Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Could someone plz explain about FAA IR conv? The implications?

Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Could someone plz explain about FAA IR conv? The implications?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 15:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Could someone plz explain about FAA IR conv? The implications?

Could someone please explain to me in plain English how big a deal is it to convert the FAA IR into the JAA IR?

How much money can you save doing it this way? And what is the route, is it JAA ATPL writtens, JAA CPL and then FAA IR and then the conversion to JAA IR?
Kapooley is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 17:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The process -
10 hrs FNPT2, 5 hrs a/c, 170a test, flight test.

The implications -
Employers will be on the lookout for people who have taken this 'shortcut'. I would suggest, purely from a future employment perspective, that this road should be travelled by experienced pilots doing conversions and not by those looking for an initial rating.
Grivation is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 18:15
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks for your reply!

So I take it that its not a viable option for most wannabes? I was under the impression that employers were only interested in IFR hours and the actual licence. But its not a short cut though? The only short cut is through the JAA minefield? Is this correct???
Kapooley is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 18:18
  #4 (permalink)  
Paid up
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it would be respectable thing for someone who fancies doing a spot of flight instructing Stateside, returning 18 months later with a fist full of multi-time.
Gin Slinger is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 19:04
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gin, as long as you've used the rating in anger then I couldn't see that there would be too many objections.
Grivation is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 19:59
  #6 (permalink)  
Paid up
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grav: yes, of course, I'll be CFII-ing all the way...
Gin Slinger is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2002, 20:23
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this proves it s a question of money again.FAA training is the same as the CAA/JAR but with the FAA you can log more time and more hours.So why not a FAA with 1000h then a convertion.
if the CAA accepts the FAA IFR, it means the US training is not so bad.Probably better...now the CAA have to accept that no only British pilot know to fly.
EU training or US training, up to you.!it's a free market!
gorky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.