Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Four Engines More Maintenance Cost Efficient?

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Four Engines More Maintenance Cost Efficient?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jun 2012, 09:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Age: 74
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Four Engines More Maintenance Cost Efficient?

I was reading the Airbus website, dropped over to the A340-600 page (A340-600 aircraft: A340-600 range, specifications (dimensions, seating capacity, performance), cabin | Airbus*| Airbus, a leading aircraft manufacturer), and midway down the page the following statement pops up:

In addition, the use of four engines – as opposed to two larger powerplants – allows for a 13 per cent reduction in maintenance costs for operators.

This just doesn't add up for me. If 4 engines create a 13 percent reduction in maintenance costs, then why are the skies filled with large powerplant twins? Does this have something to do with extended/long range flying? If yes, where's the cutoff?

TIA

Last edited by StrongEagle; 7th Jun 2012 at 09:37.
StrongEagle is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2012, 08:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try telling that to a BAe146 operator. It is widely thought that it would have been a world beater if it had only had two donks instead of four. Maintenance costs on a small engine aren't greatly different from a larger one so four must surely be far more costly than two?
I wonder what figures Airbus is basing that statement on - sounds like spin to me.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2012, 09:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely a marketing spin, and one that didn't work out apparently. Those big twins are still produced as fast as possible, the A340 is no longer in production and never sold much anyway.
Denti is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2012, 16:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Perhaps they're including in their comparison every additional costly bit related to ETOPS maintenance rules that they can find?
Tinstaafl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.