Cheapest Flight schools?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheapest Flight schools?
Can anyone tell me some of the best flight schools that are fairly cheap?
I wouldn't mind living anywhere in the world for a few years, but the price is my main concern about becoming a pilot (as is usually the case)
I do want the school to be good, but really cheap, which will be difficult to find, but with the great minds on this forum I hope someone can give me an answer. Also a modular course, although integrated could also be possible, thank you.
I wouldn't mind living anywhere in the world for a few years, but the price is my main concern about becoming a pilot (as is usually the case)
I do want the school to be good, but really cheap, which will be difficult to find, but with the great minds on this forum I hope someone can give me an answer. Also a modular course, although integrated could also be possible, thank you.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do want the school to be good, but really cheap
Last edited by Transsonic2000; 5th Oct 2014 at 02:17.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Domaine de la Romanee-Conti
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
jamyjay assuming you're British, your problem will not be so much finding "a cheap flying school anywhere on earth" but converting your licence to the UK EASA standard if you choose to train elsewhere.
There are plenty of schools in the US etc that are as cheap as chips but I guarantee you'll be kicking yourself when you're doing that highly expensive EASA licence conversion course.
Generally speaking it's almost always cheaper to train in the country you ultimately wish to fly in.
On a pure cost basis assuming an EASA licence is what you want to end up with, I'd be looking at eastern europe - maybe poland or croatia?
Transsonic is kind of right on a country-by-country basis but, certainly in the case of the UK, there are schools that charge excessively high fees based on reputation when they're issuing the same UK EASA licence at the end of the day. Once you've got the job, nobody cares if you have a 30 grand modular licence or a 100 grand integrated one.
There are plenty of schools in the US etc that are as cheap as chips but I guarantee you'll be kicking yourself when you're doing that highly expensive EASA licence conversion course.
Generally speaking it's almost always cheaper to train in the country you ultimately wish to fly in.
On a pure cost basis assuming an EASA licence is what you want to end up with, I'd be looking at eastern europe - maybe poland or croatia?
Transsonic is kind of right on a country-by-country basis but, certainly in the case of the UK, there are schools that charge excessively high fees based on reputation when they're issuing the same UK EASA licence at the end of the day. Once you've got the job, nobody cares if you have a 30 grand modular licence or a 100 grand integrated one.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks luke, however how much advantage is it having an integrated course license when going for your first job? I am looking at a few schools and cadetships in the uk but will need to wait on exam results.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Domaine de la Romanee-Conti
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
My personal opinion is that integrated isn't worth the money unless you're on a "tagged" course or whatever they call it these days, where there's a specific airline waiting for you at the end.
My reasoning being that self sponsored flight training, whether it's integrated or modular, is a huge risk either way, and a lot of people don't make it - so I'd rather gamble with 40 thousand quid than 90 thousand.
However I'm a bit old-school and still a huge fan of the modular-FI-turboprop-jet thing and I'm also a few years uncurrent on the specifics of the UK job market so
My reasoning being that self sponsored flight training, whether it's integrated or modular, is a huge risk either way, and a lot of people don't make it - so I'd rather gamble with 40 thousand quid than 90 thousand.
However I'm a bit old-school and still a huge fan of the modular-FI-turboprop-jet thing and I'm also a few years uncurrent on the specifics of the UK job market so
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Gondwanaland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only advice i can give you on starting out is this, it doesn't matter if one school is $50 more or less than the other school, If you pay that $50 more and have a great instructor willing to work with the student, deliver good pre-flight and post-flight briefs and have good delivery of lessons. You will find it might be $50 initially upfront but it will save you thousands in the long run.
Myself, I was very worried financially and I started at one place (still of similar price just closer to "home") which I learnt quickly wasn't working, motivation from the instructor and myself wasn't the same and I changed to a school at a large training airport which changed my whole opinion on the saving a quick buck as I saved more in the long run. I hope my career is also better off for the investment.
