Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

ATR Power Levers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Oct 2006, 10:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Blighty - On secondment
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATR Power Levers

Anybody know why ATR power levers are different sizes?
Being asking a few guys who have been flying the machine for a few years and no clear answer as yet. Any ideas out there?

brgds,

GP
Global Pilot is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2006, 21:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Heart of Europe
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe same as for many props?

critical engine
error_401 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2006, 22:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the flight deck of course !!
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
critical engine
yes and so what ?? most of the twin engine propeller aircraft (piston and turboprop) have Eng 1 as a critical engine !!! do other A/C have a bigger PL1 than PL2 ? I dont think so !
ICING AOA is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2006, 22:06
  #4 (permalink)  
FLCH-SPD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Do you mean that the left is larger than the right, or different from aircraft to aircraft?
 
Old 10th Oct 2006, 22:31
  #5 (permalink)  
FLCH-SPD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ah, sorry just missed the last post.

I've noticed the same with the Aero Commander (turboprop), but I think the reason for this is because the left power lever houses a GA switch and horn silencer, maybe this could be the reason?
 
Old 10th Oct 2006, 23:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the flight deck of course !!
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0943680/L/

on the Dash8 both are the same size ...
ICING AOA is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2006, 23:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same as on the SAAB 340, same size!

Aussie
Aussie is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2006, 05:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it maybe because, after landing and engaging number 2 prop brake, you would taxi on number 1?
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2006, 06:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wheres all the check and training ATR captains when ya need em!



Aussie
Aussie is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2006, 11:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pprune calling Hugmonster..........
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2006, 21:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Correr es mi destino por no llevar papel
Posts: 1,422
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Reason is severly banal... insufficient clearence between PL2 and CL1, which was easier to correct by cutting off half an inch of PL2 handgrip than by repositioning PLs and redesigning the entire throttle quadrant. In other words, originally there was no room for F/O's LH thumb. Difference is visible here:

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0706707/L/

BTW, ATR has plenty of rudder and there's no noticable difference in controllability during EFATO no matter which donkey quits (in a sim, anyway). Also all systems can be powered from either engine, therefore there is actually no critical engine on ATR. Also single engine taxiing is done on eng no2 and I have certainly never engaged prop brake during taxiing, nor I can think of any reason why should anyone want to do it. Both PLs have the go-around button, no1 for capt's thumb, no2 for F/Os.

Last edited by Clandestino; 11th Oct 2006 at 21:31. Reason: I remembered one more thing...
Clandestino is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2006, 01:09
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it an SOP to taxi on 1 engine????

Do airlines actually do this?

Aussie
Aussie is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2006, 11:56
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Blighty - On secondment
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

QUOTE=Clandestino;2903149]Reason is severly banal... insufficient clearence between PL2 and CL1, which was easier to correct by cutting off half an inch of PL2 handgrip than by repositioning PLs and redesigning the entire throttle quadrant. In other words, originally there was no room for F/O's LH thumb.

Thanks for that Clandestino... seems like the best suggestion so far. I was kinda thinking that is was possibly some kit left over from a previous design etc.
Global Pilot is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2006, 13:27
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the flight deck of course !!
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So why is PL1 not as small as PL2 then ?





Is it an SOP to taxi on 1 engine????

Do airlines actually do this?
Yes, generally, ATR pilots feather engine 1 after landing for taxiing to the stand ! One important thing is to check the hydraulics and obviously the brakes !
ICING AOA is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 09:25
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our SOP's - in my ATR days - were to taxi with BOTH engines running, and props full fine..... Just to avoid the total loss of hydralics
White Knight is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 11:20
  #16 (permalink)  
FLCH-SPD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
in my ATR days - were to taxi with BOTH engines running, and props full fine
Does this mean having the condition levers fully forward? Isn't this rather noisy? I didn't think it was possible to choose the blade angle, I thought this was a function of the overspeed and underspeed govenors? (or dependant on PL position during beta mode)

(not a turboprop driver so just asking)
 
Old 14th Oct 2006, 11:26
  #17 (permalink)  
sir.pratt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
condition levers control fuel - not prop governor.

power levers control fuel - prop lever control the governor, which sets an rpm, which dictates blade angle.
 
Old 14th Oct 2006, 11:50
  #18 (permalink)  
FLCH-SPD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
condition levers control fuel - not prop governor.

power levers control fuel - prop lever control the governor, which sets an rpm, which dictates blade angle.
I thought the ATR only had PL's and Condition L's. Where are the prop levers then?

Now I'm confused!

I thought that the Power levers control fuel flow, while the position of the condition lever determines the RPM and hence the U/S and O/S govenors will adjust blade angle to maintain that RPM. When the PL are retarded to beta mode, the PL controls blade angle and fuel flow is used to control RPM????
 
Old 15th Oct 2006, 21:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: On the flight deck of course !!
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are several notches on the condition levers :

Fuel Shut Off
Feather
RPM -> Auto and OVRD (for PEC A/C) or Mini to Max (for classical versions)

ICING AOA is offline  
Old 15th Oct 2006, 21:48
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But that depends on which ATR model you fly. The posh ones with PEC's and EEC's use a little rotary knob to select the power rating which in turn selects the RPM. No condition or prop levers here (in the traditional sense!).

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.