Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Lookout during cruise in upper airspace

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Lookout during cruise in upper airspace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th May 2017, 17:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lookout during cruise in upper airspace

Notwithstanding the legal requirement for the commander to ensure that a lookout is maintained at all times I am looking for reasons for a lookout to be maintained in the cruise in upper airspace assuming aircraft are equipped with TCAS. (I do appreciate that the "see and be seen" concept cannot be guaranteed when flying at high levels at typical cruise speeds).

As a retired experienced airline pilot who teaches flying locally I was asked this question by a PPL holder and I was scraping round for an an answer other than the possibility of TCAS failure or an aircraft flying non transponder.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 27th May 2017, 22:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,823
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Bob, as an experienced pilot (which I'm not) you probably know the eye can deceive you up there.
I was on a controller familiarisation flight returning to Heathrow from Istanbul occupying the jumpseat of a '737 somewhere over what used to be Yugoslavia. We heard an opposite direction '747 check in on frequency at FL330; we were at FL350. Shortly after, we sighted it, but it appeared to the naked eye to be above us, not below us. Anyway we kept watching and its aspect slowly changed as it got closer until it passed underneath us, (the F/O naturally flashed our landing lights and he flashed back) helpfully tripping the radalt which was crabbed at 5,000ft; the 'low altitude' warning went off too!
You've probably experienced this yourself, but it does illustrate the usefulness of keeping a lookout at high level. This was also in the days before TCAS was invented.
chevvron is online now  
Old 28th May 2017, 03:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
The 737 and Embraer head on didn't work out too well for the 737. Fate is the hunter?
megan is offline  
Old 28th May 2017, 09:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a pilot here but I was impressed by a thread on adopting solidly good habits and finesse. So looking out it might be one of those habits

Thread here: http://www.pprune.org/tech-log/59360...g-finesse.html
Rwy in Sight is online now  
Old 28th May 2017, 13:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You are all suggesting that 'lookout' is only a safety issue. If you don't look out where do you look? Surely one of the reasons of being a pilot is to have the best view in the office and you're supposed to enjoy it. I always wonder why so many people walk along the street looking at their feet as the world passes them by; even on the golf course. Astonishing.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 28th May 2017, 14:37
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,230
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
It's not only traffic you're looking for.
Also weather phenomena.
Thunderstorms, rotor clouds or anything embedded that only reveals itself by the top sticking out of an overcast.
One day I spotted a Walmart Happy birthday balloon that made it to 41,000.
It will give you quite a scare if you're zipping along at 500mph and you miss it by 10 feet.
B2N2 is online now  
Old 28th May 2017, 16:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,823
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by RAT 5
I always wonder why so many people walk along the street looking at their feet as the world passes them by;
They're actually looking at their mobile 'phones not their feet!
chevvron is online now  
Old 28th May 2017, 17:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In these days of phones with very good cameras, the lookout seems to be for photo opportunities!
tubby linton is offline  
Old 29th May 2017, 02:55
  #9 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless your eyes are naturally focused on something outside the flight deck then they naturally focus about nine inches on the other side of the glass, particularly relevant at night.
parabellum is offline  
Old 29th May 2017, 12:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Er...what rules apply flying airways?
IFR
The clue is in the name. Instrument.
There is no requirement to keep a lookout in IMC, indeed in many cases it cannot be done - of in instrument conditions.
Not saying it shouldn't be done if it can be, just that there is no need or requirement to.
noflynomore is offline  
Old 30th May 2017, 10:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Er, no. Flying IFR does not relieve the crew of the responsibility to maintain a lookout. IFR and IMC are two different things. The vast majority of IFR is done in VMC. When flying IFR it is required to maintain a lookout anytime you are VMC, which is most of the time in the cruise. It is common to make a visual approach under IFR, maybe you wouldn't lookout but professionals know they are required to.
oggers is offline  
Old 30th May 2017, 11:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
under IFR, maybe you wouldn't lookout but professionals know they are required to.

Indeed: there was occasion for a CP to issue a 'notice to crews' that placing enroute charts in the front windows to shade the piercing sun during crz was not allowable. The SOP was no curtains.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 30th May 2017, 14:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You might ask the DL crew, charts for shades, about lookout over the ocean. Late 80s they passed within 200' of a Continental 747; having combined shades with a GNE.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 30th May 2017, 17:09
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The guys at Air India were caught out doing the newspapers for sunblinds trick about 6 years ago.........

deadspin-quote-carrot-aligned-w-bgr-2
Dave Clarke Fife is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 00:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
A QF 744 and a C-5 missed by 15 meters over Thailand years ago. In cloud at the time, but it would be nice to see it coming if you could.
megan is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 21:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
under IFR, maybe you wouldn't lookout but professionals know they are required to.
Concorde pilots were clearly not Professionals then...or were they somehow exempt?
noflynomore is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 15:19
  #17 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was part of the design and certification of an unusual airplane.
aterpster is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 16:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,414
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I doubt Concorde pilots had a lot of traffic to look out for.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 18:08
  #19 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect that point wasn't lost on the certifying authorities.
aterpster is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 02:29
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
I doubt Concorde pilots had a lot of traffic to look out for
Still things to hit GF. SR-71 crew in the cruise reported just missing a weather balloon.
megan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.