Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

BA Trainee eyesight requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th April 2001 | 19:43
  #21 (permalink)  
jlms
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Rote 8, what stricter criteria does BA specify for eyesight?

Cessnaman, what specific problem with his eyesight does your friend have?

Thanks.

jlms
 
Old 26th April 2001 | 19:59
  #22 (permalink)  
Rote 8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

JLMS

I cant remember the specifics off the top of my head.

The gist of it however is that the CAA have requirements in terms of the maximum stregnth(if that is the correct term) of your correction but no requirement for unaided visual acuity.

You must have a visual acuity of at least 6/9 in each eye seperately or 6/6 using both eyes together but without your glasses or contact lenses you do not need to meet a particular standard.

BA however insist that irrespective of the standard you can acheive corrected you must have a visual acuity unaided of (I think) 6/24. This means that without your glasses you are capable of reading a letter on the chart from 6m that a baseline eye would be capable of reading from 24m distant.

If this has not answered your question fully or if you need more specifics feel free to e mail me.

Cessnaman - Thanks.

Cheers
 
Old 27th April 2001 | 01:27
  #23 (permalink)  
crazypilot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I had heard that BA have now dropped their own 'restrictive' requirements regarding eyesight and now as long as you can pass a Class 1, you can get through the BA medical aswell (well the vision part anyway).

Hope this helps.
 
Old 27th April 2001 | 14:49
  #24 (permalink)  
jlms
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quite clear Rote8, Thanks.
 
Old 27th April 2001 | 15:37
  #25 (permalink)  
Speedbird 2946
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

BA have firmly and definitely dropped their 6/24 rule and are now entirely in line with the JAA regs. Proof in the pudding?... I'm a cake with custard..

Drop me a line for more info

SB
 
Old 27th April 2001 | 15:43
  #26 (permalink)  
Rote 8
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Thanks Speedbird

Such a dessert was exactly what I was looking for!
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.