Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies)
Reload this Page >

Technical Review Of New Syllabuses Published

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Technical Review Of New Syllabuses Published

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th June 2016 | 14:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Technical Review Of New Syllabuses Published

The NPA can be obtained from Notices of Proposed Amendment (NPAs) | EASA. This is the first major proposal to update the theoretical knowledge syllabuses and learning objectives in a decade.

There are three months open for any comments. Hopefully there won't be many

The guys on the committee did some really good work which I hope the readers will appreciate.
paco is offline  
Old 9th June 2016 | 16:03
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
We will certainly be commenting on the introduction of the new subject 100KSA.
  • First comment is that we enthusiastically embrace the concept.
  • Second comment is that the concept as applied is outdated in educational theory by about 20 years as the third term 'Attitude' is very difficult to measure. It is now almost universally acknowledged as KSB, where B stands for Behaviour as an indicator, if you like, of attitude.
  • Third comment is that the proposed amendment includes a provision for the KSA module to be completed before the final ATPL ground exam, quite contrary to the enthusiastic and worthy statement earlier in the NPA (page 7) where they say it is an area "which will be holistically integrated into and throughout the entire training syllabus". I think it is a huge mistake to force completion of KSA100 in the groundschool phase, particularly as most integrated candidates won't even have seen an aircraft at this stage, the completion point should be licence issue.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Old 11th June 2016 | 07:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Air OPS apply
... the majority of current airline transport pilots knowledge exams fail to validate the necessary knowledge competencies to proceed with indoctrination to an international air operator.
- revamp LOs
- abolish MCQs
- introduce oral exams and open question tests judged by a panel of specialists
- real competency verified by experts now flows into the industry
Wrist Watch is offline  
Old 11th June 2016 | 20:46
  #4 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 7
From: sunny troon
How do UK / EUR ATCOs achieve licence issue?
parkfell is offline  
Old 11th June 2016 | 20:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: out there somewhere
When is the proposed start date for any new syllabus?
wonder88 is offline  
Old 12th June 2016 | 06:20
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
By the time the legal process is through, around 2018
paco is offline  
Old 14th June 2016 | 16:38
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: England
Paco. I have registered to the EASA website that allows you to add/edit comments to the various NPA 2016-03 documents but the editing system does not work and I can`t make any comments. Does it work for you? What am I doing wrong?
Stanley Eevil is offline  
Old 14th June 2016 | 16:49
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Sadly, I have no idea! I can forward a message to the people concerned if you like?

A couple of thoughts - are you using internet explorer? Maybe try Firefox or Waterfox?
paco is offline  
Old 14th June 2016 | 17:55
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: England
I `ve used IE, Google Chrome and Firefox, but can`t get the highlighting tool to work so can`t add any comments.
Stanley Eevil is offline  
Old 14th June 2016 | 18:28
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
OK, I will mention it in the appropriate place
paco is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 00:33
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Bohol, Philippines
Hopefully there will be many comments which will be actioned
SFI145 is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 04:53
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Hopefully, there will be very few - the committee spent a few months trying to get it right.
paco is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 05:37
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: England
I think they got it very WRONG in moving lots of navigational LOs from Gen Nav into Flt Planning. You PLAN on the ground and EXECUTE that plan in the air. Any corrections will be navigational solutions, Descent strategies for example come under the heading of `VERTICAL NAVIGATION` as far as I `m concerned.
The parameter MONITORED in flight is FUEL - hence the importance of CAP697.
Yes, of course you keep an eye on tracking etc but corrections (e.g. 1 in 60 rule) are NAVIGATIONAL techniques, not planning techniques.

Last edited by Stanley Eevil; 15th June 2016 at 12:35.
Stanley Eevil is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 09:20
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
A very good point - fortunately, you can't blame me for that one!

I will mention your comments though, unless you are going to comment yourself?
paco is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 10:08
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: England
Phil, thanks for the reply and I am encouraged that we seem to be in agreement.
I still can`t find a way of making a comment on the EASA site - but I will keep trying. If you are prepared to pass on my views in the meantime, I would be very grateful! I feel quite strongly about this one.
Stanley Eevil is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 11:00
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
Done!.......
paco is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 15:32
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 74
From: White Waltham, Prestwick & Calgary
To those who can't log on, apparently:

"Usually, if you log on in CRT and select the NPA you wish to comment on, you need to right-click on any of the segments displayed on the right-hand side of the screen in order to ‘add comment’."

If there is still a problem I can put you in touch with the tech guys.
paco is offline  
Old 15th June 2016 | 16:23
  #18 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 1
From: England
OK, that seems to work. Thought I had to highlight the relevant text on the left hand side where the actual NPA document sits and then right-click.
I `ll try and add some comments tomorrow.
Stanley Eevil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.