Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

L1011 start-up charter in Cardiff

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

L1011 start-up charter in Cardiff

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th February 2009 | 15:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Is that even possible?
I suspect not...by those at the only airline that couldn't make it work.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 18:48
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
If it was such a great design why are no modern tri-jets being produced now? All those 411B listed above are old and past it!
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 19:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
If it was such a great design why are no modern tri-jets being produced now?
For a very simple reason, Gorrilla...engines are now available with enough thust to produce a twin that can do the job.
Of course, the twin has operational restrictions that the trijet...or 4-engine airplane, does not.

At the time, the 'ole L1011 was the most modern, automated aeroplane in the skies, bar none.
It still is a viable performer in certain niche markets.
Comments to the contrary, not excepted.
IF it was soooo bad, the RAF would have eliminated the type, long ago.
Maybe.....

Many large international airlines made money with the TriStar, and yet...one quite large airline stands out amongst others, as having been a failure in this regard.

We know the reason...operational expertise.
IE: they simply could not cope.

Hardly surprising, now is it?

I must say however, that that lack of opertational expertise did NOT extend to the flight operationas department.
I personally know many of their former folks, and they rave about the TriStars performance, from a pilots perspective.
Apparently, the problems with the type at this one particular large airline was critically centered in the maintenance department.
Surprise, surprise.

IE: many there simply couldn't read (nor, apparently understand) the Lockheed supplied maintenance manual, or....had no comprehension of the maintenance required.

Other airlines...not so.
Among those were...

TWA
EAL
Saudia
AirLanka
Royal Jordanian
ANA
Gulf Air
Cathay Pacific
Delta (the larget operator with over sixty L10 aircraft)

The list goes on.
All quite satisfied operators.

Amazing...sour grapes from only one source.

Last edited by 411A; 15th February 2009 at 19:26.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 19:54
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
I wonder if 411a remembers how they were sold - the briefcases full of money used to bribe airline executives notably the Japanese - and the resulting scandals and resignations
bcgallacher is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 20:07
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 115
From: UK
Please don't try to ban dear old 411A. Every website in the world needs at least one 411A. Life would be so boring if we were all the same.

He obviously loves his dear old Tripestar and I can understand that, since my mates who have flown it tell me that it was the best and most comfortable over-engineered crew transport that was ever built.

It's just such a shame that it runs out of fuel after five and a half hours with max payload (otherwise Fedex would be flying at least 100 of them instead of DC-10s).
JW411 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 20:33
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Please don't try to ban dear old 411A.
It wouldn't happen, JW, for one very important reason.
I (rarely) personally insult contributors...only their misguided, disconnected, off the wall....ideas.
There is a very large difference.
Having been in the airline business for over forty years gives me quite a unique perspective...pilots...bit@hing and moaning all the time, ground engineers, the same bit@hing and wailing...but many miss the program altogether.
You MUST cooperate to graduate, simply because aircraft and maintenance decisions are made at the board level, which (few appreciate) are made rather above their pay grade.

Don't like it....quit, and find another job.
These folks who actually DO quit, will find that no one cares.

Nobody.

Next question?
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 20:44
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Elysion
I (rarely) personally insult contributors
True, you limit yourself to insulting people en masse. As if that showed more class.
Conan The Barber is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 20:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
The same could be said about the Nimrod....
In spades.
The P3 is (was) far superior, yet the UK presseed on with a totally outdated design.

The actual reason that the UK MoD cannot afford a TriStar replacement...TriStar does the job at a fraction of the cost of a new(er) design*.

Fact.

*Except.
IF some jack@ss commander decides to try an autoland from too low a selected height (never read the AFM, apparently) and prangs the beast beyond repair.

Last edited by 411A; 15th February 2009 at 21:16.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 22:06
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Quote:
I (rarely) personally insult contributors

Quote:
IF some jack@ss commander

And you were doing so well.........
Quite...except for one thing, said jack@ss commander ain't a contributor here on pprune...and even if he was, he would be told in no uncertain terms, that before one pushes the bat handles up to the command position, certain conditions have to be met...if only the he had read the AFM....and complied with same.

In short, and this applies to every type...RTFB.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2009 | 23:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Sale, Australia
411A, I've got you on my "must read" list, so one fan, but then I'm same generation more or less. Wonder what that says about me?
Brian Abraham is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2009 | 00:20
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
411A, I've got you on my "must read" list, so one fan, but then I'm same generation more or less. Wonder what that says about me?
More than likely...been there, done that...and have the hat and Tshirt to prove it.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2009 | 01:46
  #32 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
Ahhhh.... Of course!! The engines on the tristar must be crap
then! Silly me!!!

I foolishly thought it was an overweight, outdated lump of iron that was at fault!
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2009 | 21:52
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Sale, Australia
Some of you people need to grow up IMHO.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2009 | 22:23
  #34 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
To quote the words of a legend... "The day I grow up, is the day I give up!!"

Sound advice.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 00:50
  #35 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 3
From: Earth
Originally Posted by 411A

The actual reason that the UK MoD cannot afford a TriStar replacement...TriStar does the job at a fraction of the cost of a new(er) design*.

Fact.
Sorry 411A, but I have to disagree with you on this one. The Tristar is costing the RAF (British taxpayer) loads of money as they are on the ground most of the time. How do I know? Because we do a lot of MOD flights because the RAF can't operate these flights themselves due to tech aircraft.
CEJM is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 01:54
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
...due to tech aircraft.
If they put civvy folks in charge and had proper funding (very important), these aircraft, just like many older types, could be kept flying for a very long time.
Penny-wise, pound foolish with the MoD....apparently.
Lockheed still has a rep there, I believe....wonder if he is even listened to?
IE: Keep what you have and properly maintain it...far less expensive than purchasing new.
Provided, of course, that the airplanes are flown properly, to begin with....
Trying to engage A/L at too low an altitude, ain't good.
RTFB.
Perhaps a new concept to the RAF?
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 09:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Proper funding? surely you mean unlimited funding!
bcgallacher is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 09:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Elysion
If this is what you do with your cashcow, then......



By the way ASFKAP, it was actually the Loughead brothers he told how to do things.
Conan The Barber is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 11:28
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
The RAF moves troops to and from the UK mainly using Tristar jets, some of which are 30 years old.
The figures showed 27% of the fleet was regularly out of action between April 2007 and March 2008.

It would seem that the RAF has about as much expertise as did BA in the operation of the type....must be something in the local water supply.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 17th February 2009 | 12:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: PBI
Heard the airline was "Fly for Beans" and they have 2 EASA L1011 500 series located ready to go.

There's a good demand for charter work presently as both Luzair & Euro Atlantic are down having C Checks and engine AD done.
OldCessna is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.