Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Logbook question: actual IF conditions column

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Logbook question: actual IF conditions column

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st December 2006 | 11:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Logbook question: actual IF conditions column

In my logbook I have an extra column that says actual IF in cloud or words to that affect. Not that its really important but does one have to be the sole manipulator of the controls to log time time in this column; i.e. the PF. (This is not to be confused with the IFR column that all logbooks have btw and which I understand).

Thanks a bunch.
marsman is offline  
Reply
Old 8th December 2006 | 21:46
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Mars
Come on guys someone must know. Do you log IF time (under JAR), only as sole manipulator of the controls? Therefore when you are acting as PNF you dont enter anything?

Also whats the accepted term now a days: P1/S or PICUS when a co pilot is PF.

Thanks
marsman is offline  
Reply
Old 10th December 2006 | 06:01
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 5
From: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
If you take the phrase "sole manipulator of the controls" literally, then the only guy who logs actual IR would be autopilot! PF or PNF doesn't matter as long as you're P. What you log is actual time under IMC. I don't know what conditions on mars are, but in central Europe it's about 5-10% of flight time for jet jockeys and up to 25% for turboprop drivers.

You're not either P1/S or PICUS, unless covered by your company trainning programme (and proper designator should be contained there too). Under JAR, the only purpose of PiCUS is to build required 250 hrs of PiC needed for the issue of full ATPL. What some people make out of PiCUS concept is pretty amusing.
Clandestino is offline  
Reply
Old 13th December 2006 | 08:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Body
I fly a turbo-prop without autopilot. For me the whole flight minus taxy time is logged as Instrument time. I've asked about this and been told it's perfectly acceptable, especially in a non-autopilot a/c because you are hand flying on instruments, even in VMC.
When I'm PF = P1U/S, PNF = Co-Pilot.
The point is to be able to talk the talk and walk the walk when someone (CAA) asks you to, they're not really interested in how you colour by numbers. And no, I am not advocating cheating or anything else of that kind. It's the way it is.

Last edited by blueplume; 14th December 2006 at 12:48.
blueplume is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.