Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Questions
Reload this Page >

Lanzarote Departure

Wikiposts
Search
Questions If you are a professional pilot or your work involves professional aviation please use this forum for questions. Enthusiasts, please use the 'Spectators Balcony' forum.

Lanzarote Departure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Apr 2004, 11:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lanzarote Departure

Returned to UK from a holiday in Lanzarote this week in a B737-200 (or maybe 100 series) and had to refuel en-route at Faro. The Skipper implied that this was because we departed Arrecife rwy 03 as opposed to 21.

As a simple area ATCO, just wondered why we could have carried enough fuel from a rwy 21 departure but not rwy 03.

Cheers,

96
1996 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2004, 11:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: U.K.
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Large lump of granite off the end causes a much reduced maximum take off weight on 03.
Quite often you can lift more weight (fuel) by using 21 with a 10kt tail wind than you can using 03 with a 10 knot headwind!
21 has no obstacles (the departure is over the sea).
Engine overtemp is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2004, 19:10
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks. Spotted the lump but didn't realise it is so strategically placed!I guess your comment on downwind deps off 21 brings it home.

Any problems with the approach to 21?
1996 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2004, 19:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,013
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
Yeah But !!!! Over 80% of flights take off and land on 03.

This of course, is pretty much straight into the prevailing winds, the Trade Winds or Alisios as they are known locally and is the only runway with ILS.

Oddly enough, when the wind is in West and the storms come, all aircraft are required to do a visual, sometimes popping out of the cloud cover just in time to slam the aircraft down on the runway or occasionally whacking in full power for a go-around.

Quite something to observe !!

Quite why your flight had to refuel in Faro is more likely to be connected with headwinds, which is the most frequently given reason.
El Grifo is online now  
Old 21st Apr 2004, 00:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Egcc
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any problems with the approach to 21?
Rwy 21 is non-precision and steeper than normal(3 degree) slope. Recently been designated a captain's only landing off this approach with my company.

Yeah But !!!! Over 80% of flights take off and land on 03.
As for departures off 03, yes the majority are off there, but we have an emergency turn (used if you lose an engine as you can't outclimb the granite!)

PP
Pilot Pete is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2004, 21:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,013
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
For "Lump of granite" read :- Montana Mina, a large cinder cone.

Still an obstacle in the event of losing a donkey.

El Grifo is online now  
Old 22nd Apr 2004, 21:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,714
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I paxed to ACE in an L10 going back a few years (in fact, it was a month before CKT retired them, CC all very watery-eyed!).

We arrived on 21, which I understand is offset as well as slightly steep....terrain was certainly impressively close.

When we left a few weeks later - departed off 21, against a flow of arrivals on 03 - we were at the hold for over 20 mins.

Winds were v.light/temps high IIRC, so another reason I guess not to depart towards the spectacular volcanic scenery.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2004, 22:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ask the tower !
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
who the hell is still flying -200's from ACE to UK ?????
bacardi walla is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2004, 12:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,714
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
.....a educated guess, European.

Some relatives are flying with them to FNC (nearly in the Canaries!) in a couple of weeks, ex. CWL

Last edited by Wycombe; 23rd Apr 2004 at 13:02.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2004, 17:09
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct - it was European.
1996 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2004, 17:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes many is the tailwind take off I have flown off RW 21 in B737-200 and -300. The nice thing is that our B737-200 were certified for up to 15 kt tailwind whereas the -300 was 10kt tailwind max so the -200 had a greater degree of flexibility in this area.

Then they promulgated an Emergency Turn off RW 03:-

"At 100 ft (Yes thats ONE HUNDRED FEET) turn right heading 120 degrees...." - all this on ONE engine - GOOD GAME, GOOD GAME!
fireflybob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.