Myself, I was very worried financially and I started at one place (still of similar price just closer to "home") which I learnt quickly wasn't working, motivation from the instructor and myself wasn't the same and I changed to a school at a large training airport which changed my whole opinion on the saving a quick buck as I saved more in the long run. I hope my career is also better off for the investment.
jamyjay99
For those who have a genuine well founded interest in the flight instructor job for what the job is in itself, and who think of other aspects as coming second, I recommend going for the rating and the job, if you can.
For those who see it as a way of time building, or how it shows on your resume, DONīT DO IT. You will not like it, students and colleagues and management will not like it, and it will hurt your reputation. Think of other options.
In any case you probably have some time to go before making up your mind about this aspect.
Good luck in your explorations and choices.
Is having a flight instructers rating worth it? like does it help getting a job with an airline not just to actually instructing?
For those who see it as a way of time building, or how it shows on your resume, DONīT DO IT. You will not like it, students and colleagues and management will not like it, and it will hurt your reputation. Think of other options.
In any case you probably have some time to go before making up your mind about this aspect.
Good luck in your explorations and choices.
Last edited by janrein; 6th Oct 2014 at 17:30. Reason: typo
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats with the costs?
Im cant find any reason why integrated courses cost more, as in theory they should cost less? sorry if the answer is here somewhere but i cannot find it
I understand that airlines may prefer pilots with an integrated course license, but i dont get why it would cost more, as ive seen schools that charge more for integrated whilst offering modular for thousands cheaper? Sorry if this is actually obvious and im just stupid
I understand that airlines may prefer pilots with an integrated course license, but i dont get why it would cost more, as ive seen schools that charge more for integrated whilst offering modular for thousands cheaper? Sorry if this is actually obvious and im just stupid
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Domaine de la Romanee-Conti
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Completely disagree with janrein. 99.9% of every flight instructor ever, has used it as a stepping stone to the airlines, the system works and it's well understood. Almost every school would cease to function overnight if you took away the hour building instructors. I didn't start out doing it for love but I did it for 7 years and grew to really enjoy it, and I'd go back to it tomorrow if only they paid tax free long haul salaries
Also, the 1% of people I worked with who were "career instructors" were usually grumpy old ers, and while they invariably had a great deal of knowledge and experience, their attitude sucked. They had grown stale from sitting in the same office and flying the same circuit and swimming in the same little fish pond for 30 years. They were patronizing and condescending towards other instructors, and loved the fact that the students were all terrified of them.
Also, the 1% of people I worked with who were "career instructors" were usually grumpy old ers, and while they invariably had a great deal of knowledge and experience, their attitude sucked. They had grown stale from sitting in the same office and flying the same circuit and swimming in the same little fish pond for 30 years. They were patronizing and condescending towards other instructors, and loved the fact that the students were all terrified of them.
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luke,
Your experience and mine are complete opposites.
I've flown with many instructors for test rides, but really only had lessons from seven.
Of the seven, one (the first one) was an hour builder.
Once I figured out he was there to build hours and not instruct me, I switched to a chap who loved teaching.
From that day on, I always interview an instructor before I take lessons (whether that's IR, CPL, Multi, renewals, or whatever).
During the interview I establish that 1) they're interested in teaching, not hour building, and 2) that they're the kind of person that I can get along with well in a cramped space.
So, six of the seven have been excellent instructors, who teach flying because they love to teach flying.
Your experience and mine are complete opposites.
I've flown with many instructors for test rides, but really only had lessons from seven.
Of the seven, one (the first one) was an hour builder.
Once I figured out he was there to build hours and not instruct me, I switched to a chap who loved teaching.
From that day on, I always interview an instructor before I take lessons (whether that's IR, CPL, Multi, renewals, or whatever).
During the interview I establish that 1) they're interested in teaching, not hour building, and 2) that they're the kind of person that I can get along with well in a cramped space.
So, six of the seven have been excellent instructors, who teach flying because they love to teach flying.
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my own experience:
I did my Integrated training in Lithuania. I hold now an EASA F ATPL + MCC.
Training there is pretty good. I am talking about Baltic Aviation Academy.
There are many video's on youtube from this school.
They use Bristol Ground School for ATPL Theory. Have 9 Tecnam P2002JF's. The Oldest one is 2,5 yrs old.
