Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Manual Speedbrakes on landing

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Manual Speedbrakes on landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th June 2007 | 12:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie
Manual Speedbrakes on landing

Hi,

Are there any performance considerations for using manual speedbrakes on landing? I fly the 737 and I haven't seen anything in the official books, however I did see a that you have to increase the LDR in an 'unofficial' book.

Just looking for an official reference. Nothing in my company's perf book either.

IR
frogone is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 13:06
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1
From: Hampshire, UK
You've checked your Flight Crew Operations Manual Performance Section (in our case QRH Perf. Section 12.4). There is no reference to it. There is no 'unofficial book' that applies. If it ain't there, it ain't a problem. Period.
Rainboe is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 13:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
From: uk
In the 737 classic MEL which my old company uses there is/was a performance correction of the order of a couple of hundred feet for Auto Speedbrake u/s.

MEL should have all the relevant bits for fault prior to dispatch, otherwise QRH/FCOM applies, as Rainboe says.
Gary Lager is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 13:24
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie
Yep I checked the QRH, there was nothing in it. I saw the unoffical couple of hundred feet to be added or a weight reduction, I'm looking for the official source for this info.

Our company is reactive and has the tendancy to point the finger in hindsight, which is great, as hindsight is 20/20.

IR
frogone is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 13:51
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I come to the conclusion that Mr B does not consider an adjustment necessary. Current company QRP has none and MEL refers me to company QRH for LD corrections and this has........................................none
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 14:28
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 198
Likes: 1
From: france
manual speedbrakes

hello gentlemen,
there is indeed a weight penalty for landing with manual speedbrakes. it is in the vol 3 flight planning & performances.
for the b738 ng, it states: for a flap 30 landing :"with manual speed brakes, decrease field limit weight by 4200kg".
bm
blackmail is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 14:40
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie
Say it aint so Joe

Yup, black mail is right, it's tucked away in the Boeing Flight Planning and Perf book. 4,200 Kgs.

IR
frogone is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 14:58
  #8 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
You guys have that on board your aircraft?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 15:14
  #9 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 1
From: Hampshire, UK
Que? If it's not in the QRH Non-Normal Landing Performance, then I would assume that for your company, no correction applies! How can it not be there, yet be in effect? Especially when nobody flying the aeroplane knows anything about it?
Rainboe is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 15:32
  #10 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Well - it be like the reduction in max landing weight for Cat3 in icing conditions, aren't it - and the take-off penalty for anti-skid u/s?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 15:40
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie
No prizes for Bill Boeing

Boeing arn't gonna win any prizes for clairy in the QRH. Like I said hindsight is 20/20, and the limitation should probably be added to the QRH section, why not?

IR
frogone is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 15:58
  #12 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
.so, back to question #8?
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 24th June 2007 | 16:47
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Poughkeepsie
No we don't carry it on board. But that wouldn't wash in a court of law.

IR
frogone is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.