delta wing?
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: here
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
delta wing?
Since concorde amongst others has demonstrated to us the effectiveness of the delta wing, e.g. high speed range without incurring the complexity and expense of moving t.e. and l.e. devices I just wondered why the swept wing is favoured over the delta in modern passenger aircraft.
rgds FH.
rgds FH.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Was Rhoose Regional
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably to do with the high angle of attack during low speed manoeuvres and because of this a lot of power was needed to keep the aircraft flying. Lots of power equals noise and people don’t like noise. The Concorde B model had leading edges designed into it
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oxford
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey, Mad Scientist, what about the Vulcan? That was (just) subsonic but handled like a dream and turned (especially at high altitude) tighter than any fighter.
It all depends on how you define 'outperform'.
It all depends on how you define 'outperform'.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, neither of those are really passenger aircraft, are they. Sustained or instantaneous rates of turn don't help much in airline economics.
One big disadvantage of the delta for commercial ops is something cited as an 'advantage' - ne l/e or t/e devices.
With a wing-plus-tail I can put all kinds of advanced high lift systems on the aircraft and get a vast improvement in field performance. With a pure delta I'm limited by the need to use the t/e for pitch control.
That's going to hurt the economics of the delta for two aircraft operating in the same environment - unless you're operating off very long runways the delta is going to be MTOW-restricted more often.
One big disadvantage of the delta for commercial ops is something cited as an 'advantage' - ne l/e or t/e devices.
With a wing-plus-tail I can put all kinds of advanced high lift systems on the aircraft and get a vast improvement in field performance. With a pure delta I'm limited by the need to use the t/e for pitch control.
That's going to hurt the economics of the delta for two aircraft operating in the same environment - unless you're operating off very long runways the delta is going to be MTOW-restricted more often.
With a pure delta I'm limited by the need to use the t/e for pitch control.
The Mirage 2000 has LE devices, and they would have to be balanced with increased lift at the rear of the wing.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One big disadvantage of the delta for commercial ops is something cited as an 'advantage' - ne l/e or t/e devices.
OTOH, stall characteristics might preclude certification, unless fancy fly-by-wire stall-recovery aids are incorporated...
