Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Autoland- "fault protection"

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Autoland- "fault protection"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th July 2001 | 12:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: St Albans (Herts UK)
Question Autoland- "fault protection"

I was listening to EGGW approach a couple of nights back and the pilot of an aircraft that had just become localiser established on 08 informed the controller that he wished to carry out a "practice autoland". The controller acknowledged the request and went on to inform the pilot that there was "no fault protection".

When he was handed over to the tower the tower controller repeated the "fault protection" statement.

Can anyone shed some light on what "fault protection" means in this context?

Kind Regards,
???pax
???pax is offline  
Old 18th July 2001 | 13:17
  #2 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,331
Likes: 486
From: England
Post

For autolands for real (i.e. low visibility) there is a requirement to protect the integrity of the Instument Landing System. When an airport goes into "low visibility procedures" they place a restriction on the movement of vehicles within a certain section of the ILS beam, to prevent any distortion. Additionally there is a greater spacing between aircraft on approach, to ensure that the previous aircraft has cleared the sensitive area in good time. One of the reasons for delays when the weather conditions deteriorate. A practice autoland is one being carried out in better weather conditions, usually to keep crews current on the procedure. If the beam is distorted by a moving vehicle or aircraft it is not so critical, as the crew can see the deviation, monitor it and, if necessary, land manually.
Herod is offline  
Old 18th July 2001 | 13:25
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: St Albans (Herts UK)
Thumbs up

Thanks for the informative and speedy response Herod.
???pax is offline  
Old 19th July 2001 | 22:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
Post

There is also a requirement for a back up power supply for the ILS should the mains fail. I think this meay be required for runway lighting too.

[ 19 July 2001: Message edited by: Bally Heck ]
Bally Heck is offline  
Old 22nd July 2001 | 22:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Post

"No fault protection" means that the normal low visibility procedure which includes that the ATC standy diesel power becomes the primary electrical source is not put in to effect.
Allan is offline  
Old 24th July 2001 | 17:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Post

How often must pilots fly an autoland (or practice autoland) to stay current? I heard mentioned once a week but can't remember who from.
Vortex what...ouch! is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.