Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

BAA Security Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Oct 2009, 08:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BAA Security Help

Having returned from a very plesant European depolyment last April I seem to be being treated a lot more severely my BAA security than in the past.

What I would like to know is the "search rate" of X-rayed screend bags, It seems to me that once crew bags have past through the X-ray machine a lot of them are opend and very few have anything that infringes the regulations.

So to the request for help, if you are a Captain over the next week or two could you please post the "hand search rate" of your crews bags after X-raying and if any thing was found that was not within the rules.

I don't want to say too much about my personal conclusions about what is going on but a wider view would help me to understand BAA policy.

Thank you.

PS I only want replys from Captains so as to avoid "double hits" of a single inccident.
A and C is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 08:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent initiative!

Some weeks ago we spent 1 1/2 hour to clear LHR security. When we arrived at the security gate, there was one crew inside, and one bus ahead of us.
EVERYTHING was opened. The security crew refused to say anything about why they did this, and claimed nothing was out of the ordinary.

We arrived at the aircraft 5 minutes after our departure time.
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 10:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: LHR
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there anything else you would like to know about UK security?

Manning levels of check points? Frequency of hand searching? Weak search areas that would make for easy passage? Operatives that don't concentrate on their x-ray machines?

I get as frustrated as the next man about airport security everyday on my way to the flight deck, but publishing such detailed information here is entirely inappropriate. I would have thought that was obvious to an intelligent professional colleague.

You are an aviation professional I hope....? And not an FS jockey with Al-Qeda sympathies?
Magplug is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 10:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Magplug here... as annoying at it may seem to us drivers, these folks are doing a necessary job. Take your complaint to those who wish to dispatch us to kingdom come...
320DRIVER is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 12:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
320 - that was NOT his point!

Magplug - one would hope that "an intelligent professional colleague" would know that and not reply on the open forum.
BOAC is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 12:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: north
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can assure you A nad C (aka buster gonad) is a professional pilot and not only that but he is eminently qualified in the security department. This due to holding the world record for having his gonads felt by BAA's finest on the pretext of searching for liquids.
Stansted was his finest hour some years ago..

The impressive thing is that they were only frisking in the knee area.
wee one is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 13:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone who does not understand that the principal terrorist groups, with al Qa'ida in the lead, already know all they need to know about Security procedures in the UK and elsewhere doesn't begin to understand the problem of achieving good security of air transport.

As the PLO, Black September were doing in the 1970s, joined by PIRA then and later, al Qa'ida and others now have sleepers and informers where they need them. Some will be British citizens with squeaky clean records employed by BAA and other UK airports to touch up A&Cs gonads.

For balance, it should be pointed out that others will be equally squeaky-clean US Citizens employed in the same role by TSA.

Scary, isn't it?

Carry on posting, fellas, you're not going to reveal anything new.
10DowningSt is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2009, 14:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The request from A & C is a good indication of just how alienated most pilots feel from 'Security'. It's all pure theatre when viewed from a pilot's perspective.
Bernoulli is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2009, 20:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The request from A & C is a good indication of just how alienated most pilots feel from 'Security'. It's all pure theatre when viewed from a pilot's perspective.
Damn right! I'm more likely to lose my job because of the activities of these than any terrorist action. These people see me (and every other airport worker) as part of the problem rather than part of the solution. They are not employed for their intelligence, just their blind obedience to rules and procedures - just like another well known group of people some 60 years ago who. I think a few of them created the defence "that they were only following orders".

Prince Muhammad Bin Naif will tell you about the lastest methods employed by the religious nutters our morons are trying to trap, after he has had a few more showers. Now the tools of bad guys' trade are for all intents undetectable and we still can't take a yoghurt through airside.

You need to know very little about security to beat it (eg. ask West Midlands Air Support where their helicopter went). I've also only witnessed two (in 20 years of flying - so 5,000 times) checks on security at airports and in both cases they omitted to find prohibitted items. If there was a book, I know who I'd put my money on.

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 21:51
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on guys! the only way to get to grips with these people is by proving them to be as stupid as we know they are.................. some numbers please!
A and C is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2009, 14:20
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Down south
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lets be honest, it does not take much thought to work out how to get a person/package/or anything else, airside at any airport, and not much more thought as to how to get it on an aircraft.
The gripes and moans we all hear are aimed at the section of security who 'check' passengers as they go airside. It is a very public event and it may put off the opportunist, and yes it might just stop an amateur terrorist. However it is a brave politician who says 'enough' and lets remove this charade and make passenger and baggage screening realistic.
I would suggest that it is impossible to have 100% security whilst moving millions of people and baggage. The best security measures are those that occur in the background to which most people have little or no knowledge.
Frisking pensioners just makes some travellers feel happier travelling by air, but in reality does little else.
bingofuel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.