Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Should Synthetic Vision be placed on commercial Aircraft?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Should Synthetic Vision be placed on commercial Aircraft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th March 2014 | 14:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Should Synthetic Vision be placed on commercial Aircraft?

There are studies out there which state that Synthetic Vision increases a Pilot's Situation-Awareness along with other safety factors. Although SVS are common in Private aircraft, why are Airbus or other commercial aircraft manufacturers not yet implementing these design onto larger aircraft?

If the current glass displays were replaced with slightly larger LCD screens and powerful graphics and processing hardware were implemented also, with slight movement of gauge dials around the central panel (all gauges that were partly on the left remain on the LHS and same for the RHS), would this not be a positive step towards the future of cockpit design?

What are your thoughts on this matter?

Cheers!
Liam1407 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th March 2014 | 21:48
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 566
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Simples, there is no operational advantage to adding SVS, no lowered minimums, no new cost savings, nada.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th March 2014 | 00:41
  #3 (permalink)  
Mistrust in Management
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 986
Likes: 11
From: UK
Agree with Galaxy. What's the point if no safety advantage and increased cost.

Professional pilots should be able to work with the instrumentation they have down to the minima prescribed.
exeng is offline  
Reply
Old 30th March 2014 | 01:16
  #4 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 566
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
I will add, it's a darn fit bit of kit and great to have. On the Global, it is even presented in the HGS.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 30th March 2014 | 02:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Sale, Australia
Some operators working at night into outback strips here in Oz have IR fitted to the aircraft purely for ensuring the strip is clear of wildlife, kangaroos, cattle etc.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Reply
Old 31st March 2014 | 07:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: earth
The mindset is that HUD with FLIR will allow aircraft to taxi and T/O in 0 RVR conditions. Latter to be expected is to be a lesser CAT qualification for landing.
grounded27 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2014 | 20:38
  #7 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Another question might be - Why shouldn't SVS be........

The ability to fuse a variety of imagery in front of the PF shouldn't be limited by current thinking.

Remember when HUDs and NVGs were just for the Mil?
 
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.