Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Critical Engine on a Jet

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Critical Engine on a Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th July 2001 | 18:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 142
Likes: 1
From: europe
Post

The point being...

money.

You take away the peak load on the engines, thus greatly reducing wear (especially in the hot section) and actually even reducing the possibility of an eng. failure during T/O (at least statistically... NO I won´t discuss the pros and cons).
wonderbusdriver is offline  
Old 17th July 2001 | 13:52
  #22 (permalink)  
tailscrape's Avatar

Terrier
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: moonbase alpha
Unhappy

So, when i am on fire in my 757 (upwind engine) with a strong crosswind i shouldn't worry about it? Not critical?

I appreciate that what day trader says is entirley correct in a purist viewpoint, but aviation is about reality. Not theory.

So, I still maintain that in reality on a real day your critical engine is the upwind one.

I would say that is fairly critical in a twin jet.IMHO.
tailscrape is offline  
Old 18th July 2001 | 13:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
Post

FlapsOne, could you give a more detailed explanation of the negative weathercock effect and describe what causes it?

As far as the critical engine's concerned, it's all a matter of which definition you use:
1. the critical engine is the engine that causes the greatest yawing moment when it fails (works for any multi-engine airplane).

2. the critical engine is the engine which has its centre of thrust furthest from the longitudinal axis (works for props only).

I'd vore for the first definition, as a strong crosswind can easily overcome the effect of the centre of thrust being further away from the longitudinal axis.

Erik.
erikv is offline  
Old 18th July 2001 | 15:31
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
From: UK
Thumbs up

Yep.

Proportionally small fin (with very small rudder) vs proportionally long fuselage. Fuelage wins. Strong crosswind on ground has greater effect on fuselage than fin causing it to yaw away from the crosswind.

I flew 3000 hrs+ in them and guarantee it's fact.
FlapsOne is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.