value of 0 indicating no change in wind speed, but the wind is 90 degrees to a mountain range and I’m going to be sitting in the wrong spot of a mountain wave.

I’ve seen values as high as 13 on charts and it’s been super smooth, while a value of 0 resulted in all the sick bags being full (the aforementioned mountain wave).

The value itself means relatively nothing if you use it on its own. Yes, typically the higher the number the greater the chance you’ll encounter turbulence, and the higher the number the greater the severity of the turbulence - but it also requires all other things be equal, which means check your charts.

Last edited by +TSRA; 10th Jan 2018 at 11:38. Reason: Added statement for clarity.

29th Jan 2018, 11:08

Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CYPRUS
Posts: 11
Many thanks.

9th Jul 2018, 20:13

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 295
Looks like JetPlan generated PLog. I believe there's a manual fairly easily accessible online that is worth a cursory look over if your company hasn't given it to you.

11th Jul 2018, 10:35

Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 3,324
Agree - almost certainly Jetplan / Jeppessen.

Its outlined in the Jetplan user manual with a nice formula. Suffice to say that it is over 2000', and the higher the number, the worse!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off