Is there anything you feel could be improved on the planes you fly?
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Is there anything you feel could be improved on the planes you fly?
Hi,
I'm required to start a project, preferably something to do with aerospace, so I was wondering if those that fly had any thoughts on things that could be improved on, because of their practical experience.
I'd like to try and solve a real-world problem.
Thanks
I'm required to start a project, preferably something to do with aerospace, so I was wondering if those that fly had any thoughts on things that could be improved on, because of their practical experience.
I'd like to try and solve a real-world problem.
Thanks
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
Seat cushions, no doubt. My Stressless Ekornes is wonderful. €2000. When B767 came out Boeing triumphed there seats as a revolution is design and had been developed by 'the pilots'. They were rubbish. The cushions collapsed in a few months and the companies refused to replace them. Pilots' unions did nothing. B737NG was no better. Airlines trumpet how good their pax seats are. Mega bucks spend on them. The pilots' seats are not important. It is time for a revolt. Tech log the seats and demand new cushions. It is a disgrace. Get rid of the stupid wool covers. Sweat generators.
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Thanks for the suggestions. But I was thinking something more 'technical'. As an example, I have tested a new wing design on an rc plane that greatly reduces the take off speed and distance needed. I have yet to run the numbers or work out the practically of the wing, but it would be titled something along the lines of 'Redesign of Bush aircraft wing for STOL'.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 4
From: U.K
As long as the wing has been proven to work for many years before I fly it I don't really care,
On the other hand the seats that were designed badly for 4 hours or less of sitting in are now totally inadequate for the new flight time targets
On the other hand the seats that were designed badly for 4 hours or less of sitting in are now totally inadequate for the new flight time targets
Joined: Oct 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 120
From: Wherever I go, there I am
Sometimes CAP_A330, the real problems are not the sexy problems. STOL wings are great and all, but that's a relatively small market compared to pilot seats. As I type, my back feels like someone put hooks in my muscles and started turning. The industry as a whole does not need more STOL. We need more back support.
Joined: Nov 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,144
Likes: 741
From: UK
Airbus: Mechanically linked sidesticks.
Having flown six types with traditional linked yokes, I really like the Airbus sidesticks. But, from a pilot's point of view, I think not having them mechanically linked was a mistake.
I understand the reasons why they are not linked, but if I was designing a sidestick system, I would have them mechanically linked with a release handle somewhere suitable to unlink them in an emergency.
Otherwise one pilot does not fully know what the other is doing with the controls, and this has led to at least one horrendous and unnecessary crash. Also it is very difficult to train cadets the finer points of aircraft control because they cannot "follow through" on the controls by gently holding their yoke/sidestick while the trainer flies and demonstrates a particular manouever, e.g. flare and landing.
PS, your RC model wing might be a major breakthrough in aerodynamics, but given its increased lift, it might actually be very very draggy - something hard to asses with an RC model - and if applied to an airliner it might limit speed and range unacceptably.
Having flown six types with traditional linked yokes, I really like the Airbus sidesticks. But, from a pilot's point of view, I think not having them mechanically linked was a mistake.
I understand the reasons why they are not linked, but if I was designing a sidestick system, I would have them mechanically linked with a release handle somewhere suitable to unlink them in an emergency.
Otherwise one pilot does not fully know what the other is doing with the controls, and this has led to at least one horrendous and unnecessary crash. Also it is very difficult to train cadets the finer points of aircraft control because they cannot "follow through" on the controls by gently holding their yoke/sidestick while the trainer flies and demonstrates a particular manouever, e.g. flare and landing.
PS, your RC model wing might be a major breakthrough in aerodynamics, but given its increased lift, it might actually be very very draggy - something hard to asses with an RC model - and if applied to an airliner it might limit speed and range unacceptably.
Joined: Nov 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,144
Likes: 741
From: UK
Cockpit door beeper that can be cancelled by pressing the master caution switch or something. That bloody noise going off every other minute is a right pain.
@Penko, 'mysterious (seat) levers'? not that difficult to work out, surely?
@Penko, 'mysterious (seat) levers'? not that difficult to work out, surely?
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,761
Likes: 424
From: GA, USA
I'd like a decent size stand up shower in our freighters.
Also like cup holders that swivel so your coffee doesn't spill allover the circuit breaker panel as you rotate somewhat sporty.
And an espresso machine.
Oh and wifi for those long hours in the bunks.
Also like cup holders that swivel so your coffee doesn't spill allover the circuit breaker panel as you rotate somewhat sporty.
And an espresso machine.
Oh and wifi for those long hours in the bunks.
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,693
Likes: 1,290
From: Australia
Re-design the landing gear system on the 737 series so every landing seems smooth with no jarring. If it can be done on the Vickers Viscount which was the most consistently sweetest touch down aircraft I ever flew, surely Boeing could learn from that?
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: naarden
improve refueling time
I think it takes up 30 minutes to completely refuel a Boeing737. The maximum rate is 1,136 ltr/min. The 737 can hold around 23000 liters. For an Airbus A380 that would take a good deal more time. But if the fuel pipe coupling with the tank could be enlarged, then that would presumably allow the refueling time to be reduced, which would improve turn-around times....
