Wikiposts
Search
Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) A forum for those on the steep path to that coveted professional licence. Whether studying for the written exams, training for the flight tests or building experience here's where you can hang out.

Cross-country touch and go logging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Sep 2012, 08:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: EU
Age: 35
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cross-country touch and go logging

I'm having some doubt regarding logging a cross country flight with t&g in my logbook - JAR 1.080 says:
If the holder of a licence carries out a number of flights upon the same day returning on each occasion to the same place of departure and the interval between successive flights does not exceed thirty minutes, such series of flights may be recorded as a single entry.
Some people say it's perfectly correct to log such flight as one entry, with appropriate number of landings in the column and maybe also a remark that it was XC flight, while on the other hand, it's still multiple flights and they weren't carried from the same airfield. What's the general view on this?
GTwice is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2012, 11:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
returning on each occasion to the same place of departure
You'll find that logging flights isn't always a precise science. However, it's my opinion that the wording above will dictate that if you do a "triangle" sortie, you'll need to record it on three lines.
bfisk is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2012, 06:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midlands
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definitely NOT multiple flights if you're only performing touch and go's inbetween your point of departure and arrival airfield. The key events are start-up/brakes-off to brakes-on/shutdown times, with the number of total landings recorded as such, with relevant comments within the 'Remarks and Endorsements' (or alternative) section of your logbook entry.
Happy Wanderer is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2012, 13:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Well if you are really technical about it and start looking at definitions; with a touch-and-go you never come to a full stop.
Therefore the flight continues.
If you do a full stop, clear teh runway and taxi back for departure you completed one and started another flight.
So, if a full stop is involved, multiple entries in the logbook.
If tgo's are involved, single entrie in the logbook.
B2N2 is online now  
Old 11th Sep 2012, 21:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: EU
Age: 35
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't thought about that, guess that really clears things up.
GTwice is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2012, 13:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Between 0 and 41000 ft
Age: 35
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if you are really technical about it and start looking at definitions; with a touch-and-go you never come to a full stop.
Therefore the flight continues.
If you do a full stop, clear teh runway and taxi back for departure you completed one and started another flight.
So, if a full stop is involved, multiple entries in the logbook.
If tgo's are involved, single entrie in the logbook.
That was how I did in my flight training !

T&G - one entry with all landings
Full stop - one entry per flight
plikee is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2012, 18:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The definition of flight time for fixed wing aircraft is "The total time from the moment an aircraft first moves for the purpose of taking off until the moment it finally comes to rest at the end of the flight". If during the course of a flight, the aircraft carries out a touch-and-go or even lands, taxies around and takes off again, this does not represent the end of the flight. Only when the aircraft finally comes to rest is the flight complete.

To an extent, this leaves it open to the PIC to decide what he considers to the the final coming to rest and, therefore, how flight time is divided into log book entries but since, by definition, in a touch-and-go, the aircraft does not come to rest, it cannot be the end of the flight or the associated log book entry. As the OP points out, any number of discrete flights may be combined into a single log book entry provided that they all take place on the same day and consecutive flights are no more than 30 minutes apart.

Of course, if we are being really technical, whatever is in JAR-FCL 1.080 becomes entirely irrelevant in a couple of days time, but then AMC1 FCL.050 says exactly the same thing.
BillieBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.