Then 1 C172SP with Garmin 1000, but I think they leased another one this year. Is only 8 yrs old.
Then 1 Multi Engine Tecnam P2006T.
1 2 year old FNPTII for SEP IR and MEP IR.
1 A320 Level D FFS + B737CL Level D FFS . At the Boeing you will do the MCC.
All in all nice fleet, and nice to learn to fly with. And at the end of the line , they use not so much fuel. Which is also one of the reasons why they can offer a better price.
Then the living expenses are extremely low. So also there you save quiet some money.
Training costs are around 55K Euro. Say 10 K for living expenses. So you end up with like 65-70K Euro.
After training they do not give a damn about you. They will NOT help you to get a job. Unless you are willing to pay a load of money on one of their P2F programs, which I suggest you NOT to step into. They are namely also an TRTO. So an ATO incl. Type Rating Training Centre.
During the training if you are not happy with something, then you SHOULD speak up to management. They Will NOT like that because they expect you to be a schoolboy or girl. And you HAVE to listen only to them. I am here not talking about Lectures. Lectures are good and training itself is also good with experienced instructors.
In general. I am happy that I did my training there. Had a great time there. Met also there my Future Wife .
So I would say, contact them. Make an appointment , and go there. You will not regret it.
After training, there are other ways to get FO job.
Myself I am now FA in an German Airline. Nothing is guaranteed , but I maybe get my shot here maybe pretty soon since. Then I also DONT have to pay for my TR.
Good luck with making decisions.
I did my Integrated training in Lithuania. I hold now an EASA F ATPL + MCC.
Training there is pretty good. I am talking about Baltic Aviation Academy.
There are many video's on youtube from this school.
They use Bristol Ground School for ATPL Theory. Have 9 Tecnam P2002JF's. The Oldest one is 2,5 yrs old.
Then 1 C172SP with Garmin 1000, but I think they leased another one this year. Is only 8 yrs old.
Then 1 Multi Engine Tecnam P2006T.
1 2 year old FNPTII for SEP IR and MEP IR.
1 A320 Level D FFS + B737CL Level D FFS . At the Boeing you will do the MCC.
All in all nice fleet, and nice to learn to fly with. And at the end of the line , they use not so much fuel. Which is also one of the reasons why they can offer a better price.
Then the living expenses are extremely low. So also there you save quiet some money.
Training costs are around 55K Euro. Say 10 K for living expenses. So you end up with like 65-70K Euro.
After training they do not give a damn about you. They will NOT help you to get a job. Unless you are willing to pay a load of money on one of their P2F programs, which I suggest you NOT to step into. They are namely also an TRTO. So an ATO incl. Type Rating Training Centre.
During the training if you are not happy with something, then you SHOULD speak up to management. They Will NOT like that because they expect you to be a schoolboy or girl. And you HAVE to listen only to them. I am here not talking about Lectures. Lectures are good and training itself is also good with experienced instructors.
In general. I am happy that I did my training there. Had a great time there. Met also there my Future Wife .
So I would say, contact them. Make an appointment , and go there. You will not regret it.
After training, there are other ways to get FO job.
Myself I am now FA in an German Airline. Nothing is guaranteed , but I maybe get my shot here maybe pretty soon since. Then I also DONT have to pay for my TR.
Good luck with making decisions.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think my initial post came across not quite the way i wanted it to, I was just wondering if there are any good cheap schools. I just do not want to waste some money on a course that another school can deliver the same quality for cheaper
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 738
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since the licenses are the same at the end of the road, I prefer spending 15500 in Bartolini Air than 40000 in FTE Jerez (CPL, ME, IR). If that is going to ruin you more options to get an INTERVIEW thatīs something that still needs to be checked. I have friends working for RYR who studied in cheap flight schools and people from FTE who are still looking for a job.
What's really important is having good flight instructors who teach you to be a better pilot and be fully ready for each checkride.
What's really important is having good flight instructors who teach you to be a better pilot and be fully ready for each checkride.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you live your dream, so the school i'm looking at costs about 50k for its modular course that includes everything expect MCC, how much did you spend for living expensing, presuming the training lasts about 2 years or so?